Advertisement

The American Journal of Digestive Diseases

, Volume 11, Issue 10, pp 319–322 | Cite as

Prevention of gastric ulcer formation during the alarm reaction

  • Hans Selye
  • Alan Maclean
Article

Summary

Experiments in albino rats indicate that the gastric ulcers which appear in the course of a severe alarm reaction (produced by high spinal cord transection) may be prevented by the prophylactic administration of various food substances, aluminum hydroxide gel and especially by comparatively small doses of dextrose. Dextrose is effective when given either per os or intravenously. It prevents gastric ulcer formation even in doses insufficient to raise the glucose content of the blood above the normal level for the duration of the experiment. The prophylactic effect of dextrose is non-specific in the sense that the compound prevents the formation of gastric ulcers by a variety of widely different damaging agents such as formaldehyde injections, exposure to cold or spinal cord transection.

Keywords

Peptic Ulcer Gastric Ulcer Food Substance Prophylactic Effect Ulcer Formation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Selye, H.: The alarm reaction. G. M. Piersol’s Cyclopedia of Medicine. F. A. Davis Co. Publ., Philadelphia 15: 15, 1940.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jennings, D.: Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet 242: 573, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    —Perforated peptic ulcer during air-raiding. Lancet 242: 365, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stewart, D. N. and D. M.de R. Winser: Incidence of perforated peptic ulcer effect of heavy air-raids. Lancet 242: 259, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    —Perforated peptic ulcer during air-raiding. Lancet 242: 460, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson, A. K.: Perforated peptic ulcer in air-raids. Lancet 242: 335, 1942.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selye, H.: Perforated peptic ulcer during air-raids. Lancet 244: 252, 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rendle-Short, J.: Perforated peptic ulcer during air- raiding. Lancet 242: 429, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riley, I. D.: Perforated peptic ulcer in war-time. Lancet 243: 485, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allison, R. S.: Peptic ulcer in the Royal Navy. Etiology. Lancet 240: 596, 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomas, H. M. Jr.: Peptic ulcer in the army. Southern Med. J. 36: 287, 1943.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Graham, J. G. and J. D. O. Kerr : Digestive disorders in the forces. Brit. Med. J. 1941: 473.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Selye, H. and C. Dosne: Changes in the chemical composition of the blood coming from damaged tissues. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med. 47: 143, 1941.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hurst, A. : Wartime diet for peptic ulcer patients. Brit. Med. J. 1943: 523.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rowe, J. B. W. : Wartime diet for peptic ulcer patients. Brit. Med. J.1943: 464.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Somogyi, M.: Notes on sugar determination. J. Biol. Chem.70. 599, 1926.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1944

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Selye
    • 1
  • Alan Maclean
    • 2
  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of AnatomyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations