Journal of Population Research

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 183–204

Trends in intercountry adoption: Analysis of data from 20 receiving countries, 1998–2004

Article

Abstract

The implications of developments in intercountry adoption worldwide in the early years of the twenty-first century are explored, based on analysis of data from 20 receiving countries. Between 1998 and 2004, intercountry adoption increased by 42 per cent. Problems in data collection and analysis are examined, as is the reliability of estimates of numbers of children sent by countries of origin when derived from data provided by receiving countries. Also considered are various measures of standardization which can be used to facilitate comparison between countries and show trends over time. The potential for more detailed comparative analysis is explored.

Keywords

Adoption numbers adoption trends children fertility international migration orphans poverty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altstein, H. and J. Simon. 1991.Intercountry Adoption; A Multinational Perspective. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, G. 1986. The adopting and adopted Swedes and their contemporary society. Pp. 23–36 in R. Hoksbergen (ed.),Adoption in Worldwide Perspective. Lisse: Swets and Zeitliger.Google Scholar
  3. Carolina Hope Adoption Agency. 2006. Are Guatemalan adoptions about to stop because of the Hague? <http://www.carolinahopeadoption.org/chguat.htm>. Accessed 20 October 2006.Google Scholar
  4. Collard, C. 2006. The international adoption of related children in Quebec (Canada). Abstract of paper presented at First International Forum on Childhood and Families: On Philias and Phobias, Barcelona, 29 September — 3 October. <http:// www.foruminternacional.ciimu. org/pdf_ngl_abstract/collard_ngl.pdf>. Accessed: 24 October 2006.Google Scholar
  5. Defence for Children International. 1991.Romania; The Adoption of Romanian Children by Foreigners. Geneva: DCI/ISS.Google Scholar
  6. Dhana, A. 2005.On Their Own: A Socio-Legal Investigation of Inter-Country Adoption in India. Hyderabad: Spark-India.Google Scholar
  7. Dickens, J. 2002. The paradox of inter-country adoption: analysing Romania’s experience as a sending country.International Journal of Social Welfare 11: 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickens, J. 2006. The social policy context of inter-country adoption. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Adoption Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, 17–21 July.Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, W. 1993. The Hague Convention on the protection of children and co-operation in respect of intercountry adoption.Adoption and Fostering 17(3): 9–13.Google Scholar
  10. Flango, V. and M. Caskey. 2005. Adoptions 2000–2001.Adoption Quarterly 8(4): 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fonseca, C. 2002. An unexpected reversal: charting the course of international adoption in Brazil.Adoption and Fostering 26(3): 28–39.Google Scholar
  12. Freidmutter, C. 2002. Testimony of Cindy Freidmutter, Executive Director, Evan B. Donaldson Institute before the House Committee on International Relations, 22 May 2002. <http:// www.adoptioninstitute.org/policy/hagueregs.html>. Accessed: 20 October 2006.Google Scholar
  13. Halifax, J. 2006. Why are there so many international adoptions in France? Paper presented at Second International Conference on Adoption Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, 17–21 July.Google Scholar
  14. Hayes, P. 2000. Deterrents to intercountry adoption in Britain.Family Relations 49: 465–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoksbergen, R. 2000. Changes in attitudes in three generations of adoptive parents: 1950–2000. Pp. 86–106 in P. Selman (ed.),Intercountry Adoption: Developments, Trends and Perspectives. London: BAAF.Google Scholar
  16. Hubinette, T. 2004. Adopted Koreans and the development of identity in the ‘third Space’.Adoption and Fostering 28(1): 16–24.Google Scholar
  17. Hubinette, T. 2006.Comforting an Orphaned Nation: Representations of International Adoption and Adopted Koreans in Korean Popular Culture. Korean Studies Series No. 32. Seoul: Jimoondang Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Kane, S. 1993. The movement of children for international adoption: an epidemiological perspective.Social Science Journal 30(4): 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenney, C. and J. Ortman. 2005. International migration, family formation, or both?: how should we measure international adoption? Poster presentation at Annual Meeting of Population Association of America, Philadelphia, 31 March — 2 April.Google Scholar
  20. Lehland, K. 2000.Crude Adoption Rates for Receiving Countries in 1998. Oslo: Adopsjonsforum.Google Scholar
  21. Lovelock, K. 2000. Intercountry adoption as a migratory practice.International Migration Review 34(3): 907–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Masson, J. 2001. The 1999 reform of intercountry adoption in the United Kingdom,Family Law Quarterly 32(2): 141–166.Google Scholar
  23. Pilotti, D. 1990.Intercountry Adoption; Trends, Issues and Policy Implications for the 1990s. Montevideo: Inter American Children’s Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Sarri, R., Y. Baik and M. Bombyk. 1998. Goal displacement and dependency in South Korean-United States intercountry adoption.Children and Youth Services Review 20: 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Selman, P. 1998. Intercountry adoption in Europe after the Hague Convention. Pp. 147–169 in R. Sykes and P. Alcock (eds),Developments in European Social Policy: Convergence and Diversity. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Selman, P. 1999. The demography of intercountry adoption. Pp. 230–246 in A. Ryvgold, M. Dalen and B. Saetersdal (eds)Mine — Yours — Ours and Theirs. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  27. Selman, P. 2000. The demographic history of intercountry adoption. Pp. 15–37 in P. Selman (ed.),Intercountry Adoption: Developments, Trends and Perspectives, London: BAAF.Google Scholar
  28. Selman, P. 2000. Intercountry adoption in the new millennium: the ‘quiet migration’ revisited.Population Research and Policy Review 21: 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Selman, P. 2004. Adoption — a cure for (too) many ills? Pp. 257–273 in F. Bowie (ed.),Cross Cultural Approaches to Adoption. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Selman, P. 2005. Trends in intercountry adoption 1998–2003: a demographic analysis. Paper presented at First Global Conference on Adoption Research, Copenhagen, 9–10 September.Google Scholar
  31. Selman, P. 2006. The movement of children for international adoption: developments and trends in receiving states and states of origin 1998–2004. Paper presented at First International Forum on Childhood and Families: On Philias and Phobias, Barcelona, 29 September — 3 October.Google Scholar
  32. Selman, P. and K. Mason. 2005. Alternatives to adoption for looked after children. Pp. 158–185 in C. Annex (ed.),Adoption: Better Choices for Our Children Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  33. Smolin, D. 2004. Intercountry adoption as child trafficking.Valparaiso Law Review 39(2): 281–325.Google Scholar
  34. Smolin, D. 2005. The two faces of intercountry adoption: the significance of the Indian scandals.Seton Hall Law Review 35: 403–443.Google Scholar
  35. The Hague Conference. 2005. Conclusions and Recommendations of the second meeting of the Special Commission on the practical operation of the Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on protection of children and co-operation in respect of intercountry adoption, 17–23 September: The Hague: HCCH.Google Scholar
  36. UNICEF. 2005.State of the Worlds Children 2005. New York.Google Scholar
  37. US State Department. 2006. False rum or that Guatemala will halt adoptions. <http://travel. state.gov/family/adoption/notices/notices_3042.html>. Accessed: 14 November 2006.Google Scholar
  38. Weil, R.H. 1984. International adoptions: the quiet migration.International Migration Review 18(2): 276–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography, Politics and SociologyNewcastle UniversityNew castle upon TyneEngland

Personalised recommendations