Advertisement

The effect of prebending on the formability in the tube hydroforming process of an aluminum rear subframe

  • Heon Young Kim
  • Hee Taek Lim
  • Hyung Jong Kim
  • Dong Jae Lee
Article

Abstract

The effects of 2D and 3D prebending on the forming limit in the tube hydroforming process of an automotive rear subframe are evaluated and compared through finite element analyses and experimental tryouts. The influence of the strain path corresponding to each prebending method is discussed in terms of a forming limit diagram (FLD) and a forming limit stress diagram (FLSD). An incremental strain-to-stress transformation scheme to plot the FLSD from the FLD along an arbitrary strain path is proposed. A tube hydroformability testing system designed and manufactured to provide an arbitrary combination of internal pressure and axial feed is introduced. A forming limit diagram of the A6063 aluminum tube material is obtained from free bulging, T-shape forming and cross-shape forming tests using this system.

Keywords

aluminum tube hydroforming prebending forming limit finite element analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    H. J. Kim, B. H. Jeon, H. Y. Kim, and J. J. Kim,Advanced Technology of Plasticity, p. 545 (1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Shan, Y. S. Kim, Y. Lu, S. T. Kim, and C. L. Wang,Metals and Materials 6, 519 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Bobbert, M. Bischer, M. A. Ahemtoglu, and T. Altan,Report No. ERC/NSM-R-97-2, p. 3 (1997).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. I. Johnson, B. N. Nguyen, R. W. Davies, G. J. Grant, and M. A. Khaleel,Int. J. of Plasticity 20, 1111 (2004).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Asnafi, T. Nilsson, and G. Lassl,Int. J. Plasticity 142, 93 (2003).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Lang, S. Yuan, X. Wang, X. R. Wang, Z. Fu, J. Danckert, and K. B. Nielsen,J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 146, 377 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Sokolowski, K. Gerke, M. Ahmetoglu, and T. Altan,J. Mater Proc. Tech. 98, 34 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. T. Kim and Y. S. Kim,J. Mater Proc. Tech. 128, 232 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Imaninejad, G. Subhash and A. Loukus,J. Mater Proc. Tech. 147, 247 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Lejeune, N. Boudeau, and J. C. Gelin,J. Mater Proc. Tech. 143, 11 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    PAM System International S. A.,PAM-STAMP User's Guide, Version 2001 (2001).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. S. Kim and H. J. Kim,Transactions of Materials Processing 7, 575 (1998).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. F. Graf and W. F. Hosford,Metal. Trans. A 24, 2497 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. B. Stoughton,Int. J. Mech. Sci. 42, 1 (2000).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heon Young Kim
    • 1
  • Hee Taek Lim
    • 1
  • Hyung Jong Kim
    • 1
  • Dong Jae Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Mechanical Engineering and MechantronicsKangwon National UniversityGangwonKorea
  2. 2.AUSTEM Co. Ltd.IncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations