Nota sobre errores de muestreo

  • Julio Mirás Amor


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BIRBAUM Y SIRKEN, 1950: “On the total error due to non-inter-view and to random sampling”, Int. Jour Opinion Attidude. Res. 4.Google Scholar
  2. COCHRAN, W.G. “Sampling Techniques”.Google Scholar
  3. DEMING (1953): “On a probability mechanism to attain an economic balance between the resultant error of non-response and the bias of non-response”. Jour. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 48.Google Scholar
  4. DURBIN (1954).: “Non-response and call-backs in surveys”, Bull Int. Stat. Inst. 34.Google Scholar
  5. HANSEN Y HURWITZ (1946).: “The problem of non-response in sample surveys”, Jour. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 41.Google Scholar
  6. JOHNSON, N.L. Y HARRY SMITH, Jr. (1969).: “New Developments in Survey Sampling”, (A symposium on the foundations of survey sampling held at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina).Google Scholar
  7. KOOP, J.C.: “Replicated (or interperietrating) samples of unequal size”, Am. Math. Stat. 38.Google Scholar
  8. MAHALANOBIS, (1946): “Recent experiments in statistical sampling in the Indian Statistical Institute”. Jour. Roy. Stat. Soc. 109.Google Scholar
  9. POLITZ Y SIMMONS, (1949–50): “An attempt to get “no at homes” into the sample withont calbacks”, Jour. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 44 y 45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julio Mirás Amor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations