The American Journal of Digestive Diseases

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 252–254 | Cite as

Diverticulum of the stomach

  • Ellis B. Freilich
  • Gerhard Danelius
  • George C. Coe
Roentgenology
Received:

Conclusions

We are reporting another case of diverticulum of the stomach. The diagnosis here was not made clinically and up to the present time, pre-operatively or ante-mortem can only be made roentgenographically. We feel that by means of the X-ray the diagnosis can be made sufficiently early to give the clinician an opportunity of carefully studying these cases in the hope of building up a symptomatology which will be suggestive, if not diagnostic, of this condition. the matter of differential diagnosis between a diverticulum and an ulcer is important inasmuch as surgical indications are dependent upon the type of pathology present.

Keywords

Appendicitis Diverticulitis Pleurisy Recumbent Position Mucosal Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rivers, Stevens, and Kirklin: Diverticula of the Stomach.S. G. O., Jan. 5, 1935. Diverticulum Causing Pseudoulcerous Symptoms.Bull. A. Mem. Soc. Nat. de Chir., 60:580–6, April 28, 1934.Google Scholar
  2. Gutzeit: Diverticula and Diverticular Formations.Dtsch. Arch. f. klin. Med., 175:291–301, 1933.Google Scholar
  3. Barsony: Diverticula, Clinical and X-ray Study.Wien. klin. Woc., 45:1089–91, Sept. 2, 1932.Google Scholar
  4. Lenarduzzi: Congenital Diverticula of the Stomach.Arch. di. rad., 8:444–56, May–June, 1932.Google Scholar
  5. Laurell: Diverticula of the Stomach.Act. radiol., 12:455–78, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gile: Diverticula of the Stomach.New Engl. Med. J., 204:268–9, Feb. 5, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruckner: Diverticula Near the Cardia.Roentg.-Prax., 3:13–5, Jan. 15, 1931.Google Scholar
  8. Benedetti: False Diverticulum (6 cases).Arch. di radiol., 6:523–30, May–June, 1930.Google Scholar
  9. Bell and Golden: Diverticula of the Stomach.J. A. M. A., 94:534–9, 1930.Google Scholar
  10. Beutel: Symptomatology and X-ray Diagnosis of Diverticulum Near Cardia.Fortschr. Roentgenstr., 41:630–35, 1930.Google Scholar
  11. Geyman: Diverticula of the Stomach.Californ. and West Med., 33:813–14, 1930.Google Scholar
  12. Ottonello: Differential and X-ray Diagnosis.Poliklinico (lez. med.), 37:482–93, Oct., 1930.Google Scholar
  13. Sinclair: Diverticulum of Stomach in an Infant.Brit. J. Surg., 17:182–4, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liljedahl: Diverticula of Stomach.Am. J. Roentgen., 22:258–9, Sept., 1929.Google Scholar
  15. Sandstroehm: X-ray Appearances of Diverticula of the Stomach.Ach. radiol., 10:427–36, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freedman: Perforating Ulcer Simulating Diverticula.Amer. J. Roentgen., 18:47–51, July, 1927.Google Scholar
  17. Brandt: Diverticula of the Stomach.Frankf. Ztschr. f. Pathol., 34:527–31, 1926.Google Scholar
  18. Akerlund: Diverticula of the Stomach From a Roentgenolog. Point of View.Act. radiol., 2:476–85, 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Albrecht: Die Roentgendiagnostik des Verdauungskanals. G. Thieme, Leipzig, 1931.Google Scholar
  20. Assmann: Klinische Röntgendiagnostik der inneren Erkrankungen. F. C. W. Vogel, Leipzig, 1933.Google Scholar
  21. Berg: (in Mohr-Stähelin: Handbuch der inneren Medizin., Vol. II). J. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1935

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellis B. Freilich
    • 1
  • Gerhard Danelius
    • 1
  • George C. Coe
    • 1
  1. 1.Chicago

Personalised recommendations