Neuropraxis

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 77–81 | Cite as

Bewust worden van beweging

  • Richard van Wezel
  • Frank Kupper
Artikelen

Abstract

Trek de antenne uit je televisie en kijk naar het willekeurig patroon van beurtelings oplichtende pixels. Speel ermee, knijp je ogen toe en concentreer je. Vanuit de chaos komt dan een duidelijk bewegend patroon naar voren. Bijvoorbeeld stippen die naar rechts bewegen of roteren. Door je te concentreren kun je zelf bepalen welke beweging je wilt zien. Een beweging zien die er niet is. Hoe kan dat? Wanneer word je je bewust van een beweging?

Literatuur

  1. Bittar RG, Ptito M, Faubert J, Dumoulin SO, Ptito A. Activation of the remaining hemisphere following stimulation of the blind hemifield in hemispherectomized subjects. Neuroimage. 1999 Sep;10(3 Pt 1):339-46.Google Scholar
  2. Britten KH, van Wezel RJA. Electrical microstimulation of cortical area mst biases heading perception in monkeys. Nature Neuroscience. 1998 May;1(1):59-63.Google Scholar
  3. Crick F, Koch C. Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex. 1998 Mar;8(2):97-107.Google Scholar
  4. Goebel R, Khorram-Sefat D, Muckli L, Hacker H, Singer W. The constructive nature of vision: direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery. European Journal of Neuroscience. 1998 May;10(5):1563-73.Google Scholar
  5. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology. 1968 Mar;195(1):215-43.Google Scholar
  6. Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. Activation in human mt/mst by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000 Jan;12(1):48-55.Google Scholar
  7. McAdams CJ, Maunsell JH. Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2000 Mar;83(3):1751-5.Google Scholar
  8. Salzman CD, Murasugi CM, Britten KH, Newsome WT. Microstimulation in visual area mt: effects on direction discrimination performance. Jounal of Neuroscience.1992 Jun;12(6):2331-55.Google Scholar
  9. Schiller PH. The effects of V4 and middle temporal (mt) area lesions on visual performance in the rhesus monkey. Visual Neuroscience. 1993 Jul-Aug;10(4):717-46.Google Scholar
  10. Simons DJ. Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Apr;4(4):147-155.Google Scholar
  11. Treisman AM, Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit Psychol 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136.Google Scholar
  12. Treue S, Martinez Trujillo JC. Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature. 1999 Jun 10;399(6736):575-9.Google Scholar
  13. Treue S, Maunsell JH. Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas mt and mst. Nature. 1996 Aug 8;382(6591):539-41.Google Scholar
  14. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Analysis of visual behavior, ed Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RWJ. 1982:pp. S49-86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Zihl J, von Cramon D, Mai N. Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain. 1983 Jun;106 (Pt 2):313-40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard van Wezel
    • 1
  • Frank Kupper
  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations