Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 55, Issue 6, pp 344–350 | Cite as

Thoracic epidural analgesia improves pulmonary function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

  • Paul K. Tenenbein
  • Roland Debrouwere
  • Doug Maguire
  • Peter C. Duke
  • Brian Muirhead
  • James Enns
  • Michael Meyers
  • Kevin Wolfe
  • Stephen E. KowalskiEmail author
Reports Of Original Investigations

Abstract

Purpose: Pulmonary dysfunction commonly occurs following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, increasing morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) would improve pulmonary function and would decrease complications in patients undergoing CABG surgery.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted with Ethics Board approval. Fifty patients, undergoing CABG surgery, were randomized to the epidural group or to the patient-controlled analgesia morphine group. Patients in the epidural group received a high, thoracic epidural, preoperatively. Intraoperatively, 0.75% ropivacaine was infused, followed postoperatively, by 0.2% ropivacaine for 48 hr. Outcome measurements included: visual analogue pain scores; spirometry; atelectasis scores on chest radiographs; and the incidence of atrial fibrillation.

Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled in each group. Patients in the epidural group had significantly less pain on the operative day, and for the subsequent two days. Compared to baseline, the forced expiratory volume in one second was significantly higher in the epidural group, on the first and second postoperative days (43.7±12.2%vs 36.4±12.0%,p<0.002, and 43.3±12.5%vs 38.4±11.0%,p<0.05). There was significantly more atelectasis in the control group, four hours postoperatively (p<0.04); however, on the third, postoperative day, the groups were similar with regards to this outcome. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was similar in both groups, and there were no complications related to the epidural.

Conclusions: High TEA decreases postoperative pain and atelectasis and improves pulmonary function in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Our results support the use of TEA in this group of patients.

Keywords

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Ropivacaine Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Epidural Catheter Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

L’analgésie péridurale thoracique améliore la fonction pulmonaire chez les patients subissant une chirurgie cardiaque

Résumé

Objectif: Des troubles pulmonaires surviennent fréquemment à la suite d’une chirurgie de pontage aortocoronarien (pAC), ce qui augmente la morbidité et la mortalité. Nous avons émis l’hypothèse que l’anesthésie péridurale thoracique (ApT) améliorerait la fonction pulmonaire et réduirait les complications chez les patients subissant une chirurgie de pAC.

Méthode: Après avoir obtenu l’accord du Comité d’éthique, nous avons mené cette étude prospective, randomisée et contrôlée. Cinquante patients subissant une chirurgie pAC ont été randomisés dans deux groupes, péridurale ou analgésie contrôlée par le patient avec de la morphine. Les patients du groupe péridurale ont reçu une péridurale thoracique haute avant l’opération. pendant l’opération, ils ont reçu une perfusion de ropivacaïne 0,75 %, puis de la ropivacaïne 0,2 % pendant 48 h après l’opération. Les résultats mesurés étaient les scores de douleur sur l’échelle visuelle analogue, la spirométrie, les scores d’atélectasie sur les radiographies pulmonaires et l’incidence de fibrillation auriculaire.

Résultats: Chaque groupe comprenait 25 patients. La douleur chez les patients du groupe péridurale était considérablement moins élevée le jour de l’opération et les deux jours suivants. par rapport aux données de base, le volume expiratoire maximal en une seconde était significativement plus élevé dans le groupe péridurale le premier et le deuxième jour postopératoire (43,7±12,2 % vs 36,4±12,0 %, p<0,002, et 43,3±12,5 % vs 38,4±11,0 %, p<0,05). L’atélectasie a été significativement plus élevée dans le groupe témoin quatre heures après l’opération (p<0,04) ; toutefois, le troisième jour postopératoire, les groupes ont montré des résultats d’atélectasie similaires. L’incidence de fibrillation auriculaire était semblable dans les deux groupes, et il n’y a pas eu de complication associée à la péridurale.

Conclusion: L’analgésie péridurale thoracique haute réduit la douleur postopératoire et l’atélectasie et améliore la fonction pulmonaire chez les patients subissant un pAC. Nos résultats appuient l’utilisation de l’ApT chez ce groupe de patients.

References

  1. 1.
    Gravlee GP. Epidural analgesia and coronary artery bypass grafting: the controversy continues. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17: 151–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaney MA. Intrathecal and epidural anesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1211–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scott NB, Turfrey DJ, Ray DA, et al. A prospective randomized study of the potential benefits of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 528–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sternest R, Bjella L, Berg EM, Christensen O, Levang OW, Gisvold SE. Effects of thoracic epidural analgesia on pulmonary function after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10: 859–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Priestley M, Cope, L, Halliwell R, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: the effects on tracheal intubation time and length of hospital stay. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 275–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fawcett WJ, Edwards RE, Quinn IA, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia started after cardiopulmonary bypass. Adrenergic, cardiovascular and respiratory sequelae. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 294–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tenling A, Joachimsson PO, Tyden H, Hedenstierna G. Thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia for cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 1071–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jideus L, Joachimsson PO, Stridsberg M, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia does not influence the occurrence of postoperative sustained atrial fibrillation. Am Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilcox P, Baile EM, Hards J, et al. Phrenic nerve function and its relationship to atelectasis after coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 1988; 93: 693–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ballantyne JC, Carr, DB, deFerranti S, et al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 598–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nicholson DJ, Kowalski SE, Hamilton GA, Meyers MP, Serrette CA, Duke PC. Postoperative pulmonary function in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients undergoing early tracheal extubation: a comparison between short-term mechanical ventilation and early extubation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 27–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu SS, Block BM, Wu CL. Effects of periorperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. A meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2004, 101: 153–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weissman C. Pulmonary function after cardiac and thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1272–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liem TH, Hasenbos MA, Booij LH, Gielen MJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting using two different anesthetic techniques: Part 2: postoperative outcome. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1992; 6: 156–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moon MC, Abdoh A, Hamilton GA, et al. Safety and efficacy of fast track in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 2001; 16: 319–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor LC, et al. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA 2004; 291: 1720–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ho AM, Chung DC, Joynt GM. Neuroaxial blockade and hematoma in cardiac surgery: estimating the risk of a rare adverse event that has not (yet) occurred. Chest 2000; 117: 551–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pastor MC, Sanchez MJ, Casas MA, Mateu J, Bataller ML. Thoracic epidural analgesia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: seven years’ experience. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17: 154–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Benzon H, et al. Regional anesthesia in the anti-coagulated patient: defining the risks (The Second ASRA Consensus Conference on Neuraxial Anesthesia and Anticoagulation). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28: 172–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosen DA, Hawkinberry DW II,Rosen KR, Gustafson RA, Hogg JP, Broadman LM. An epidural hematoma in an adolescent patient after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 966–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vandermeulen EP, Van Aken H, Vermylen J. Anticoagulants and spinal-epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 1165–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul K. Tenenbein
    • 3
  • Roland Debrouwere
    • 3
  • Doug Maguire
    • 3
  • Peter C. Duke
    • 3
  • Brian Muirhead
    • 3
  • James Enns
    • 3
  • Michael Meyers
    • 1
  • Kevin Wolfe
    • 2
  • Stephen E. Kowalski
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.From the Department of Radiology, Health Sciences CentreUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.From the Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences CentreUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  3. 3.Department of AnesthesiaUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations