Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

, Volume 45, Issue 10, pp 943–948

Preoperative education and outcome of patient controlled analgesia

  • Michael J. Griffin
  • Louise Brennan
  • Alan J. McShane
Reports of Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the effect of intensive preoperative education on the outcome of Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) postoperatively.

Methods

This prospective randomised study was carried out in a single teaching hospital over three months. One group of patients (n = 42) received a 20 min standardised tutorial regarding PCA use from a single investigator and the other group (n = 43) received no additional education apart from the routine preoperative anaesthetic consultation. A blinded investigator assessed the patients following surgery. Pain scores and morphine consumption, patient satisfaction, side-effect profile and anti-emetic use were recorded at six, 24 and 48 hr post-operatively.

Results

Pain scores, satisfaction scores and morphine consumption were similar in both groups throughout the study period. Fewer patients in the tutored group complained of nausea from 6 to 24 hr than did untutored patients (28%vs 51 %;P < 0.05). More tutored patients used antiemetic medication from 0 to 6 (28%vs 12%;P < 0.05) and 6 to 24 hr (37%vs 19%;P < 0.05). Side effect profile and requirement for rescue analgesia was otherwise similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that specific preoperative education of patients using PCA does not alter pain scores, morphine consumption or patient satisfaction but may result in earlier and more effective use of anti-emetic medication.

Résumé

Objectif

Déterminer l’effet d’un enseignement préopératoire intensif sur l’évolution postopératoire de l’analgésie contrôlée par le patient (ACP).

Méthode

On a réalisé une étude prospective et randomisée dans un seul hôpital d’enseignement pendant trois mois. Un groupe de patients (n = 42) a reçu d’un unique expérimentateur un cours individuel standardisé concernant l’utilisation de l’ACP et l’autre groupe (n = 43) n’a reçu aucun enseignement additionnel après la visite de routine de l’anesthésiste avant l’intervention. Un expérimentateur impartial a évalué les patients après la chirurgie. Les scores de douleur et la consommation de morphine, la satisfaction du patient, le profil des effets secondaires et l’utilisation d’antiémétique ont été enregistrés six, 24 et 48 h après l’opération.

Résultat

Les scores de douleur et de satisfaction et la consommation de morphine étaient similaires dans les deux groupes tout au long de l’expérience. Il y a eu moins de plaintes de nausée entre 6 et 24 h chez les patients qui ont reçu un enseignement que chez ceux qui n’en ont pas eu (28 %vs 51 %;P < 0,05). Un plus grand nombre de patients informés a utilisé des médicaments antiémétiques de 0 à 6 (28 %vs 12 %;P < 0,05) et de 6 à 24 h (37 %vs 19 %;P < 0,05). Le profil des effets secondaires et la demande d’analgésie supplémentaire ont été, par ailleurs, similaires dans les deux groupes.

Conclusion

Nos résultats laissent croire qu’un enseignement préopératoire spécifique dispensé aux patients qui utilisent l’ACP n’a pas d’effet sur les scores de douleur, la consommation de morphine ou la satisfaction du patient, mais qu’il peut entraîner un usage précoce et plus efficace de médicaments antiémétiques.

References

  1. 1.
    Notcutt WG, Morgan RJM. Introducing patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain control into a district general hospital. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 401–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy DF, Grazioti G, Chalkiadis G, McKenna M. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Pain, Seattle: Internatational Association Study of Pain 1993; 393.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hall GM, Salmon P. Patient-controlled analgesia — who benefits? (Editorial) Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 401–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahler HIM, Kulik JA. Preferences for health care involvement, perceived control and surgical recovery: a prospective study. Soc Sci Med 1990; 31: 743–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas V, Heath M, Rose D, Flory P. Psychological characteristics and the effectiveness of patient — controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74: 271–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brydon CW, Asbury AJ. Attitudes to pain and pain relief in adult surgical patients. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 279–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott NB, Hodson M. Public perceptions of postoperative pain and its relief. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 438–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thomas VJ, Rose FD. Patient-controlled analgesia: a new method for old. J Adv Nursing 1993; 18: 1719–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas VJ, Heath ML, Rose FD. Effect of psychological variables and pain relief system on postoperative pain experience. (Abstract) Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 388–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson LR, Magnani B, Chan V, Ferrante FM. Modifiers of patient-controlled analgesia efficacy. 1. Locus of control. Pain 1989; 39: 17–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garden AL, Merry AF, Holland RL, Petrie KJ. Anaesthesia information — what patients want to know. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996; 24: 594–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kluger MT, Owen H. Patients’ expectations of patientcontrolled analgesia. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 1072–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klafta JM, Roizen MF. Current understanding of patients’ attitudes toward and preparation for anaesthesia: a review. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1314–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Egbert LD, Battit GE, Welch CE, Bartlett MK. Reduction of postoperative pain by encouragement and instruction of patients. N Eng J Med 1964; 270: 825–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson EA. Preoperative preparation for cardiac surgery facilitates recovery, reduces psychological distress, and reduces the incidence of acute postoperative hypertension. J Consult Clin Psychol 1987; 55: 513–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilder-Smith CH, Schuler L. Postoperative analgesia: pain by choice? The influence of patient attitudes and patient education. Pain 1992; 50: 249–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elsass P, Eikard B, Junge J, Lykke J, Staun P, Feldt-Rasmussen M. Psychological effect of detailed preanesthetic information. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987; 31: 579–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams OA. Patient knowledge of operative care. J R Soc Med 1993; 86: 328–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keeri-Szanto M, Heaman S. Postoperative demand analgesia. Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1972; 134: 645–51.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor NM, Hall GM, Salmon P. Patients’ experiences of patient-controlled analgesia. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 525–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor N, Hall GM, Salmon P. Is patient-controlled analgesia controlled by the patient? Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1137–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Owen H, McMillan V, Rogowski D. Postoperative pain therapy: a survey of patients’ expectations and their experiences. Pain 1990; 41: 303–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Griffin
    • 1
  • Louise Brennan
    • 1
  • Alan J. McShane
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive CareSt. Vincent’s HospitalDublinIreland
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations