Herz

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 211–216 | Cite as

Transmyocardial laser revascularization and rehabilitation

  • T. Kruse
  • H. Höffken
  • R. Moosdorf
  • C. Bethge
  • B. Maisch
Therapie der Terminalen Herzerkrankung. Teil I
  • 18 Downloads

Summary

Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) is a new technique for patients with CAD or heart attack to revascularise ischemic areas of the myocardium in which the localisation or the condition of the vessels does not allow bypass grafting.

This study shows the results in observation of patients before and during the first 3 months after TMLR. Of 110 patients operated on from 1994 to 1996, 86 were evaluated for well-being (quality of life), using NYHA-and CCS-classification, stress test and nitril-scintigraphy at rest and under stress conditions. 51 patients, of whom 11 were females, underwent TMLR combined with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). 35 male patients were treated singularly with TMLR. The average age in both groups was 59 years (±23). All patients were subject to phase I rehabilitation in specialised institutions after being mobilised in the operating hospital. The evaluations took place on the day of admission to the hospital prior to surgery, within 10 days after surgery and 3 months following. The average stay in the rehabilitation-institution was between 4 and 6 weeks.

Our findings demonstrate that both groups profited from the procedures, while the TMLR/CABG group showed a faster recovery and a better outcome. In comparison to 57% of the TMLR group, 85% of the patients in the TMLR/CABG group reported an improvement ranging from good to significant in quality of life assessments. The TMLR/CABG rated from an average of initially 3.4 (±0.6) to 2.1 (±0.8) after 3 months at NYHA-and 3.3 (±0.7) to 1.7 (±0.8) at CCS-classification. The TMLR group rated from 3.6 (±0.5) to 2.4 (±0.8) in NHYA- and from 3.4 (±0.5) to 1.9 (±0.7) on the CSS-scales. A remarkable improvement was noted in the stress test with an increase in power and endurance from 21 to 89 watts for the combined group and 8 to 81 watts for the TMLR treated patients, who generally recovered more slowly. The perfusion scan showed the same tendencies as previously reported but in some cases the results were not congruent with other findings.

Overall, our findings indicate that there is a benefit for terminally symptomatic CAD patients after TMLR, but an observation period of 3 months does not allow for final conclusions on this matter. Rehabilitation seems to be of value for TMLR-patients since they have shown a markedly better performance following 3-month treatment, but further data from clinical randomised trials are needed to determine the influence of TMLR with short- and long-term rehabilitation on the prognosis of the disease.

Key Words

Transmyocardial laser revascularisation Rehabilitation Quality of life Stress test Perfusion scan NYHA- and CCS-classification Prognosis 

Transmyokardiale Laserrevakularisation und Rehabilitation

Zusammenfassung

Die transmyokardiale Laserrevaskularisation (TMLR) ermöglicht eine Revaskularisierung von ischämischen Myokardarealen, bei denen eine Gefäßrevaskularisation aufgrund von Lokalisation oder Zustand des Gefäßsystems nicht in Frage kommt.

Von 110 Patienten, die 1994 bis 1996 in Marburg mittels TMLR operiert wurden, wurden 86 (51 mit Kombination von TMLR mit aortokoronarem Bypass [ACB] und 35 mit alleiniger TMLR) anschließen in eine Rehabilitationseinrichtung veriegt. Die vorliegende Untersuchung geht der Frage nach, ob Patienten von einer TMLR in Verbindung mit Frührehabilitation profitieren. Über einen Beobachtungszeitraum von drei Monaten wurden der Verlauf von Lebensqualität, Beschwerdesymptomatik nach NYHA- und CCS-Klassifikation, Belastbarkeit am Fahrradergometer und Myokardperfusion mittels Myokardszintigraphie untersucht. Hierbei zeigte sich, daß beide Gruppen von den durchgeführten Maßnahmen profitierten, wobei sich die zusätzlich bypass-operierten Patienten insgesamt schneller erholten.

Dies gibt Anlaß zu der Vermutung, daß Patienten von einer TMLR profitieren und daß je nach Schwere der zugrundeliegenden Erkrankung Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen von Vorteil sind.

Schlüsselwörter

Transmyokardiale Laserrevaskularisation Rehabilitation Lebensqualität Fahrradergometer Myokardszintigraphie NYHA- und CCS-Klassifikation Prognose 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Anderson D, Deshaies G, Jobin J. Social support, social networks and coronary artery disease rehabilitation: a review. Can J Cardiol 1996;12:739–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayanian JZ, Guadagnoli E, Cleary PD. Physical and psychosocial functioning of women and men after coronary bypass surgery. JAMA 1995;274:1767–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broustet J, Monpere C. Cooperative survey of the results of coronary surgery during cardiac rehabilitation. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1994;87:1267–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Denollet J. Health complaints and outcome assessment in coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med 1994;56:463–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubach P, Myers J, Dziekan G, Goerre S, Buser P, Lasker A. Effect of residential cardiac rehabilitation following bypass surgery. Observations in Switzerland. Chest 1995;108:1434–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    FitzGibbon G, Keon W. Shared care for open heart surgery: 21 years of experience. Can J Cardiol 1996;12:59–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foster C, Oldridge N, Dion W et al. Time course of recovery during cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1995;15: 209–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frazier OH, Cooley D, Kadipasaoglu K et al. Myocardial revascularization with laser. Preliminary findings. Circulation 1995; 92:Suppl:1158–65.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goodman LS, McKenzie DC, Nath CR, Schamberger W, Traunton JE, Ammann WC. Central adaptation in aerobic circuits versus walking/jogging trained cardiac patients. Can J Appl Physiol 1995;XX:178–97.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffith D, Hampton D, Schwitzer M, Daniels J. Facilitating the recovery of open heart surgery patients through quality improvement efforts and CareMAP implementation. Am J Crit Care 1996;5:346–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hellman E, Williams M. Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients. Heart Lung 1994;23:506–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horvath KA, Mannting F, Cunnings N, Shernan SH, Cohn LH. Transmyocardial laser revascularization: operation techniques and clinical results at two years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:1047–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jenkins C, Stanton B, Jono R. Quantifying and predicting recovery after heart surgery. Psychosom Med 1994;56:203–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lavie CJ, Milani RV. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation programs on exercise capacity, coronary risk factors, behavioral characteristics, and quality of life in a large elderly cohort. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:177–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maines TY, Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Cassidy MM, Gilliland Y, Murgo J. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise programs on exercise capacity, coronary risk factors, behavior and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. South Med J 1997;90:43–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trehan N, Mishra M, Kohli V, Mishra A, Jangid D, Bapna R. Transmyocardial laser revascularisation as an adjunct to CABG. Indian Heart J 1996;48:381–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szmedra I, Bacharach DW, Buckenmeyer PJ, Hermann DT, Ehrich DA. Response of patients with coronary artery disease stratified by ejection fraction following short-term training. Int J Cardiol 1994;46:209–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wenger NK. Guidelines for exercise training of elderly patients with coronary artery disease. South Med J 1994;87:66–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wosornu D, Bedford D, Ballantyne D. A comparison of the effects of strength and aerobic exercise training on exercise capacity and lipids after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur Heart J 1996;17:854–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maisch B, Funck RC, Schönian U, Moosdorf R. Indikationen zur transmyokardialen Lasertherapie. Z Kardiol 1996;85:Suppl 6: 269–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Urban & Vogel 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Kruse
    • 1
  • H. Höffken
    • 3
  • R. Moosdorf
    • 2
  • C. Bethge
    • 4
  • B. Maisch
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung Innere Medizin-KardiologieUniversitätsklinikMarburg
  2. 2.Klinik für HerzchirurgieHerzzentrum der Phillipps-Universität MarburgMarburg
  3. 3.Abteilung für NuklearmedizinHerzzentrum der Phillipps-Universität MarburgMarburg
  4. 4.Jüdisches KrankenhausBerlin

Personalised recommendations