Advertisement

Douleur et Analgésie

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 19–25 | Cite as

L’effet placebo dans le traitement de la douleur

  • J. Bruxelle
  • C. Marquez
  • D. Valade
Article

Résumé

Les auteurs analysent plusieurs études cliniques concernant les effets analgésiques du placebo dans le traitement de la douleur. Mimant les effets antalgiques de la thérapeutique verum prescrite, le placebo induit une analgésie importante en moyenne chez 35% des patients avec des variations selon la pathologie étudiée et les modalités du traitement utilisé. L’effect placebo est surtout influencé par les attentes et les convictions du patient, du médecin et de l’entourage et par la qualité de la relation médecin-malade. Correspondant à une véritable analgésie psychogène, il pourrait agir en partie par une libération de substances opioïdes endogènes et aussi peut-être par d’autres actions neuroendocriniennes restant à explorer.

Par la qualité de la relation avec son patient, et par des propositions thérapeutiques adaptées aux attentes et convictions de celui-ci, le médecin peut accroître son efficacité thérapeutique en ajoutant un puissant effect placebo aux effects spécifiques de son traitement.

Summary

The authors analyse several clinical studies in connection with the analgesic effects of placebo.

Copying the analgesic effects of the prescribed therapeutic, the placebo induces a significant analgesia on an average 35% of patients, or some variations according to the studied pathology and the modalities of the used treatment. The placebo effect is especially influenced by the expectations and the beliefs of the patient, the doctor, the circle and the quality of the relation patient-doctor.

Like a real psychogen analgesia, the placebo could act partly by a liberation of endogenous opioid substances and partly by others neuro-endocrinian activities not yet explored. By the quality of the communication with the patient and by the therapeutic resolutions suitable for his expectation and his belief, the doctor induces an important placebo effect and like that increases the specific effects of his treatment.

Key words

Placebo pain analgesia endorphines 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographie

  1. 1.
    Beecher H. K.: The powerful placebo.JAMA 159, 1602–1606, 1955.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beecher H. K.: Evidence for increased effectiveness of placebos with increased stress.Am. J. Physiology 187, 163–169, 1956.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilsback P., Rolly G. andTampulolon O.: Efficacy of the extradural administration of lofentanil, buprenorphine or saline in the management of post-operative pain.Brit. J. Anaesth. 57, 943–948, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boureau F., Leizorovicz A. etCaulin F.: Effet placebo et douleurs métastatiques osseuses.Press. Med. (à paraître en 1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Branthwaite A. andCooper P.: Analgesic effects of branding in treatment of headaches.Brit. Med. J. 282, 1576–1578, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chadha D. R. andDasilva L. M.: The placebo in clinical psychopharmacology.Current Therapeutic Research 21, 748–752, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen A. C. N. andDworkin S. F.: Cognitive Synergism of Pharmacological Analgesia: A new form for analgesic treatment.In:Advances in Pain Research and Therapy 5, J. J. Bonica et al, Ed. Raven Press, New York, p. 839–845, 1983.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cleghom R. A., Graham B. F., Campbell R. B., Rubleaa N. K., Elliott F. H. andSafran M.: Anxiety states: their response to ACTH and to isotonic saline. In:Proced First Clin. ACTH. Conf. Blakiston, Philadelphia, p. 561–565, 1950.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cobb L. A., Thomas G. I. andDillard D. H.: An evaluation of internal mammary artery ligation by a double blind technic.New Engl. J. Med. 260, 1115–1118, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Conference on Therapy: The use of placebos in therapy. New York State.J. Med. 46, 1718–1727, 1946.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dimond E. G., Kittle C. F. andCrackett J. E.: Comparison of internal mammary artery ligation and sham operation for angina pectoris.Am. J. Cardiology 5, 483–486, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evans F. J.: Placebo response: relationship to suggestibility and hyponotizability.Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 4, 889–890, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evans F. J.: The placebo response in pain reduction.In:Adv. Neurol. 4, Raven Press, New York, 289–296, 1974.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Evans F. J.: Expectancy, therapeutic instructions and the placebo response,.In: Placebo: Theory, Research and Mechanisms. Ed. L. White, B. Tursky, G. E. Schwartz. Guilford Press, p. 215–228, 1985.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gerard M. J., Serrurier D. etLaplanche C.: Influence de la nature de l’affection traitée sur l’effet placebo dans les essais d’anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens.Therapie 38, 415–418, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gracely R. H., Dubner R., Wolskee P. J. andDeeter W. R.: Placebo and naloxone can alter post-surgical pain by separate mechanisms.Nature 306, London, 264–265, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gracely R. H., Dubner R., Deeter W. R. andWolskee P. J.: Clinicians’ expectations influence placebo analgesia.Lancet 1, 43, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grevert P., Albert L. H. andGoldstein A.: Partial antagonism of placebo analgesia by naloxone.Pain 16, 129–143, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gryll S. L. andDasilva L. M.: The placebo effect in clinical psychopharmacology.Current Therapeutic Research 21, 748–752, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hashish I., Harvey W. andHarris M.: Antiinflammatory effects of ultrasound therapy: Evidence for a major placebo effect.Brit. J. Rheumatology 25, 77–81, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hill R. C. andTurner P.: Importance of initial pain in post-operative assessment of analgesic drugs.J. Clin. Pharmacol. 9, 321–327, 1969.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Houde R. W., Wallenstein S. L. andRogers A.: Clinical pharmacology of analgesics. A method of asseying analgesic effect.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1, 163–174, 1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Houde R. W., Wallenstein S. L. andBeaver W. T.: Clinical measurement of pain. In: De Stevens Ed., Analgetics, New York Academic Press, p. 75–122, 1965.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kreitler S., Kreitler H. andCarasso R.: Cognitive orientation as predictor of pain relief following acupuncture.Pain 28, 323–341, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Langley G. B., Sheppeard H. andWigley R. D.: Placebo therapy in rhumatoid arthritis.Clinical and Experimental Rhumatology 1, 17–21, 1983.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lasagna L., Mosteller F., Von Felsinger J. M. andBeecher H. K.: A study of the placebo response.Am J. Med. 16, 770–779, 1954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levine J. D., Gordon N. C. andFields H. L.: The mechanism of placebo analgesia.Lancet 2, 654–657, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Levine J. D., Gordon N. C., Bornstein J. C. andFields H. L.: Role of pain in placebo analgesia.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA76, 3528–3531, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loan W. B., Morrisson J. D. andDundee J. W.: Evaluation of a method for assessing potent analgesics.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 9, 765–776, 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mc Glashan T. H., Evans F. J. andOrne M. T.: The nature of hypnotic analgesic and placebo response to experimental pain.Psychosomatic Medicine 31, 227–246, 1969.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moertel C. G., Taylor W. F., Roth A andTyce F. A. J.: Who responds to sugar pills?Mayo Clin. Proc. 51, 96–100, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nathan P. W.: Success in surgery may not require cutting the tracts.Pain 22, 317–319, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pichot P.: A propos de l’effet placebo.Rev. Med. Psychosom. 3, 37–40, 1961.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ricker K., Clark E. L., Etezady M. H et al.: Butabarbital sodium and chloridazepoxide in anxious patients: a collaborative control study.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 11, 538–550, 1970.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shapiro A. K.: The placebo effect in the history of medical treatment: Implication for psychiatry.Am. J. Psychiatry 116, 298–304, 1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shapiro A. K.: Factors contributing to the placebo effect.Am. J. Psychotherapy 18, 73–88, 1964.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Spriet A. etSimon P.: Placebos et effets placebos.Rev. Med. 7, 341–348, 1978.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thorsteinsson G., Stonnington H., Stiwell G. K. andElveback L. R.: The placebo effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation.Pain 5, 31–41, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Bruxelle
    • 1
  • C. Marquez
    • 1
  • D. Valade
    • 1
  1. 1.Unité de traitement de la douleurHôpital TarnierParis

Personalised recommendations