Advertisement

Human Evolution

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 271–282 | Cite as

Human breasts: Unsupported hypotheses reviewed

  • T. M. Caro
Article

Abstract

Unlike other apes, human females’ breasts develop before first pregnancy and are permanently enlarged. Evidence suggests breasts act as signals to males but the critical data required to confirm this are lacking. These facts have led to a number of hypotheses about the evolutionary and adaptive significance of the human breast which fall into two groups. Those that address the presence of breasts in humans are (a) that they act as releasers of male sexual behaviour, (b) that they enable females to hide their reproductive condition, and (c) that they allow infants to nurse from their mother’s hip. Those that address variability in breast size are (d) that large breasts indicate lactational potential, (e) ability of mothers to invest prenatally in offspring, (f) mother’s fecundity, and (g) her longevity. Each hypothesis is reviewed and evaluated using logical or empirical arguments. Possible ways in which the adaptive significance of human breasts can be determined in contemporary populations are outlined.

Key words

Human Breast Selection adaptive significance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander R. D. &Noonan K. M., 1979.Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In (N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons, Eds). Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, pp. 436–453. North Scituate, Mass.; Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann J., 1980.Baboon Mothers and Infants. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Borgerhoff Mulder M., 1987.Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In (L. L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder & P. W. Turke, Eds). Human Reproductive Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Broude G. E. &Grene S. J., 1976.Crosscultural codes on twenty sexual attitudes and practices. Ethnology 15: 410–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campaigne B. N., Katch V. L., Freedson P. &Sady S., 1979.Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Annals of Human Biology 6: 363–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell B. G., 1974.Human Evolution, 2nd edition. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  7. Cant J. G. H., 1981.Hypothesis for the evolution of human breasts and buttocks. American Naturalist, 117: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caro T. M. & Borgerhoff Mulder M. (in press).The problem of adaptation in the study of human behaviour. Ethology and Sociobiology.Google Scholar
  9. Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D. &Guiness F. E., 1987.Reproductive success in male and female re deer. In (T. H. Clutton-Brock, Ed). Reproductive Success. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cook M. &McHenry R., 1978.Sexual Attraction. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cowie A. T., 1984.Lactation. In (C. R. Austin & R. V. Short, Eds). Hormonal Control of Reproduction, 2nd edition pp. 195–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Crook J. H., 1972.Sexual selection, dimorphism and social organisation in the primates. In (B. Campbell, Ed.). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971 pp. 231–281. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  13. Crook J. H. &Gartlan J. S., 1966.Evolution of primate societies. Nature, 210: 1200–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies N. B., 1982.Behaviour and competition for scarce resources. In (Kings College Sociobiology Group, Ed.). Current Problems in Sociobiology, pp. 363–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Devi M. R., Kumari J. R. &Srikumari C. R., 1985.Fertility and mortality differences in relation to maternal body size. Annals of Human Biology, 12: 479–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eibil-Eibesfeldt I., 1970.Ethology: the Biology of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  17. Fisher R. A., 1958.The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  18. Ford C. S. &Breach F. A., 1952.Patterns of Sexual Behaviour. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  19. Frisch R. E., 1975.Demographic implications of the biological determinants of female fecundity. Social Biology, 22: 17–22.Google Scholar
  20. Frisch R. E., 1978a.Menarche and fatness: reexamination of the critical body composition hypothesis. Science, 200: 1509–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frisch R. E., 1978b.Population, food intake, and fertility. Science, 199: 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frisch R. E., 1983.Reply to Anderson. Current Anthropology, 24: 32.Google Scholar
  23. Frisch R. E. &McArthur J. W., 1974.Menstrual cycles: fatness as a determinant of minimum weight necessary for their maintenance or onset. Science, 185: 949–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gallup G. G. Jr., 1982.Permanent breast enlargement in human females: a sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 11: 597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallup G. G. Jr., 1986.Unique features of human sexuality in the context of evolution. In (D. Byrne & K. Kelley, Eds). Alternative Approaches to the Study of Sexual Behavior, pp. 13–42. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlabum.Google Scholar
  26. Goodhart C. B., 1964.A biological view of toplessness. New Scientist, 23: (407), 558–560.Google Scholar
  27. Gould S. J. &Vrba E. S., 1982.Exaption — a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8: 3–15.Google Scholar
  28. Graham C. A. &Mc. Grew W. C., 1980.Menstrual synchrony in female undergraduates living on a coeducational campus. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 5: 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gunther M., 1955.Instinct and the nursing couple. Lancet 1955: 575–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamilton C. E. &Rankin J., 1975.Changes in volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle. British Journal of Surgery, 62: 660–669.Google Scholar
  31. Harcourt A. H., Harvey P. H., Larson S. G. &Short R. V., 1981.Testis weight, body and breeding system in primates. Nature, 293: 55–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartmann P. E., Rattigan S., Prosser C. G., Saint L. &Arthur P. G., 1984.Human lactation: back to nature. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 51: 337–368.Google Scholar
  33. Hinde R. A., 1975.The concept of function. In (G. Baerends, C. Beer & A. Manning, Eds). Function and Evolution in Behaviour, pp. 3–15. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  34. Hollander X., 1985. Penthouse Magazine, 20: (3), 131.Google Scholar
  35. Hytten F. E., 1954.Clinical and chemical studies in human lactation VI. The functional capacity of the breast. British Medical Journal, 1: 912–915.Google Scholar
  36. Hytten F. E. &Thomson A. M., 1965.Pregnancy, childbirth and lactation. In (O. G. Edholm & A. L. Bacharach, Eds). The Physiology of Human Survival, pp. 327–350. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kano T., 1980.Social behavior of wild pigmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba: a preliminary report. Journal of Human Evolution, 9: 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Katch V. L., Campaigne B, Freedson P., Sady S., Katch F. I. &Behnke A. R., 1980.Contribution of breast volume and weight to body fat distribution in females. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 53: 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kleine C. L. &Staneski R. A., 1980.First impressions of female bust size. Journal of Social Psychology, 110: 123–134.Google Scholar
  40. Konner M. &Worthman C., 1980.Nursing frequency, gonadal function, and birth spacing among! Kung hunter-gatherers. Sicence, 207: 788–791.Google Scholar
  41. Kuttner R. E., 1975.On infant convenience and female breast form.American Naturalist, 109: 596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lamb M. E., Pleck J. H., Charnov E. L. &Levine J. A. 1985.Paternal behavior in humans. American Zoologist, 25: 883–894.Google Scholar
  43. Le Blanc S. A. &Barnes E., 1974.On the adaptive significance of the human breast. American Naturalist, 108: 577–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lohman T. G., 1981.Skinfolds and body density and their relation to fatness: a review. Human Biology, 53: 181–225.Google Scholar
  45. Lovejoi C. O., 1981.The origin of man. Science, 211: 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Malina R. M., 1983.Menarche in atheletes: a synthesis and hypothesis. Annals of Human Biology, 10: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marshall W. A., 1970.Sex differences at puberty. Journal of Biosocial Science suppl., 2: 31–41.Google Scholar
  48. Mason W. A., 1965.The social development of monkeys and apes. In (I. DeVore, Ed). Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes. pp. 514–543. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  49. Masters W. H. &Johnson V. E., 1966.Human Sexual Response. Londo: J. & E. Churchill.Google Scholar
  50. Maynard Smith J., 1977.Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Animal Behaviour, 25: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morgan E. 1972.The Descent of Woman, New York: Stein & Day.Google Scholar
  52. Morris D. 1967.The Naked Ape. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  53. Munn C. A., 1986.Birds that ‘cry wolf’. Nature, 319: 143–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nassar A. M. &Smith R. E., 1975.Menstrual variations in thermal properties of the human breast. Journal of Applied Physiology, 39: 806–811.Google Scholar
  55. Peaker M., Vernon R. G. &Knight C. H., 1984.Physiological Strategies in Lactation. Zoological Society of London. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Pond C. M., 1984.Physiological and ecological importance of energy storage in the evolution of lactation: evidence for a common pattern of anatomical organisation of adipose tissue in mammals. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 51: 1–32.Google Scholar
  57. Prentice A. M., Paul A. A., Prentice A., Black A. E., Cole T. J. &Withehead R. G., 1986.Crosscultural differences in lactational performance. In (M. Hamosh & A. S. Goldman, Eds) Human Lactation — Maternal and Environmental factors. pp. 13–44. New York: Plenum Pubbl. Corp. October 1985.Google Scholar
  58. «S. J. L.», 1986.Guardian Newspaper, January 15th, p. 22.Google Scholar
  59. Salazar H. &Tobon H., 1974.Morphological changes in the mammary gland during development, pregnancy, and lactation. In (J. B. Josimovich, M. Reynolds & E. Cobo, Eds). Lactogenic Hormones, Fetal Nutrition and Lactation p. 221. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Davard R., Bouchard C., LeBlanc C. &Tremblay A., 1983.Familial resemblance in fatness indicators. Annals of Human Biology, 10: 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schell L. M. &Hodges D. C., 1985.Variation in size at birth and cigarette smoking during pregnancy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 68: 549–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schmidt G. &Sigusch V., 1970.Sex differences in responses to psychosexual stimulation by films and slides. Journal of Sex Research, 6: 268–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schort R. V., 1976.The evolution of human reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B., 195: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Short R. V., 1979.Sexual selection and its component parts, somatic and genital selection, as illustrated by man and the great apes. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 9: 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Short R. V. &Drife J. O., 1977.The aetiology of mammary cancer in man and animals. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 41: 211–230.Google Scholar
  66. Simpson M. J. A., 1978.Tactile experience and sexual behaviour: aspects of development with special reference to primates. In (J. B. Hutchison, Ed). Biological Determinants of Sexual Behaviour. pp. 785–807. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  67. Smith R. L., 1984.Human sperm competition. In (R. L. Smith, Ed). Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. pp. 601–659. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  68. Symons D., 1979.The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Tinbergen N.On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 20: 410–463.Google Scholar
  70. Trivers R. L., 1972.Parental investment and sexual selection. In (B. Campbell, Ed). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971. pp. 136–179. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  71. Trivers R., 1985.Social Evolution. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
  72. Trussel J., 1978.Menarche and fatness: reexamination of the critical body composition hypothesis. Science, 200: 1506–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Turke P. W., 1984.Effects of ovulatory concealment and synchrony on protohominid mating systems and parental roles. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5: 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weiss E., 1975.The Female Breast. New York: Bantam books.Google Scholar
  75. Wickler W., 1972.The Sexual Code. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  76. Wiggins J. S., Wiggins N. &Conger J. C., 1968.Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10: 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams G. C., 1966.Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Witten D. M., 1971.The Breast: An Atlas of Tumor Radiology. Yearbook Medical Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  79. Wood J. W., Lai D., Johnson P. L., Campbell K. L. &Maslar I. A., 1985.Lactation and birth spacing in hihgland New Guinea. Journal of Biosocial Sciences suppl., 9: 159–173.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. M. Caro
    • 1
  1. 1.Sub-Department of Animal BehaviourUniversity of Cambridge MadingleyCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations