Journal of Population Research

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 1–24 | Cite as

Policy responses to low fertility and its consequences: A global survey

Article

Abstract

Fertility at or below replacement level now characterizes 64 countries with populations totalling 44 per cent of that of the world. Many of these countries have total fertility rates below 1.5 and some have recorded below-replacement fertility for decades. It appears likely that some countries will eventually adopt policies aimed at raising fertility. Accordingly, the paper examines the effect of past policies of this type, and briefly looks to the future.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbasi-Shavazi, Jalal and Peter McDonald. 1997. Fertility and multiculturalism: immigrant fertility in Australia. Paper presented at International Union for, the Scientific Study of Population International Population Conference, Beijing.Google Scholar
  2. Andorka, Rudolf and Gyorgy Vukovich. 1985. The impact of population policy on fertility in Hungary, 1960–1980. Pp. 403–412 inInternational Population Conference, Florence 1985, Vol. 3. Liège: IUSSP.Google Scholar
  3. Ariès, Philippe. 1980. Two successive motivations for the declining birth rate in the West.Population and Development Review 6(4): 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avdeev, Alexandre and Alain Monnier. 1995. A survey of modern Russian fertility.Population. An English Selection 7: 39–66.Google Scholar
  5. Berelson, Bernard (ed.). 1974.Population Policy in Developed Countries. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Berelson, B. 1979. Romania’s 1966 anti-abortion decree: the demographic experience of the first decade.Population Studies 33(2): 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Betts, Katharine. 1989. Does Australia’s low fertility matter?Journal of the Australian Population Association 6(2): 102–121.Google Scholar
  8. Bongaarts, John and Griffith Feeney. 1998. On the quantum and tempo of fertility.Population and Development Review 24(2): 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourgeois-Pichat, Jean. 1974. France. Pp. 545–591 in B. Berelson (ed.),Population Policy in Developed Countries. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Bourgeois-Pichat, Jean. 1986. The unprecedented shortage of births in Europe. Pp. 3–25 in K. Davis, M.S. Bernstam and R. Ricardo-Campbell (eds),Below Replacement Fertility in Industrial Societies: Causes, Consequences and Policies. Supplement toPopulation and Development Review 12.Google Scholar
  11. Bracher, Michael and Gigi Santow. 1991. Fertility desires and fertility outcomes.Journal of the Australian Population Association 8(1): 33–49.Google Scholar
  12. Bumpass, Larry L. 1990. What’s happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change.Demography 27(4): 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Büttner, Thomas and Wolfgang Lutz. 1990. Estimating fertility responses to policy measures in the German Democratic Republic.Population and Development Review 16(3): 539–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caldwell, John C. 1981. The mechanisms of demographic change in historical perspective.Population Studies 35(1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caldwell, John C. 1982. An explanation of the continued fertility decline in the West: stages, succession and crisis. Pp. 233–266 in J.C. Caldwell,Theory of Fertility Decline. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Caldwell, John C. 1993. The Asian fertility transition: its implications for transition theories. Pp. 299–316 in R. Leete and I. Alam (eds),The Revolution in Asian Fertility: Dimensions, Causes and Implications. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  17. Caldwell, John C. 2001. The globalization of fertility behaviour. Pp. 93–115 in R. A. Bulatao and J. B. Casterline (eds),Global Fertility Transition. Supplement toPopulation and Development Review 27.Google Scholar
  18. Calwell, John C. and Pat Caldwell. 1992. What does the Matlab fertility experience really show?Studies in Family Planning 23(5): 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caldwell, John C., Pat Caldwell, Michael Bracher and Gigi Santow. 1988. The contemporary marriage and fertility revolutions in the West: the explanations provided by Australian participants.Journal of the Australian Population Association 5(2): 113–145.Google Scholar
  20. Caldwell, John C. and Lado Ruzicka. 1978. The Australian fertility transition: an analysis.Population and Development Review 4(1): 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Campbell, Arthur A. (ed.). 1980.Social, Economic and Health Aspects of Low Fertility. Washington DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
  22. Casterline, John B., Ronald D. Lee and Karen A. Foote (eds). 1996.Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories. Supplement toPopulation and Development Review 22.Google Scholar
  23. Charles, Enid. 1934.The Menace of Underpopulation. London: Watts.Google Scholar
  24. Chesnais, Jean-Claude. 1990. Demographic transition patterns and their impact on age structure.Population and Development Review 16(2): 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chesnais, Jean-Claude. 1996. Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe.Population and Development Review 22(4): 729–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chesnais, Jean-Claude. 1997a. Determinants of below replacement fertility. Paper presented to UN Expert Group Meeting on Below-Replacement Fertility, New York, 4–6 November.Google Scholar
  27. Chesnais, Jean-Claude 1997b. The future of French fertility: back to the past or a new implosion? Paper presented to UN Expert Group Meeting on Below-Replacement Fertility, New York, 4–6 November.Google Scholar
  28. Clare, Ross and Ashok Tulpulé. 1994. Australia’s ageing society.EPAC Background Paper 37. Canberra: Economic Planning Advisory Council.Google Scholar
  29. Cliquet, R.L. (ed.). 1991.Desirabilities and Possibilities of a Fertility Recovery at Replacement Level in Europe. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  30. Coale, A.J. and P. Demeny. 1996.Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Conrad, Christopher, Michael Lechner and Wolf Werner. 1996. East German fertility after unification: crisis or adaptation.Population and Development Review 22(2): 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Council of Europe. 1978.Population Decline in Europe: Implications of a Declining or Stationary Population. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  33. David, Henry P., Jochen Fleischhacker and Charlotte Höhn. 1988. Abortion and eugenics in Nazi Germany.Population and Development Review 14(1): 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Davis, Kingsley. 1997. Reproductive institutions and the pressure for population.Population and Development Review 23(3): 611–624 (first published inSociological Review, July 1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Davis, Kingsley, Mikhail S. Bernstam and Rita Ricardo-Campbell (eds). 1986.Below Replacement Fertility in Industrial Societies: Causes, Consequences and Policies. Supplement toPopulation and Development Review 12.Google Scholar
  36. Easterlin, Richard. 1968.Population, Labor Force, and Long Swings in Economic Growth. New York. National Bureau for Economic Research.Google Scholar
  37. Espenshade Thomas J. 1978. Zero population growth in the economies of developed nations.Population and Development Review 4(4): 645–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Espenshade, Thomas J. and William J. Serow (eds). 1978.The Economic Consequences of Slowing Population Growth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Esping-Anderson, Gosta (ed.). 1996.Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economics. London. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Folbre, Nancy. 1997. The future of the elephant bird.Population and Development Review 23(3): 647–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Freedman, Ronald. 1995. Asia’s recent fertility decline and prospects for future demographic change.Asia-Pacific Population Research Reports No. 1. Honolulu: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  42. Frejka, Tomas. 1980. Fertility trends and policies: Czechoslovakia in the 1970s.Population and Development Review 6(1): 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gauthier, Anne H. 1991. Family policies in comparative perspective.Discussion Paper No. 5, Oxford: Centre for European Studies, Nuffield College.Google Scholar
  44. Gauthier, Anne H. 1993. Towards renewed fears of population and family decline?European Journal of Population 9: 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gauthier, Anne H. 1996.The State and the Family: A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  46. Glass, D.V. 1967 [1940].Population: Policies and Movements in Europe. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  47. Gornick, Janet C., Marcia K. Meyers and Katharin E. Ross. 1998. Public policies and the employment of mothers: a cross-national study.Social Science Quarterly 79(1): 35–54.Google Scholar
  48. Govindasamy, Pavalavalli and Julie DaVanzo. 1992. Ethnicity and fertility differentials in Peninsular Malaysia: do policies matter?Population and Development Review 18(2): 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gustafsson, Björn and N. Anders Klevmarken. 1993. Taxes and transfers in Sweden: incentive effects on labour supply. Pp. 50–134 in A.B. Atkinson and G.V. Mogensen (eds),Welfare and Work Incentives. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  50. Heitlinger, Alena. 1976. Pro-natalist population policies in Czechoslovakia.Population Studies 30(1): 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hobcraft, John. 1996. Fertility in England and Wales: a fifty-year perspective.Population Studies 50(3): 485–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hoem, Britta and Jan M. Hoem. 1996. Sweden’s family policies and roller-coaster fertility.Journal of Population Problems [China] 52: 1–22.Google Scholar
  53. Hoem, J.M. 1990. Social policy and recent fertility change in Sweden.Population and Development Review 16(4): 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Höhn, Charlotte. 1988. Population policies in advanced societies: pronatalist and migration strategies.European Journal of Population 3: 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ipsen, Carl. 1996.Dictating Demography: The Problem of Population in Fascist Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Japanese Organization for International Cooperation in Family Planning (JOICFP). 1997. Ageing: an update. Tokyo.Google Scholar
  57. Jiang, Zhenghua. 1997. The fertility transition and prospects in China and other East Asian countries. Pp. 153–168 in United Nations,Proceedings of the Expert Group Meeting on Below Replacement Fertility, New York, 4–6 November 1997. ESA/P/WP. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  58. Ladier-Fouladi, Marie. 1997. The fertility transition in Iran.Population: An English Selection 9: 191–214.Google Scholar
  59. Leeuw, Frans L. 1987. On the acceptability and feasibility of pronatalist population policy in the Netherlands: an empirical approach.European Journal of Population 2(3–4): 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lesthaeghe, Ron and Dominique Meekers. 1986 Value changes and the dimensions of familism in the European Community.European Journal of Population 2(3–4): 225–268.Google Scholar
  61. Lesthaeghe, Ron and Johan Surkyn. 1988. Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change.Population and Development Review 14(1): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lesthaeghe, Ron and Paul Willems. 1999. Is low fertility a temporary phenomenon in the European Union?Population and Development Review 25(2): 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McDonald, Peter F. 1998. Contemporary fertility patterns in Australia: first data from the 1996 census.People and Place 6(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
  64. McDonald, Peter F. 2000. Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility.Journal of Population Research 17(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McIntosh, C. Alison. 1981. Low fertility and liberal democracy in Western Europe.Population and Development Review 7(2): 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McIntosh, C. Alison. 1983.Population Policy in Western Europe: Responses to Low Fertility in France, Sweden and West Germany. Armonk NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  67. McIntyre, Robert J. 1975. Pronatalist programmes in Eastern Europe.Soviet Studies 27(3): 366–380.Google Scholar
  68. McNicoll, Geoffrey. 1995.Institutional impediments to population policy in Australia.Working Papers in Demography No. 53. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  69. Monnier, Alain. 1990. The effects of family policies in the German Democratic Republic: a reevaluation.Population 2: 127–140.Google Scholar
  70. Myrdal, Alva and Gunnar Myrdal. 1935.Kris i Befolknigsfragen [Crisis in Population Policy]. Stockholm: Bonnier.Google Scholar
  71. Ogawa, Naohiro and Robert D. Retherford. 1997. Shifting costs of caring for the elderly back to families in Japan: will it work?Population and Development Review 23(1): 59–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Olah, Livia S. 1996. The gendered impact of public policies on the second-birth rates: the case of Sweden (and Hungary). Demography Unit, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  73. Park, Chai Bin and Nam-Hoon Cho. 1995. Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea.Population and Development Review 21(1): 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Population Reference Bureau. 2001.2001 World Population Data Sheet. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  75. Preston, Samuel H. 1984. Children and the elderly: divergent paths for America’s dependents.Demography 21(4): 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Prioux, France. 1990. Fertility and family size in Western Europe.Population: An English Selection 2: 141–161.Google Scholar
  77. Quine, Maria Sophia. 1996.Population Policies in Twentieth-Century Europe: Fascist Dictatorships and Liberal Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Retherford, Robert D., Naohiro Ogawa and Satomi Sakamoto. 1996. Values and fertility change in Japan.Population Studies 50(1): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rindfuss, Ronald R. and Karin L. Brewster. 1996. Childrearing and fertility. Pp. 258–289 in J.B. Casterline, R.D. Lee and K.A. Foote (eds),Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories. Supplement toPopulation and Development Review 22.Google Scholar
  80. Rindfuss, Ronald R., Karin L. Brewster and Andrew L. Kavee. 1996. Women, work, and children: behavioral and attitudinal change in the United States.Population and Development Review 22(3): 457–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ryder, Norman B. 1997. Migration and population replacement.Canadian Studies in Population 24(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
  82. Spengler, Oswald. 1926.The Decline of the West. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  83. Teitelbaum, Michael S. and Jay M. Winter. 1985.The Fear of Population Decline. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  84. United Nations, Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. 1989.Trends in Population Policy. New York.Google Scholar
  85. United Nations, Population Division. 1995.World Population Prospects: The 1994 Revision. New York.Google Scholar
  86. United Nations, Population Division. 1997.Proceedings of the Expert Group Meeting on Below-Replacement Fertility, New York, 4–6 November 1997. ESA/P/WP. New York.Google Scholar
  87. United Nations, Population Division. 1999.World Population Prospects: The 1998 Revision, vol. 1,Comprehensive Tables. New York.Google Scholar
  88. United Nations, Population Division. 2001.World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision, vol. 1,Comprehensive Tables. New York.Google Scholar
  89. US Council of Economic Advisers. 1997.1997 Annual Report. Partly reproduced inPopulation and Development Review 23(2): 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. van de Kaa, Dirk J. 1998. Postmodern fertility preferences: from changing value orientation to new behaviour.Working Papers in Demography. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  91. van Nimwegen, Nico, Jean-Claude Chesnais and Pearl Dykstra (eds). 1993.Coping with Sustained Low Fertility in France and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  92. Wall, Richard and Jay Winter (eds). 1988.The Upheaval of War: Family, Work and Welfare in Europe, 1914–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Witte, James C. and Gert G. Wagner. 1995. Declining fertility in East Germany after unification: a demographic response to socio-economic change.Population and Development Review 21(2): 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Young, Christabel. 1990.Australia’s Ageing Population — Policy Options. Canberra: Bureau of Immigration Research.Google Scholar
  95. Young, Christabel. 1994. Beliefs and realities about the demographic role of immigration.AQ (Australian Quarterly) 66(4): 49–74.Google Scholar
  96. Zeng Yi. 1996. Is fertility in China in 1991−92 far below replacement level?Population Studies 50(1): 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Calwell
    • 1
  • Pat Caldwell
    • 1
  • Peter McDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Health Transition Centre, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population HealthThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations