Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

, Volume 55, Issue 8, pp 495–500 | Cite as

Consent in the crossfire


Le consentement au cœur du débat


  1. 1.
    Myles PS, Tan N. Reporting of ethical approval and informed consent in clinical research published in leading anesthesia journals. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 1209–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gershon AS, Tu JV. The effect of privacy legislation on observational research. CMAJ 2008; 178: 871–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Metcalfe C, Martin RM, Noble S, et al. Low risk research using routinely collected identifiable health information without informed consent: encounters with the Patient Information Advisory Group. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 37–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helgesson G, Eriksson S. Against the principle that the individual shall have priority over science. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 54–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2725–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller FG, Emanuel EJ. Perspective. Qualityimprovement research and informed consent. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 765–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baily MA. Harming through protection? N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 768–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kihlbom U. Autonomy and negatively informed consent. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 146–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiaUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations