Comparison of marine insolation estimating methods in the adriatic sea
We compare insolation results calculated from two well-known empirical formulas (Seckel and Beaudry’s SB73 formula and the original Smithsonian (SMS) formula) and a radiative transfer model using input data predicted from meteorological weather-forecast models, and review the accuracy of each method. Comparison of annual mean daily irradiance values for clear-sky conditions between the two formulas shows that, relative to the SMS, the SB73 underestimates spring values by 9 W m-2 in the northern Adriatic Sea, although overall there is a good agreement between the annual results calculated with the two formulas. We also elucidate the effect on SMS of changing the ‘Sun-Earth distance factor (f)’, a parameter which is commonly assumed to be constant in the oceanographic context. Results show that the mean daily solar radiation for clear-sky conditions in the northern Adriatic Sea can be reduced as much as 12 W m-2 during summer due to a decrease in thef value. Lastly, surface irradiance values calculated from a simple radiative transfer model (GM02) for clear-sky conditions are compared to those from SB73 and SMS. Comparison within situ data in the northern Adriatic Sea shows that the GM02 estimate gives more realistic surface irradiance values than SMS, particularly during summer. Additionally, irradiance values calculated by GM02 using the buoy meteorological fields and ECMWF (The European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts) meteorological data show the suitability of the ECMWF data usage. Through tests of GM02 sensitivity to key regional meteorological factors, we explore the main factors contributing significantly to a reduction in summertime solar irradiance in the Adriatic Sea.
Key wordsradiative transfer model heat-flux irradiance Adriatic Sea
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bretagnon,P. and G Francou. 1988. Planetary theories in rectangular and spherical variables - VSOP87 solutions, Astron.Astroph.,202, 309–315.Google Scholar
- Fouquart, Y., B. Bonnel, G Brogniez, J.C. Buriez, L. Smith, J.J. Morcrette, and A. Cerf 1987. Observations of Saharan Aerosols: Results of ECLATS Field Experiment. Part II: Broadband Radiative Characteristics of the Aerosols and Vertical Radiative Flux Divergence.J. Appl. Meteorol.,26, 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gregg, W.W. and K.L. Carder. 1990. A simple spectral solar irradiance model for cloudless maritime atmospheres.Limnol. Oceanogr.,35, 1657–1675. Gregg, W.W. 2002. A coupled ocean-atmosphere radiative model for global ocean biogeochemical models. Technical report series on global modeling and data assimilation 22, ed. by M.Google Scholar
- Suarez, NASA/TM---2002-10460, 19 p. Gueymard, C. 1994. Analysis of monthly average atmospheric precipitable water and turbidity in Canada and Northern United States.Solar Energy,53, 57–71.Google Scholar
- List, R.J. 1958. Smithsonian Meteorological Tables. Smithsonian Inst., Washington, D.C. 527 p.Google Scholar
- Okulov, O., H. Ohvril, and R. Kivi. 2002. Atmospheric precipitable water in Estonia, 1990–2001.Bor. Env. Res.,7, 291–300.Google Scholar
- Paltridge, G. W. and C. M. R. Platt. 1976. Radiative Processes in Meteorology and Climatology. Elsevier Sci. 318 p.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T.R., M. Takahashi, and B. Hargrave. 1984. Biological oceanographic processes. Pergamon, Oxford. 330 p.Google Scholar
- Seckel, GR. and F.H. Beaudry. 1973. The radiation from sun and sky over the North Pacific Ocean (abstract).EOS Trans, AGV.,54,1114.Google Scholar
- Spencer, J.W. 1971.Fourier series representation of the position of the Sun.Search 2(5), 172.Google Scholar
- Tetens, O. 1930. Über einige meteorologische Begriffe.Z. Geophys.,6, 297–309.Google Scholar
- Wen, G, R.F. Cahalan, and B.N. Holben. 2003. Limitations of ground-based solar irradiance estimates due to atmospheric variations.J. Geophys. Res.,108, D14, 4400, doi:10.1029/ 2003JD003431.Google Scholar