Ocean Science Journal

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 211–219 | Cite as

Spatial heterogeneity and long-term changes in bivalveAnadara broughtoni population: influence of river run-off and fishery

  • Alla V. SilinaEmail author


A comparison was made of population of the economically important cockleAnadara (=Scapharca)broughtoni (Bivalvia, Arcidae) inhabiting different areas of the Razdolnaya River estuary at the head of Amurskii Bay (Peter the Great Gulf, East Sea). Also, changes in cockle population density and structure, as well as in cockle growth rates during the last 20 years were studied. In all years of investigation, the morphometrical parameters and growth rates of cockles were smaller at the sites located close to the River mouth than farther down-estuary. The differences can be attributed to higher concentration of suspended particulate matter, decreased salinity and water temperature, as well as a longer exposure to these unfavorable environmental factors at sites located close to the River mouth, compared to farther sites. For two decades, cockle population density had decreased by almost 30 times at some sites in the River estuary. The main reason for this population decline is commercial over-fishing of the cockle. Besides, for the last 20 years, linear parameters of the cockles in the population decreased approximately by 30% and weight parameters, almost two times. Cockle growth rates also decreased for this period. Evidently, these facts are due to the damaging effect of dredging.

Key words

benthos trawling mollusk estuary spatial distribution age growth 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Afeichuk, L.S. 2005. Features of bivalveAnadara fishery in the Ussuriyskii Bay. p. 179–182. In:Marine coastal ecosystems: Seaweeds and invertebrates. Proceedings of the 2th International Scientific and Practical Conference, ed. by B.N. Kotenev. VNIRO Publishing, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  2. Archambault, M.-C., V.M. Bricely, J. Grant, and D.M. Anderson. 2004. Effects of suspended and sediment clays on juvenile hard clams,Mercenaria mercenaria, within the context of harmful algal bloom mitigation.Mar. Biol.,144, 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benavides, A.M.S. and R.B. Carrion. 2001. Abundance and morphometry ofAnadara-tuberculosa andAnadara-similis (Mollusca: bivalvia) in the Purruja Mangrove Swamp, Golfo Dulce, Costa Rica.Revista de Biologia Tropical,49, 315–320.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, V. Ya., L.M. Yaroslavtseva, and P. V. Yaroslavtsev. 1982. Tolerance to desalination and efficiency of isolation reaction of some mollusks from the Sea of Japan.Russian J. Mar. Biol.,2, 24–28.Google Scholar
  5. Bergman, M.J.N. and J.W. van Santbrink. 2000. Mortality in megafaunal benthic populations caused by trawl fisheries on the Dutch continental shelf in the North Sea in 1994.ICES J. Mar. Sci.,57, 1321–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broom, M.J. 1985. The biology and culture of marine bivalve molluscs of the genusAnadara.ICLARM Stud. Rev.,12, 1–37.Google Scholar
  7. Dulepov, V.I., N.N. Lelyukh, and O.A. Leskova. 2002. Analysis and modeling of processes of ecosystems in Peter the Great Bay. Dalnauka, Vladivostok. 248 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Dziuba, S.M. and L.A. Maslennikova. 1982. Reproductive cycle of the bivalveAnadara broughtoni from the southern part of Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan.Russian J. Mar. Biol.,3, 34–40.Google Scholar
  9. Facca, C., A. Sfriso, and G. Socal. 2002. Changes in abundance and composition of phytoplankton and microphytobenthos due to increased sediment fluxes in the Venice lagoon, Italy.Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.,54, 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gabaev, D.D. and A.B. Olifirenko. 2001. Growth, stock, and production of theAnadara Scapharca broughtoni in Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan.Oceanology,41, 403–412.Google Scholar
  11. Gramm-Osipov, L.M. 2005. Condition of marine ecosystems influenced by the river flow. Dalnauka, Vladivostok. 261 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Grant, J., C.T. Enright, and A. Griswold. 1990. Resuspension and growth ofOstrea edulis: A field experiment.Mar. Biol.,104, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Habe, T. 1983. Edible molluscs in Japan. p. 415–453. In:Proc. 2 nd North Pacific Aquaculture Symp., Japan.Google Scholar
  14. Jennings, S., T.A. Dinmore, D.E. Duplisea, K.J. Warr, and J.E. Lancaster. 2001. Trawling disturbance can modify benthic production processes.J. Animal Ecol.,70, 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanno, H. 1966. Bottom environments of the ark shell,Scapharca broughtoni (Schrenck), in Sendai Bay.Rep. North East Aquat. Centre,26, 55–75.Google Scholar
  16. Le Floch, S., J. Guyomarch, F. Merlin, J.F. Borseth, P. Le Corre, and K. Lee. 2003. Effects of oil and bioremediation on mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) growth in mudflats.Environ. Technol.,24, 1211–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Likht, F.R., A.S. Astakhov, A.I. Botsul, A.N. Derkachev, O.V. Dudarev, Yu.D. Markov, and I.V. Utkin. 1983. Structure of bottom sediments and facies of the Sea of Japan. DVNTS AN SSSR, Vladivostok. 286 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  18. Olifirenko, A.B. 1998. Some features of the ecology of the bivalveAnadara broughtoni (Schrenk). p. 104–105. In:Regional conference on actual problems of ecology, marine biology and biotechnology. Abstracts of Reports. DVGU, Vladivostok. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  19. Patin, S.A. 2000. C. Suspended solids as natural and anthropogenic factor influencing on marine environments and organisms. p. 177–180. In:Protection of water bioresources during intensive oil-gas development in the shelf zone and inland water of the Russian Federation. Collected materials of the International seminar. State Committee for Fisheries of the Russian Federation, ed. by V. G. Dubinina. Economics and Informatics, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  20. Peharda, M., J. Bolotin, N. Vrgoc, N. Jasprica, A. Bratos, and B. Skaramuca. 2003. A study of the Noah’s ark shell (Arca noae Linnaeus 1758) in Mali Ston Bay, Adriatic Sea.J. Shellfish Res.,22, 705–709.Google Scholar
  21. Piersma, T., A. Koolhaas, A. Dekinga, J.J. Beukema, R. Dekker, and K. Essink. 2001. Long-term indirect effects of machannical cockle-dredging on intertidal bivalve stocks in the Wadden Sea.J. Appl. Ecol.,38, 976–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robinson, W.E., W.E. Wehling, and M.P. Morse. 1984. The effects of suspended clay on feeding and digestive efficiency of the surf clam,Spisula solidissima.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.,74, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scarlato, O.A. 1981. Bivalves of temperate zone of the Western Pacific Ocean. Nauka, Leningrad. 480 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  24. Shimoyama, S. 1984. Size-frequency distributions of living population and dead shell assemblages ofMacoma (Macoma) incongrua (Martens) on an intertidal mud-flat in North Kyushu.Mem. Fac. Sci., Kyushu Univ., Ser. D: Geol.,25(2), 271–287.Google Scholar
  25. Talman, S.G., A. Norkko, S.F. Thrush, and J.E. Hewitt. 2004. Habitat structure and the survival of juvenile scallopsPecten novaezelandiae: comparing predation in habitats with varying complexity.Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.,268, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thrush, S.F., J.E. Hewitt, G.A. Funnell, V.J. Cumnings, J. Ellis, D. Schultz, D. Talley, and A. Norrko. 2001. Fishing disturbance and marine biodiversity: role of habitat structure in simple soft-sediment systems.Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.,221, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tkalin, A.V., T.A. Belan, and E.N. Shapovalov. 1993. The state of the marine environment near Vladivostok, Russia.Mar. Pollut. Bull.,26(8), 418–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trimmer, M., J. Petersen, D.B. Sivyer, C. Mills, E. Young, and E.R. Parker. 2005. Impact of long-term benthic trawl disturbance on sediment sorting and biogeochemistry in the southern North Sea.Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.,298, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yaroslavtseva, L.M. and P.V. Yaroslavtsev. 1982. Osmotic tolerance of cells as a property of euryhalinity of commercial mollusks. p. 159–160. In:Biology and fishery of invertebrates from seas and oceans. Abstracts of Reports. AtlantNIRO. Kaliningrad, Russia. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  30. Zolotarev, V.N. 1989. Sclerochronology of marine bivalves. Naukova dumka, Kiev. 112 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute(KORDI) and the Korean Society of Oceanography(KSO) 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Marine Biology, Far East BranchRussian Academy of ScienceVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations