An assessment of biodiversity hotspots using remote sensing and GIS

  • Hua Shi
  • Ashbindu Singh


This study focuses on the assessment of the status of world’s remaining closed forests (WRCF), population distribution, and protected areas in global biodiversity hotspots using remote sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS). Conservation International (CI) has identified 25 eco-regions, called biodiversity hotspots that are especially rich in endemic species and are particularly threatened by human activities. This study uses globally consistent and comprehensive geo-spatial data sets generated using rerriote sensing and other sources, and the application of GIS layering methods. The consistent data set has made it possible to identify and quantify relationships between the WRCF, human population, and protected areas in biodiversity hotspots. It is expected that such information will provide a scientific basis for biodiversity hotspots management and assist in policy formulations at the national and international levels.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. CI, (2001). Biodiversity hotspots database. Conservation International, Washington D. C, ( Scholar
  2. ERDAS Imagine, IMAGINE -Version 8.3 (ERDAS) for stratification and digitizing of vector polygons; ENVI (Research Systems, Inc) for image interpretation, graphical analysis and determining models; and Land Analysis System (public domain) for modeling. Arc/Info analysis was performed using software donated by the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Loveland, T.R., Reed, B.C., Zhu, Z., Yang, L, and Merchant, J. W. (2000). Developments of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP discover from 1-km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 21 (6 and 7):1303–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Robles Gil, P. and Mittermeier, CG. (1999). Hotspots: Earth’s Biodiversity Richest and Most Threatened Ecosystems. CEMEX, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  5. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 24 February, pp. 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Singh, A., Shi, H., Fosnight, E. A. and Foresman, T. (2001). An assessment of the world remaining closed forests. Ambio, 30(l):67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. UNESCO, (1973). International Classification and Mapping of Vegetation, 23. Organization for Education, Science and Culture (UNESCO), Paris, France.Google Scholar
  8. UN-WCMC, (2001). Protected Areas Database. CD-ROM, Cambridge, United Kingdom: UN-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UN-WCMC).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hua Shi
    • 1
  • Ashbindu Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Environmental InformationAssessment and Early Warning - North America USGS/EROS Data CenterSioux FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations