Proceedings: Plant Sciences

, Volume 100, Issue 6, pp 375–378 | Cite as

Laboratory experiments on competition between two rhizoplane microfungiPenicillium chrysogenum andTrichoderma harzianum

  • Partha Banerjee


A field study of rhizoplane microfungi associated with little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash), a common tallgrass prairie species, had indicated thatPenicillium chrysogenum Thom andTrichoderma harzianum Rifai outcompeted each other in unfumigated and fumigated soils, respectively. To investigate the mechanisms of competition, interactions between the two fungi were studied in laboratory experiments using an artificial model system. Mutual suppression did occur. The first-inoculated fungus was less affected. Some detrimental residual effects on the growth of one species were observed when it was grown along with the killed mass of the other in the same medium.


Competition methyl bromide microfungi rhizoplane Penicillium Trichoderma 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amstutz F C 1968 Applicators for methyl bromide;Down Earth Winter 15–16Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong R A 1976 Fugitive species: Experiments with fungi and some theoretical considerations;Ecology 57 953–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandyopadhyay P 1987Effects of soil fumigation and inorganic nutrients on root surface mycoflora of little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash), Masters thesis, Illinois State University, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  4. Brian P W 1960 Antagonistic and competitive mechanisms limiting survival and activity of fungi in soil; inEcology of soil fungi (eds) D Parkinson and J S Waid (Liverpool: University Press) pp 115–129Google Scholar
  5. Cook R J and Snyder W C 1965 Influence of host exudates on growth and survival of germlings ofFusarium solani fphaseoli in soil;Phytopathology 55 1021–1025Google Scholar
  6. Czachor M 1986a The occurrence of toxin-producing fungi in soil environments of selected field and grass ecosystems;Acta Agrar. Silvestria. Ser. Agrar. 24 73–84Google Scholar
  7. Czachor M 1986b The effect of metabolites of selected toxin-producing fungi on some soil microorganisms and cultivated plants;Acta Agrar. Silvestria. Ser. Agrar. 24 85–94Google Scholar
  8. Ebben M H, Gandy D G and Spencer D M 1983 Toxicity of methyl bromide to soil-borne fungi;Plant Pathol. 32 429–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitter A H, Atkinson D, Read D J and Usher M B (eds) 1985Ecological iteractions in soil (Oxford: Blackwell)Google Scholar
  10. Gandy D G and Chanter D O 1976 Some effects of time, temperature of treatment and fumigant concentration on the fungicidal properties of methyl bromide;Ann. Appl. Biol. 82 279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pitt J A 1985A laboratory guide to common Penicillium species (New South Wales: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Division of Food Research)Google Scholar
  12. Rifai M A 1969 A revision of the genusTrichoderma;Mycol. Pap. 116, 1–56Google Scholar
  13. Rovira A D 1969 Plant root exudates;Bot. Rev. 35 35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tribe H T 1966 Interactions of soil fungi on cellulose film;Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 47 381–391Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Partha Banerjee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations