Advertisement

Andrologie

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 154–163 | Cite as

Approche clinique d'une OAT

  • R. Mieusset
  • L. Bujan
  • M. Daudin
  • G. Massat
  • A. Mansat
  • F. Pontonnier
Gametes Males: Production et Qualite
  • 73 Downloads

Resume

L'oligozoospermie (ou OAT) est un tableau biologique souvent observé chez les hommes inféconds. Cette OAT peut être la conséquence de différents facteurs mis en évidence par l'anamnèse, l'examen clinique et le spermogramme. L'anamnèse révèle les antécédents infectieux, de cryptorchidie, de cure chirurgicale d'hydrocèle ou de hernie inguinale, facteurs potentiels d'OAT. L'examen clinique peut montrer l'existence d'un varicocèle dont le traitement est à envisager en cas d'association avec une OAT. Enfin l'infection du sperme est un tableau dont le diagnostic et le traitement restent difficiles. En l'absence de ces facteurs potentiels d'OAT, le diagnostic d'OAT idiopathique est facilement posé, comme le montrent trois exemples d'OAT faussement idiopathiques: les obstructions unilatérales des épididymes ou des déférents, les obstructions partielles des canaux éjaculateurs et les pathologies thermiques des testicules. L'examen clinique de l'homme infécond reste un élément indispensable avant toute indication d'assistance médicale à la procréation.

Mots clés

Oligozoospermie Anamnèse Examen clinique Infection du sperme OAT faussement idiopathiques 

Abstract

The clinical approach of the male partner of infertile couples seems to be still a problem. Indeed, clinical history and examination are too often lacking. Such an attitude induces that the treatment of male infertility tends to be based for most part on the examination of seminal fluid alone. With the consequence that the treatment of the semen rather the man is the focus of attention. Oligozoospermia (OAT) is a common finding among infertile men. This OAT can be due to factors that may be found through anamnesis, clinical examination and semen analysis. Anamnesis indicates history of cryptorchidism, urogenital infections, surgery for inguinal hernia. One of the most studied factors that can be found during clinical examination is varicocele, and recent data indicate that the surgical treatment of varicocele when associated with OAT could be beneficial to fertility of infertile men. Semen infection, a difficult diagnosis mainly based on bacteriospermia and leukospermia, could benefit from other diagnosis tools such as echography of the male reproductive tract and biochemical markers of the seminal plasma.

Finally, when no potential factors responsible for an OAT are found, such an OAT is named “idiopathic”. However, some of these “idiopathic OAT” are false idiopathic OAT, as shown through three examples, such as unilateral testicular obstruction, partial ejaculatory duct obstruction and thermal pathologies of the testes, when anamnesis and clinical examination are adequately associated with semen analysis.

Key words

Oligozoospermia Anamnesis Clinical examination Semen analysis Infertility 

References

  1. 1.
    Aafjes J.H., Van der Vijver J.C.M.: Fertility of men with and without varicocele. Fertil. Steril., 1985, 43, 901–904.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abramsson L., Duchek M., Lundgren B.: Conception rate for infertile couples. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1989, 23, 165–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker H.W.G., Burger H.G., de Kretser D.M., Hudson B., Rennie G.C., Straffon W.G.E.: Testicular vein ligation and fertility in men with varicoceles. Br. Med. J., 1985, 291, 1678–1680.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barratt C.L.R., Bolton A.E., Cooke I.D.: Functionnal significance of white blood cells in the male and female reproductive tract. Hum. Reprod., 1990, 5, 639–648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chauchan M., Barratt C.L.R., Cooke S., Cooke I.D.: A rationalized and objective protocol for the recruitment and screening of semen donors for an AID programme. Hum. Reprod., 1988, 3, 873–876.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chehval M.J., Purcell M.H.: Deterioration of semen parameters over time in men with untreated varicocele: evidence of progressive testicular damage. Fertil. Steril., 1992, 57, 174–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chilvers C., Dudley N.E., Gough M.H., Jackson M.B., Pike M.C.: Undescended testis: the effect of treatment on subsequent risk of subfertility and malignancy. J. Pediat. Surg., 1986, 21, 691–696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christiansen E., Tollefsrud A., Purvis K.: Sperm quality in men with chronic bacterial prostatovesiculifis verified by rectal ultrasonography. Urol., 1992, 38, 545–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clarke B.G.: Incidence of varicocele in normal men and among men of different ages. J.A.M.A., 1966, 198, 1121–1122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cockett A.T.K., Urry R.L., Dougherty K.A.: The varicocele and semen characteristics. J. Urol., 1979, 121, 435–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    COMHAIRE F., ZALATA A., MAHMOUD A., DEPOORTER B., HUYSSE L., CHRISTOPHE A. ET AL.: Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to moderate and severe male subfertility in 1995. In Ombelet W., Vereecken A. eds. Modern Andrology. Oxford University Press, 1995, 144–150.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    CSM: Données non publiées du Centre de Stérilité masculine. Hôpital La Grave, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cummins J.M., Jequier A.M.: Treating male infertility needs more clinical andrology, not less. Human. Reprod., 1994, 9, 1214–1219.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daudin M., Bujan L., Chap H., et al.: Intérêt du dosage des marqueurs du plasma séminal dans l'évaluation de la pathologie fonctionnelle chez l'homme infécond non azoosperme. 87è Congrès d'Urologie, Paris, 1993. Progrès en Urologie vol. 3, 5, suppl, p. 129.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dubin L., Amelar R.D.: Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil. Steril., 1977, 22, 469–474.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dubin L., Amelar R.D.: Varicocelectomy: 986 cases in a twelve year study. Urology, 1977, 10, 446–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ducot B., Spira A., Feneux D., Jouannet P.: Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. II. Study of clinical characteristics — practical consequences. Int. J. Androl., 1988, 11, 395–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elder J.S.: Epididymal anomalies associated with hydrocele/hernia and cryptorchidism: implications regarding testicular descent. J. Urol., 1992, 148, 624–626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gorelick J.I., Goldstein M.: Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil. Steril., 1993, 59, 613–616.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hargreave T.B.: Varicocele. A clinical enigma. Br. J. Urol., 1993, 72, 401–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hendry W.F., Parslow J.M., Parkinson M.C., Lowe D.G.: Unilateral testicular obstruction: orchidectomy or reconstruction? Hum. Reprod., 1994, 9, 463–470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hendry W.F., Sommerville I.F., Hall R.R., Pugh R.C.B.: Investigation and treatment of the subfertile men. Br. J. Urol., 1973, 45, 648–692.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hirsch A.V., Pryor J.P.: Are there different types of varicocele? In Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Andrology, Tel Aviv Israel J. Med. Sci., 1981, 17, no 8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson D.P., Pohl D.R., Rivera-Correa H.: Varicocele: an innocuous condition? South Med. J., 1970, 63, 34–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnson W.: 120 infertile men. Br. J. Urol., 1975, 47, 230–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klaiber P.L., Broverman D.M., Pokoly T.B., Albert A.J., Howard P.J., Sherer J.F.: Interrelationships of cigarette smoking, testicular varicoceles, and seminal fluid indexes. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 47, 481–485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kursch E.: What is the incidence of varicocele in a fertile population? Fertil. Steril., 1987, 48, 510–511.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lewis E.L.: The Ivanissevitch operation. J. Urol., 1950, 63, 165–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lipshultz J.I., Corriere J.N.: Progressive testicular atrophy in the varicocele patient. J. Urol., 1977, 117, 175–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Magdar I., Weissenberg R., Lunenfeld B., Karasik A., Goldwasser B.: Controlled trial of high spermatic vein ligation for varicocele in infertile men. Fertil. Steril., 1995, 63, 120–124.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marks J.L., McMahon R., Lipshultz L.I.: Predictive parameters of successful varicocele repair. J. Urol., 1986, 136, 609–612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Matsuda T., Horii Y., Yoshida O.: Unilateral obstruction of the vas deferens caused by childhood inguinal herniorrhaphy in male infertily patients. Fertil. Steril., 1992, 58, 609–613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meacham R.B., Townsend R.R., Rademacker D., Drose J.A.: The incidence of varicocele in the general population when evaluated by physical examinations gray scale sonography and color doppler sonography. J. Urol., 1994, 151, 1535–1538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meacham R.B., Hellerstein D.K., Lipshultz R.I.: Evaluation and treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction in the infertile male. Fertil. Steril., 1993, 59, 393–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mieusset R., Bujan L.: The potential of mild testicular heating as a safe, effective and reversible contraceptive method formen. Int. J. Androl., 1994, 17, 186–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mieusset R., Bujan L., Massat A., Mansat A., Pontonnier F.: Clinical and biological characteristics of infertile men with a history of cryptorchidism. Hum. Reprod., 1995, 10, 613–619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mieusset R., Bujan L., Mansat A., Pontonnier F., Grandjean H.: Hyperthermia and spermatogenesis: enhancement of the inhibitory effect obtained by “artificial cryptorchidism”. Int. J. Androl., 1987, 10, 571–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mieusset R., Bujan L., Mondinot C., Mansat A., Pontonnier F., Grandjean H.: Association of scrotal hyperthermia with impaired spermatogenesis in infertile men. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 48, 1006–1011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mieusset R., Bujan L., Plantavid M., Grandjean H.: Increased levels of serum FSH and LH associated with intrinsic testicular hyperthermia in oligospermic infertile men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 1989, 68, 419–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mortimer D.: The essential partnership between diagnostic andrology and modern assisted reproductive technologies. Hum. Reprod., 1994, 9, 1209–1213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nieschlag E., Hertle L., Fischedick A., Behre H.M.: Treatment of varicocele: counselling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica. Hum. Reprod., 1995, 10, 347–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nilsson S., Edvinson A., Nilsson B.: Improvement of semen and pregnancy rate after ligation and division of the internal spermatic vein: fact or fiction? Br. J. Urol., 1979, 51, 591–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Okuyama A., Fujisue H., Matsui T., Takeyama M., Nakamura M., Namiki M., Fujioka H., Matsuda M.: Surgical repair of varicocele: effective treatment for subfertile men in a controlled study. Eur. Urol., 1988, 14, 298–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    OMS: Management of male infertility. Int. J. Androl., 1987 Suppl. (August) 1–53.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    OMS: The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. Fertil. Steril., 1992, 57, 1289–1293.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Purvis K., Christiansen E.: Infection in the male reproductive tract. Impact, diagnosis and treatment in relation to male infertility. Int. J. Androl., 1993, 16, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rodriguez-Rigau L., Steinberger E.: Relationship of varicocele to sperm output and fertility of male partners in infertile couples. J. Urol., 1978, 120, 691–694.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stewart B.H.: Varicocele in infertility: incidence and results of surgical therapy. J. Urol., 1974, 112, 222–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Thomason M., Farris B.L.: The prevalence of varicocele in a group of healthy young men. Milit. Med., 1979, 144, 181–186.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Thonneau P., Ducot B., Spira A.: Risk factors in men and women consulting for infertility. Int. J. Fertil., 1993, 38, 37–43.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Uehling D.T.: Fertility in men with varicocele. Int. J. Fertil., 1968, 13, 58–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wolff H., Politch J.A., Martinez A., Haimovici F., Hill J., Anderson J.: Leukocytospermia is associated with poor semen quality. Fertil. Steril., 1990, 53, 528–536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wutz J.: Epidemiology of idiopathic varicocele. In Jecht E.W., Zeitler E. eds., Varicocele and Male Infertility. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1982, 2–12.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yavetz H., Harash B., Yogev L., Homonnai Z.T., Paz G.: Fertility of men following inguinal hernia repair. Andrologia, 1991, 23, 443–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zorgniotti A.W., Cohen M.S., Sealfon A.I.: Chronic scrotal hypothermia: results in 90 infertile couples. J. Urol., 1986, 135, 944–947.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société d’Andrologie de Langue Française 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Mieusset
    • 1
  • L. Bujan
    • 1
  • M. Daudin
    • 1
  • G. Massat
    • 1
  • A. Mansat
    • 2
  • F. Pontonnier
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre de Stérilité MasculineHôpital de la GraveToulouse cedex
  2. 2.CECOS Midi-pyrénéesHôpital de la GraveToulouse cedex

Personalised recommendations