Advertisement

The Mathematical Intelligencer

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 38–43 | Cite as

Yea why try her raw wet hat: A tour of the smallest projective space

  • Burkard Polster
Article

Keywords

Projective Space Projective Plane Mathematical Intelligencer Generalize Quadrangle Point Extension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beutelspacher, A. 21 - 6 = 15: a connection between two distinguished geometries,Am. Math. Monthly 93 (1986), 29–41.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cameron, P. J.,Combinatorics—Topics, Techniques, Algorithms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1994).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hall, J. I., On identifying PG(3, 2) and the complete 3-design on seven points,Ann. Discrete Math. 7 (1980), 131–141.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeurissen, R. H., Special sets of lines in PG(3, 2),Linear Alg. Appl. 226/228(1995), 617–638.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lloyd, E. K., The reaction graph of the Fano plane, inCombinatorics and Graph Theory ’95, Vol. 1, edited by Ku Tung-Hsin, Singapore: World Scientific (1995), pp. 260–274.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polster, B.,A Geometrical Picture Book, New York: Springer-Verlag (1998).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Dam, E., Classification of spreads of PG(3, 4) PG(3, 2)Des Codes Cryptogr. 3 (1993), 193–198.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pure MathematicsUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations