Asia Pacific Education Review

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 181–188 | Cite as

Current status of learner support in distance education: emerging issues and directions for future research



This study examines the literature on learner support with the aim of helping institutions of higher education plan and implement support services for distance learners. The following issues emerged as areas of particular importance to future research in distance learner support: 1) the lack of research on cost-effectiveness; 2) the lack of empirical research; and 3) the need for a learner-centered approach in designing and implementing learner support. These issues are discussed in detail to enhance our understanding the role of learner support in post-secondary level distance education programs. It is further argued that future research should focus more on developing and refining methods for cost-benefit analysis of learner support, developing a general framework of the learner support model in dual-mode institutions, and developing systematic methods to identify, analyze, synthesize, and assess the needs of distance learners.


learner support distance education higher education 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abate, A. K. (1999).Support services for distance education. Retrieved August 22, 2003, from community/kiosk/19991 /serve.htmGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki, K., & Pogroszewski, D. (1998). Virtual university reference model: A guide to delivering education and support services to the distance learner.Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration,1(3). Retrieved August 21, 2000, from 13.htmlGoogle Scholar
  3. Association of College & Research Libraries (2000).Guidelines for distance learning library services. Retrieved August 22, 2003, from acrl/guides/distlrng.htmlGoogle Scholar
  4. Association of College & Research Libraries (2000).Guidelines for distance learning library services. Retrieved August 22, 2003, from http://www.ala. org/acrl/guides/distlrng.htmlGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, A. W. (1994). Distance education. In T. P. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.),The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.) (p. 87). Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  6. Brent, B. O. (1999). Distance education: Implications for equity and cost-effectiveness in the allocation and use of educational resources.Journal of Education Finance, 25(Fall), 229–254.Google Scholar
  7. Broad, M. C. (1999). The dynamics of quality assurance in on-line distance education.Electronic Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 3(1), 12–21.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, R. D., Downs, E., Repman, J., & Clark, K. F. (1998, March, 1998).So you want to develop web-based instruction: Points to ponder. Paper presented at the SITE 98: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. Carnwell, R. (2000). Approaches to study and their impact on the need for support and guidance in distance education.Open Learning, 15(2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen, C. J. (1973).The contingency theory or organization: A methodological analysis: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  11. Cukier, J. (1997). Cost-benefit analysis of telelearning: Developing a methodology framework.Distance Education, 18(1) 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission (1996).The potential cost-effectiveness of tertiary open and distance learning. Luxembourg: European Association of Distance Teaching Universities.Google Scholar
  13. Feasley, C. E. (1983).Serving learners at a distance: A guide to program practices. Washington D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  14. Frieden, S. (1999). Support services for distance education.Educational Technology & Society, 2(3), 48–54.Google Scholar
  15. Garrison, D. R., & Baynton, M. (1987). Beyond independence in distance education: The concept of control.The American Journal of Distance Education, 1(3), 3–15.Google Scholar
  16. Gunawardena, C. N. (1988).New communications technologies and distance education: A paradigm for the integration of video-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
  17. Hardy, D. W., & Boaz, M. H. (1997). Learner development: Beyond the technology. In T. E. Cyrs (Ed.),Teaching and learning at a distance: What it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs (pp. 41–48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Hickman, C. J. (1999). Public policy implications associated with technology assisted distance learning.Adult Learning, 10(3), 17–20.Google Scholar
  19. Institute for Higher Education Policy (2000).Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for success in internet-based distance education: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.Google Scholar
  20. Keast. (1997). Toward an effective model for implementing distance education programs.The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(2), 39–55.Google Scholar
  21. Lyall, R., & McNamara, S. (2000). Influences of the orientations to learning of distance education students in Australia.Open Learning, 15(2), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mantyla, K., & Gividen, J. R. (2000). Distance learning failure factors: Defense Technical Information Center. In K. Mantyla (Ed.),The 2000/2001 ASTD distance learning yearbook (pp. 49–50). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999).Distance education at postsecondary education institutions: 1997–98 (Statistical Analysis Report No. NCES 2000-013). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  24. Nunan, T. (2000). Rethinking the ways in which teaching and learning are supported: The flexible learning center at the University of South Australia.Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(1), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reid, J. (1995). Managing learning support. In F. Lockwood (Ed.),Open and distance learning today (pp. 265–275). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Reinert, B. R., & Fryback, P. B. (1997). Distance learning and nursing education.Journal of Nursing Education, 36(9), 421–427.Google Scholar
  27. Robinson, B. (1995). Research and pragmatism in learner support. In F. Lockwood (Ed.),Open and distance learning today (pp. 221–231). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rumble, G. (1999). Cost analysis of distance learning.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 12(2), 122–137.Google Scholar
  29. Sache, D., & Mark, M. (2000, August).Support services for online and distance education programs. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  30. Sahoo. (1993).Higher education at a distance. New Delhi: Sanchar Publishing House.Google Scholar
  31. Scalzo, K., Matela-Rodier, D., & Ferrauilo, M. (2000, August).Customer-focused support services for distance learning. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  32. Sewart, D. (1987). Limitations of the learning package. In M. Thorpe & D. Grugeon (Eds.),Open learning for adults. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  33. Sewart, D. (1993). Student support systems in distance education.Open Learning, 8(3), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C, & Hanson, D. (1999). Theory and distance education: A new discussion.The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 60–75.Google Scholar
  35. Singh, B. (1988). Student support services. In B. N. Koul, B. Singh & M. M. Ansari (Eds.),Studies in distance education (pp. 66–72). New Delhi: Association of Indian Universities: New Delhi Indira Gandhi National Open University.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, R. (2000, August).Library? What library? Building research requirements into distance courses. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  37. Stephens, K. (1996). The role of the library in distance learning: A review of UK, North American and Australian literature.The New Review of Academic Librarianship, 2, 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tait, A. (1995). Student support in open and distance learning. In F. Lockwood (Ed.),Open and distance Learning today (pp. 232–241). London: Boutledge.Google Scholar
  39. Thompson, R., Winterfield, J., & Flanders, M. (1998). Into the world of electronic classrooms: A passport to flexible learning.British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thorpe, M. (1988).Evaluating open and distance learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  41. Wagner, E. D. (1999). Beyond distance education: Distributed learning systems. In H. Stolovitch & E. Keeps (Eds.),Handbook of human performance technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 626–648). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  42. Watkins, B. L., & Wright, S. J. (Eds.). (1991).The foundations of American distance education. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  43. Whalen, T., & Wright, D. (1999). Methodology for cost-benefit analysis of web-based tele-learning: Case study of the Bell Online Institute.The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations