Are there intellectual precursors to the idea of second best optimization?
Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
- 27 Downloads
Keywords
Lagrange Multiplier Welfare Economic Good Argument Normative Economic Original Edition
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- R. Auspitz and R. Lieben (1889): Untersuchungen über die Theorie des Preises, Leipzig.Google Scholar
- E. Barone (1935): The Ministry of Production in the Collectivist State, in: F. A. v. Hayek (ed.): Collectivist Economic Planning, London, pp. 245–290 (Italian edition 1908).Google Scholar
- M. Blaug (1978): Economic Theory in Retrospect, Third edition, Cambridge (First edition 1962).Google Scholar
- M. St. Braun (1929): Theorie der staatlichen Wirtschaftspolitik, Leipzig — Vienna.Google Scholar
- J. Creedy (1980): Some Recent Interpretations of Mathematical Psychics, HOPE12, pp. 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- P. C. Dooley (1983): Slutsky’s Equation is Pareto’s Solution, HOPE15, pp. 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- F. Y. Edgeworth (1881): Mathematical Psychics, London.Google Scholar
- F. Y. Edgeworth (1925): On the Application of Mathematics to Political Economy (Original edition 1889), in: Papers Relating to Political Economy, Vol. II, London, pp. 273–312.Google Scholar
- I. Fisher (1892): Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices, from Transactions of the Connecticut Academy, Vol. IX, July.Google Scholar
- G. v. Haberler (1933): Der Internationale Handel, Enzyklopädie der Rechts- und Staatswissenschaft XLI, Berlin.Google Scholar
- F. A. v. Hayek (1944): The Road to Serfdom, London.Google Scholar
- J. R. Hicks and R. G. D. Allen (1934): A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value, Economica1, pp. 52–75, 196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- J. R. Hicks (1939): Value and Capital, Oxford.Google Scholar
- W. Hildenbrand (1974): Core and Equilibria of a Large Economy, Princeton.Google Scholar
- H. Hotelling (1931): The Economics of Exhaustible Resources, Journal of Political Economy39, pp. 137–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- H. Hotelling (1935): Demand Functions with Limited Budgets, Econometrica3, pp. 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- T. C. Koopmans (1957): Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, New York.Google Scholar
- O. Lange (1942): The Foundations of Welfare Economics, Econometrica10, pp. 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R. G. Lipsey and R. K. Lancaster (1956/57: The General Theory of Second Best, Review of Economic Studies24, pp. 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- I. M. D. Little (1950/1957): A Critique of Welfare Economics, Oxford.Google Scholar
- T. R. Malthus (1798): An Essay on the Principle of Populations, As It Affects the Future Improvement of Society, London.Google Scholar
- A. Marshall (1890): Principles of Economics, London.Google Scholar
- J. E. Meade (1955): Trade and Welfare, The Theory of International Economic Policy, Vol. II, Oxford.Google Scholar
- C. Menger (1871): Grundsätze der Volkswirthschaftslehre, Vienna.Google Scholar
- L. v. Mises (1929): Kritik des Interventionismus, Jena.Google Scholar
- E. J. Mishan (1962): Second Thoughts on Second Best, Oxford Economic Papers, N. S.14, pp. 205–217.Google Scholar
- E. J. Mishan (1981): Introduction to Normative Economics, Oxford.Google Scholar
- O. Morgenstern (1944): Die Grenzen der Wirtschaftspolitik, Beiträge zur Konjunkturforschung Nr. 5, Vienna.Google Scholar
- Th. Mun (1949): England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade, Reprinted edition, London (Original edition 1664).Google Scholar
- V. Pareto (1927): Manuel d’Economie Politique, Second edition, Paris (First edition 1909; Italian edition 1906).Google Scholar
- A. C. Pigou (1920): The Economics of Welfare, London (Original edition: Wealth and Welfare, London 1912).Google Scholar
- K. R. Popper (1945): The Open Society and Its Enemies, London.Google Scholar
- F. Ramsey (1927): A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation, Economic Journal37, pp. 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- D. Ricardo (1817): On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London.Google Scholar
- L. Robbins (1932): An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London.Google Scholar
- P. A. Samuelson (1938): Welfare Economics and International Trade, American Economic Review28, pp. 261–266.Google Scholar
- P. A. Samuelson (1947): Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- H. Schultz (1935): Interrelations of Demand, Price, and Income, Journal of Political Economy43, pp. 433–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- J. A. Schumpeter (1926): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Second edition, Munich — Leipzig (First edition Leipzig 1912).Google Scholar
- J. A. Schumpeter (1954): History of Economic Analysis, E. B. Schumpeter (ed.), Oxford.Google Scholar
- M. Shubik (1959): Edgeworth Market Games, in: R. D. Luce and A. W. Tucker (eds.): Contributions to the Theory of Games, Annals of Mathematical Studies40, Princeton, pp. 267–278.Google Scholar
- E. E. Slutsky (1915): Sulla teoria del bilancio del consumatore, Giornale degli Economisti51, pp. 1–26. (English translation in: Readings in Price Theory, Homewood 1952, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar
- A. Smith (1976): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Glasgow edition, Oxford. (Original edition London 1776).Google Scholar
- A. Smithies (1936): The Boundaries of the Production and utility Function, in: Exploration in Economics, London.Google Scholar
- J. Steuart (1767): An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy, London.Google Scholar
- V. J. Tarascio (1972): A Correction: On the Genealogy of the So-Called Edgeworth-Bowley Diagram, Western Economic Journal10, pp. 193 sqq.Google Scholar
- R. J. Turgot (1844): Observations sur le Mémoire de M. de Saint-Pérary, in: Oeuvres, E. Daire et H. Dussard (eds.), Paris, pp. 418–433 (Original edition 1767).Google Scholar
- L. Walras (1874): Eléments d’Économie Politique Pure, Lausanne.Google Scholar
- F. A. v. Wieser (1914): Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Wirtschaft, Grundriß der Sosialökonomik, 1. Abt., 2. Teil, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag 1986