Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 187–198 | Cite as

Nieuwe wegen in de psychoanalyse

  • Marc Hebbrecht
Forum

Samenvatting

In dit artikel wordt een overzicht gegeven van enkele belangrijke trends in de psychoanalyse en hoe deze zich verder zouden kunnen ontwikkelen. De kritiek op de psychoanalyse wordt bondig samengevat. De vraag of de klassieke psychoanalyse nog relevant is, wordt in verband gebracht met een discussie van het effectiviteitsonderzoek. De belangrijkste verschuivingen komen aan bod alsook de communicatie met de andere wetenschappen en de nieuwe invloeden op de theorie en techniek van de psychoanalyse en de impact van de mentalisatiebeweging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Literatuur

  1. Bateman, A. W. & Fonagy, P. (2004). Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder : mentalization based treatment. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bateman, A.W. & Fonagy, P. (2006). Mentalization-based treatment for borderline personality disorder. A practical guide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blass, R.B. & Carmeli, Z. (2007). The case against neuropsychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88,19-40.Google Scholar
  4. Botella, C. & Botella, S. (2005). The work of psychic figurability. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cluckers, G. & Meurs, P. (2005). Bruggen tussen denk-wijzen. In M. Kinet & R.Vermote (red.), Mentalizatie (pp.11-34). Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  6. Diatkine, R. (2007). Lacan. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 643-660.Google Scholar
  7. Ferro, A. (2002). In the analyst’s consulting room. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Ferro, A. (2005). Seeds of illness, Seeds of recovery. The genesis of suffering and the role of psychoanalysis. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Ferro, A. (2006). Psychoanalysis as therapy and storytelling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E.L. & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fonagy, P. (2006). Evidence-based psychodynamic psychotherapies. In PDM Task force (ed.), Psychodynamic diagnostic manual (pp.765-808). Silver Spring: Alliance of psychoanalytic organizations.Google Scholar
  12. Fonagy, P. & Target, M. (2007). Playing with reality: IV. A theory of external reality rooted in intersubjectivity. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 917-938.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, S. (1919). Wegen van de psychoanalytische therapie. In S. Freud (2006), Werken 8 (pp. 50-58). Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  14. Goldberg, A. (2001). Postmodern psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82, 123-128.Google Scholar
  15. Goretti, G.R. (2007). Projective identification. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 387-406.Google Scholar
  16. Grotstein, J.S. (2007). A beam intense darkness. Wilfred Bion’s legacy to psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  17. Hebbrecht, M. & Willemsen, M. (red.) (2007). De borderlinepatiënt in dagbehandeling. Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  18. Hebbrecht, M. (2007). De droom, anno 2007. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 49, 877-886.Google Scholar
  19. Heenen-Wolff, S. (2007). From symbolic law to narrative capacity. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 75-90.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan-Solms, K. & Solms, M. (2000). Clinical studies in neuro-psychoanalysis. Madison: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kernberg, O.F. (2000). A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 97-120.Google Scholar
  22. Kernberg, O.F. (2006). The coming changes in psychoanalytic education: Part I. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 1649-1673.Google Scholar
  23. Kernberg, O.F. (2007). The coming changes in psychoanalytic education: Part II. The educational boundary. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 183-202.Google Scholar
  24. Meyer, C., Borch-Jacobsen, M., Cottraux, J., Pleux, D. & Van Rillaar, J. (red.) (2005). Le livre noir de la psychoanalyse. Paris: Les Arènes.Google Scholar
  25. Milton, J., Polmear, C., & Fabricius, J. (2004). A short introduction to psychoanalysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Robinson, P. (1993). Freud and his critics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sabbadini, A. (2003). The couch and the silver screen. Psychoanalytic reflections on European cinema. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Sabbadini, A. (2007). Projected shadows. Psychoanalytic reflections on the representation of loss in European cinema. Hove: Brunner-Routledge. Google Scholar
  29. Solms, M. & Turnbull, O. (2002). The Brain and the inner world. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  30. Tuckett, D., Basile, R., Birksted Breen, D., Bohm, T., Denis, P., Ferro, A., Hinz, H., Jemstedt, A., Mariotti, P. & Schubert, J. (2008) Psychoanalysis comparable and incomparable. The evolution of a method to describe and compare psychoanalytic approaches. New Library of Psychoanalysis, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Vermote, R. (2007). Divan-analyse: een empirische benadering. Tijdschrift voor Psychoanalyse, 13, 192-203.Google Scholar
  32. Winnicott, D.W. (1963). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. In Winnicott, R.W., The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 179-192). London: Hogarth Press & The Institute of Psycho-Analysis. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Hebbrecht
    • 1
  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations