Advertisement

Generalized theory of interference, and its applications

Part I. Coherent pencils
  • S. Pancharatnam
Article

Summary

The superposition of two coherent beams in different states of elliptic polarisation is discussed in a general manner. If A and B represent the states of polarisation of the given beams on the Poincaré sphere, and C that of the resultant beam, the result is simply expressed in terms of the sides,a, b, c of the spherical triangle ABC. The intensity I of the resultant beam is given by:
$$I = I_1 + I_2 + 2 \sqrt {I_1 I_2 } \cos \raise.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$}\kern-.1em/ \kern-.15em\lower.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$} c cos \delta ;$$
the extent of mutual interference thus varies from a maximum for identically polarised beams (c = 0), to zero for oppositely polarised beams (c = π). The state of polarisation C of the resultant beam is located by sin2 1/2a = (I1/I) sin2 1/2c and sin2 1/2b = (I2/I) sin2 1/2c. The ‘phase difference’ δ is equal to the supplement of half the area of the triangle C′BA (where C′ is the point diametrically opposite to C). These results also apply to the converse problem of the decomposition of a polarised beam into two others.

The interference of two coherent beams after resolution into the same state of elliptic polarisation by an elliptic analyser or compensator is discussed; as also the interference (direct,and after resolution by an analyser) ofn coherent pencils in different states of polarisation.

Keywords

Phase Advance Polarise Beam Coherent Beam Elliptic Polarisation Linear Vibration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chandrasekhar, S.Radiative Transfer, Oxford, 1949.Google Scholar
  2. Fano, U.J. Opt. Soc. Am., 1949,39, 859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jerrard, H. G. —, 1954,44, 634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mascart, E.Traite d’Optique, Paris, 1891,2. Google Scholar
  5. M’Clelland, W. J. and Preston, T.A Treatise on Spherical Trigonometry with Applications to Spherical Geometry, 1897, PartsI andII, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Pancharatnam, S.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1955,42 A, 235.Google Scholar
  7. Perrin, F.J. Chem. Phys., 1942,10, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pockels, F.Lehrbuch der Kristalloptik, Teubner, 1906.Google Scholar
  9. Ramachandran, G. N. and Ramaseshan, S.J. Opt. Soc. Am., 1952,42, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ramachandran, G. N.J. Madras Univ., 1952,22 B, 277.Google Scholar
  11. RayleighScientific Papers, Cambridge, 1902,3, 140.Google Scholar
  12. Stokes, G. G.Mathematical and Physical Papers, Cambridge, 1901,3, 233.Google Scholar
  13. Walker, J.Analytical Theory of Light, Cambridge, 1904.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1956

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Pancharatnam
    • 1
  1. 1.Memoir No. 88 of the Raman Research InstituteBangalore-6

Personalised recommendations