Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 18–24 | Cite as

A comparative study of supervised classifiers on a subscene in Junagadh district, Gujarat

  • M. P. Oza
  • S. A. Sharma
Article

Abstract

This paper describes the results of a comparative study of five classifiers viz., maximum likelihood, modified maximum likelihood, minimum distance to mean. Fisher and min-max, for classifying a subscene of Junagadh district using Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data. The kappa coefficient of agreement (k) and per cent correctly classified pixels for training data are used as measures of overall performance. It is observed that maximum likelihood and modified maximum likelihood classifiers perform better than the other three classifiers for this data set. Band combinations (3, 4, S) and (2, 3, 4, S) perform better than the usual combination (1,2,3,4), possibly because of presence of middle infrared band (band 5) on a scene dominated by vegetation cover. The band combination (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7) performed the best.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beaubien J 1979. Forest type mapping from Landsat digital data.Photogr. Engg. and Rem. Sens.,45, 1135–1144.Google Scholar
  2. Chang J K and Dwyer S J, 1973. New multiclass classification method : Modified maximum likelihood decision rule.Proceedings of the first International Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition. Washington D.C., October 30–November 1, 334–339.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen J 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement,20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig R G. 1979. Autocorrelation in Landsat data.Proceedings of the 13th Int. Symp. on Rem. Sens. Environment, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1517–1524.Google Scholar
  5. Craig R G and Labovitz M L 1980. Sources of variation in Landsat autocorrelation,Proceedings of the 14th Int. Symp. on Rem. Sens, of Environment. Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1755–1767.Google Scholar
  6. Dadhwal V K, Parihar J S, Medhavy D S, Ruhal D S and Jarwal S D 1987. Wheat acreage estimation of Haryana for 1986–87, using Landsat MSS data.Scientific Note : IRS-UP/SAC/CPF/SN/ 15/87, 26.Google Scholar
  7. Diaconis P and Efron B 1983. Computer intensive methods in statistics.Scientific American,248, 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geisser S 1981. Sample reuse procedures for prediction of the unobserved portion of a partially observed vector.Biometrika. 68, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haralick R M, Shanmugam K and Dinstein I 1973. Textural features for image classification,IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,SMC-3, 610–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hudson W D and Ramm C W 1987. Correct formulation of the kappa coefficient of agreementPhotogr. Engg. and Rem. Sens.,53, 421–422.Google Scholar
  11. Jain A K, Dubes R C and Chen C 1987. Bootstrap techniques for error estimation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,PAMI-9, 628–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenson JR 1986.Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  13. Nelson R F, Latty R S and Mott G, 1984. Classifying northern forests using Thematic Mapper Simulator data.Photogr. Engg. and Rem. Sens.,50, 607–617.Google Scholar
  14. Potdar M B, Kalubarme M H, Sharma R, Biswas B C, Dubey RC and Bhandari S G 1987. Remote sensing based hectarage estimation of semi-arid tropical crops : A case study of 1986 rabi sorghum in Solapur district.Scientific Note: IRS-UP/SAC/CPF/SN/14/87. 23p.Google Scholar
  15. Rosenfield G H and Fitzpatrick-Lins R 1986. A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy,Photo. Engg. and Rem. Sens,52, 223–227.Google Scholar
  16. Sheffield C 1985. Selecting band combinations from multispectral data.Photogr. Engg. and Rem. Sens.,51, 681–687.Google Scholar
  17. Skidmore A K and Turner B J 1988. Forest mapping accuracies are improved using a supervised nonparametric classifier with SPOT data.Photogr. Engg. and Rem. Sens.,54, 1415–1421.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. Oza
    • 1
  • S. A. Sharma
    • 1
  1. 1.Space Applications CentreAhmedabad

Personalised recommendations