Advertisement

The effect of Ammonium on the potassium content of unstriated muscle and its relation to the contraction produced on withdrawal of chemical substances from around the muscle

  • S. K. Gokhale
  • Inderjit Singh
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Summary

  1. (1)

    In frog stomach muscle, ammonium enters the cells and replaces potassium; this is associated with the ammonium withdrawal contraction having the properties of the A.C. contraction.

     
  2. (2)

    In dog muscle there is no significant difference between the potassium contents of muscles soaked in normal saline, and in ammonium-rich saline respectively; with this is probably associated the absence in dog muscle of the ammonium withdrawal contraction having the properties of the A.C. contraction.

     
  3. (3)

    Ammonium causes greater replacement of potassium than the tetra-ammonium salts; with this is probably associated the fact that the latter do not produce a contraction on withdrawal, similar to that of ammonium in frog muscle. Withdrawal of the latter salt produces a tonic contraction similar to that produced by withdrawal of ammonium in dog muscle.

     
  4. (4)

    There is greater loss of potassium produced by ammonium in alkaline than in acid solutions; but there is greater loss of potassium in a potassium-free saline in acid solutions. As the ammonium withdrawl contraction in frog muscle is more marked in acid than in alkaline solutions, it suggests that the contraction is due to the outward passage of the ammonium ion.

     
  5. (5)

    Slow relaxation of a contraction produced by a chemical substance may be due to tonic contraction on withdrawal of the substance or to persistence of the previous contraction, probably due to increase in viscosity of the muscle.

     

Keywords

Potassium Content Slow Relaxation Spontaneous Contraction Tonic Contraction Frog Muscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ConstantinoBiochem. Zeitschr., 1911,37, 52.Google Scholar
  2. CummingsBiochem. Journ., 1939,33, 642.Google Scholar
  3. Fenn, W. O.Amer. J. Physiol., 1938,24, 213.Google Scholar
  4. — and Cobb, D. —, 1936,115, 345.Google Scholar
  5. Ing, H. R., and Wright, W. M.Proc. Roy. Soc. B,93, 104.Google Scholar
  6. KatzArch. b. d. ges. Physiol, 1896,58. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Singh, I.J. Physiol., 1938a,91, 398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. —, 1938b,92, 62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. —, 1938c,92, 232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. —, 1938d,92, 241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. —, 1938e,94, 1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. —, 1938f,94, 322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. —, 1939a,96, 1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. —, 1939b,96, 367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. —, 1940,98, 155.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1945

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Gokhale
    • 1
    • 2
  • Inderjit Singh
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Haffkine InstituteBombay
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyDow Medical CollegeHyderabad, Sind

Personalised recommendations