Rendiconti Lincei

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 425–436 | Cite as

Specific identity and taxonomic position of the extinct Quagga

  • Augusto Azzaroli
  • Roscoe Stanyon
Article

Abstract

The present paper discusses the specific identity of two African zebras: the quagga,Equus quagga, exterminated in the last century, and the now widely distributed speciesEquus burchelli. Several authors, on the ground of morphology and more recently also on mitochondrial DNA analysis, expressed the opinion that these two zebras are conspecific. We contend that deductions based on mitochondrial DNA analysis are not cogent, while morphological data give evidence that Quagga and Burchell’s Zebra are two distinct, not closely related species.

Key words

Zebras Mammalia Equidae 

Identità spedfica e posizione tassonomica del Quagga estinto

Riassunto

Viene discussa l’identità specifica di due zebre africane: il quagga, sterminato nel secolo scorso, e la specie tuttora largamente diffusaEquus burchelli. Vari autori, basandosi su analisi morfologiche e recentemente anche su analisi del DNA mitocondriale, hanno espresso l’opinione che queste due zebre appartengano ad un’unica specie. Le deduzioni tratte dal DNA mitocondriale non risultano probative mentre i dati morfologici dimostrano che quagga e zebra di Burchell sono due specie distinte, non strettamente imparentate tra loro.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

a) Historical and morphological analysis.

  1. Azzaroli A., 1966.Pleistocene and Living Horses of the Old World. Palaeontographia Italica, 61: 1–15, Pis. 1–46.Google Scholar
  2. Azzaroli A., 1982.On Villafranchian Palaearctic Equids and their allies. Palaeontographia Italica, 72: 74–97, Pls. 8–11.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdelle E., 1955.Ordre des Périssodactyles. In:P. P. Grassé (ed.),Traité de Zoologie. Tome 17, fascicule 1, Paris: 1002–1126.Google Scholar
  4. Churcher C. S., 1982.Grévy’s - the other zebra. Swara, 5, No. 2: 12–18.Google Scholar
  5. Churcher C. S., 1986.The extinct Cape Zebra. Sagittarius, 1, No. 4: 4–5.Google Scholar
  6. Churcher C. S., 1987.The Cape Zebra, Equus capensis,from coastal sites in the South-western Cape Province. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 7, Supplement to Number 3, Abstr. n. 25.Google Scholar
  7. Cooke H. B. S. 1950.A Critical Revision of the Quaternary Perissodactyls of Southern Africa. Annals of the South African Museum, 31, Part 4: 393–479.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenmann V., 1980.Les Chevaux (Equussensu lato) fossiles et actuels: cranes et dents jugales superieures. Cahiers de Paleontologie, Paris, CNRS, 186 pp., 22 Pls.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenmann V., 1981.Etude des dents jugales inférieures des Equus(Mammalia, Perissodactyla) actuels et fossiles. Palaeovertebrata, 10: 127–226, 4 Pls.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenmann V., 1983.Family Equidae. In:R. E. Leakey, G. LL. Isaac (eds.),Koobi Fora Research Project. Clarendon Press, Oxford, vol. 2: 156–214.Google Scholar
  11. Eisenmann V., 1985.Le couagga: un zébre aux origines douteuses. La Recherche, 16, No. 163: 254–256.Google Scholar
  12. George M. Jr., Ryder O. A., 1986.Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the genus Equus. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 3(6): 535–546.Google Scholar
  13. Groves C. P., Willoughby D. P., 1981.Studies on the Taxonomy and Phytogeny of the genus Equus.I. Subgeneric classification of the recent species. Mammalia, 45: 321–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grzimek B., 1972.Vita degli Animali. Bramante, Milano, vol. 13, 567 pp., figs.Google Scholar
  15. Roberts A., 1951.The Mammals of South Africa. Trustees of «The Mammals of South Africa» Book Fund: xlviii + 700 pp., XXIII + LIV Pls.Google Scholar
  16. Simpson G. G., 1951.Horses. Oxford University Press, New York, xix + 247 pp., XXXII Pls.Google Scholar
  17. Walker E. P., 1983.Mammals of the World.R. M. Nowak, J. L. Paradiso (eds.), John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore-London, 4th ed., vol. 2, i-xxxv + 569–1362.Google Scholar
  18. Willoughby D. P., 1974.The Empire of Equus. A.C. Barnes & Co., Inc., Cranbury N.J., 475 pp., figs.Google Scholar

b) Validity of mitochondrial DNA analysis.

  1. Darlu P., Tassy P., 1987.Roots (a comment on the evolution of human mitochondrial DNA and the origins of modern humans). Hum. Evol., 2: 407–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Excoffier L., Langaney A., 1989.Origin and differentiation of human mitochondrial DNA. Am. J. Human Genet., 44: 73–85.Google Scholar
  3. Fitch W. A., 1986.An estimation of the number of invariable sites is necessary for the accurate estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions since a common ancestor. In:Evolutionary perspective and the neiu Genetics. Alan Liss, New York: 149–159.Google Scholar
  4. Saitou N., Nei M., 1986.The number of nucleotides required to determine the branching order of three species with special reference to the human-chimpanzee-gorilla divergence. J. Mol. Evol., 24: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Smouse P. E., Li W. H., 1987.Likelihood analysis of mitochondrial restriction-cleavage patterns of the human- chimpanzee-gorilla trichotomy. Evolution, 4: 1162–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Templeton A. R., 1983.Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution, 37: 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Accademia nazionale dei Lincei 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Augusto Azzaroli
    • 1
  • Roscoe Stanyon
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze della TerraUniversita degli Studi di FircnzeFirfenze
  2. 2.Istituto di Antropologia FisicaUniversit’ degli Studi di GenevaGenova

Personalised recommendations