Paläontologische Zeitschrift

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 196–203

Cetacean remains from the Neogene of northwestern Venezuela

Article

Abstract

Cetacean remains from two different stratigraphic units exposed in Falcon State, northwestern Venezuela, are described. The first record is derived from the Lower Miocene Cantaure Formation and the second from the Lower Pliocene Punta Gavilán Formation, The two specimens are identified as an indeterminate species of a platanistoid Squalodelphinidae, and an indeterminate cetothere or balaenopterid, respectively.

Keywords

Cetacea Squalodelphinidae Cetotheriidae Balaenopteridae Neogene Caribbean 

Zusammenfassung

Neue Funde von Cetacea werden von zwei unterschiedlichen stratigraphischen Einheiten aus dem Staat Falcon, NW-Venezuela, beschrieben. Der erste Fund stammt aus der unter-miozänen Cantaure-Formation, der zweite aus der unter-pliozänen Punta Gavilän-Formation. Eines der beiden Stücke gehört zu einer bisher unbeschriebenen Art platanistoider Squalodelphinidae und das andere zu einem unbestimmten Cetotheren oder Balaenopteriden.

Schlüsselwörter

Cetacea Squalodelphinidae Cetotheriidae Balaenopteridae Neogen Karibik 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguilera, O. 2004. Tesoros paleontolögicos de Venezuela: Urumaco, Patrimonio Natural de la Humanidad. — 147 p., Caracas (Editorial Arte)Google Scholar
  2. Aguilera, O. &Rodrigues De Aguilera, D. 2001. An exceptional upwelling fish assemblages in the Caribbean Neogene. — Journal of Paleontology75: 732–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguilera, O. &Rodrigues De Aguilera, D. 2004. New Miocene otolith-based sciaenid species (Pisces, Perciformes) from Venezuela. — In:Sänchez-Vlllagra, M.R. &Clack, J.A., eds., Fossils from the Castillo Formation, Lower Miocene of north-western Venezuela: contributions in neotropical palaeontology. — Special Papers in Palaeontology71: 49–59.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, L.G. &McLeod, S.A. 1984. The fossil record and phyletic relationships of gray whales. — In:Jones, M.L.;Leatherwood, S. &Swartz, S.L., eds., The gray whale: 3–32, New York (Academic Press).Google Scholar
  5. Bouetel, V. &de Muizon, Ch. 2006. The anatomy and relationships ofPiscobalaena nana (Cetacea, Mysticeti), a Cetotheriidae s.s. from the early Pliocene of Peru. — Geodiversitas28: 319–395.Google Scholar
  6. Brisson, M. J. 1762. Regnum Animale in Classes IX distributum, sive Synopsis methodica sistens classium, quadripedum scilicet & cetaceorum, particularum divisionem in ordines, sectiones, genera & species. Editio altera auctior (Second edition). — 296 p., Leiden (Theodorum Haak, Lunduni Batavorum).Google Scholar
  7. Cope, E.D. 1891. Syllabus of lectures on geology and paleontology. — 90 p., Philadelphia (Ferris Brothers).Google Scholar
  8. Cozzuol, M.A. 1996. The record of the aquatic mammals in southern South America. — Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen30: 321–342.Google Scholar
  9. Dal Piaz, G. 1917. Gli Odontoceti del Miocene bellunese, Parte Terza.Squalodelphis fabiannii. — Memorie dell’Instituto Geologico della R. Universita di Padova5: 1–34.Google Scholar
  10. Flower, W.H. 1867. Description of the skeleton ofInia geoffrensis and the skull ofPontoporia blainvillii, with remarks on the systematic position of these animals in the order Cetacea. — Transactions of the Zoological Society of London6: 87–116.Google Scholar
  11. Fordyce, R.E. &de Muizon, Ch. 2001. Evolutionary history of cetaceans: a review. — In:Mazin, J.M. &de Buffrenil, V, eds., Secondary adaptation of tetrapods to life in water: 169–233, München (F. Pfeil).Google Scholar
  12. Linares, O.J. 2004. Bioestratigrafía de la fauna de mamíferos de las formaciones Socorro, Urumaco y Codore (Mioceno medio-Plioceno temprano) de la regiön de Urumaco, Falcön, Venezuela. — Paleobiología Neotropical1: 1–26 (http://www.paleobio.labb.usb.ve/revista.html).Google Scholar
  13. Machado, A.;Marcano, R.;Castro, M. &Padrön, V. 1996. Nannoplancton calcäreo de la Formatión Punta Gavilän, estado Falcön (Resumen). — Acta Científica Venezolana47: 301–302.Google Scholar
  14. Marino, L.;Uhen, M.D.;Pyenson, N.D. &Frohlich, B. 2003. Reconstructing cetacean brain evolution using computed tomography. — The Anatomical Record, Part B: New Anat.272B: 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marino, L.;McShea, D.W. &Uhen, M.D. 2004. Origin and evolution of large brains in toothed whales. — The Anatomical Record, Part A281A: 1247–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ministerio de Energía y Minas. 1997. Léxico Estratigráfico de Venezuela (Tercera Ediciön). — Boletín de Geología12: 1–828.Google Scholar
  17. Muizon, C. De 1987. The affinities ofNotocetus vanbenedeni, an early Miocene platanistoid (Cetacea, Mammalia) from Patagonia, Southern Argentina. — American Museum Novitates2904: 1–27.Google Scholar
  18. Muizon, C. De 1988. Le polyphlétisme des Acrodelphidae, Odontocètes longirostres du Miocene européen. — Bulletin Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris (4),10, sect. C (1): 31–88.Google Scholar
  19. Nolf, D. &Aguilera, O. 1998. Fish otoliths from the Cantaure Formation (early Miocene of Venezuela). — Bulletin de FInstitute Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre68: 237–262.Google Scholar
  20. O’Leary, M.A. 2004. A fragmentary Odontocete cranium from the lower Miocene of Venezuela. — In:Sänchez-Vlllagra, M.R. &Clack, J.A., eds., Fossils from the Castillo Formation, lower Miocene of north-western Venezuela: contributions in neotropical palaeontology. — Special Papers in Palaeontology71: 99–104.Google Scholar
  21. Pilleri, G. &Gihr, M. 1981. The brain (endocranial cast) ofSchizodelphis sulcatus and the cephalization ofEoplatanista italica (Cetacea): Palaeoneurological and palaeoecological considerations. — Memoires in Sciences and Geology34: 387–440.Google Scholar
  22. Sänchez-Vlllagra, M.R.;Burnham, R.J.;Campbell, D.C.;Feldmann, R.M.;Gaffney, E.S.;Kay, R.F.;Lozsän, R.;Purdy, R. &Thewissen, J.G.M. 2000. A new near-shore marine fauna and flora from the Early Neogene of northwestern Venezuela. — Journal of Paleontology74: 957–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sänchez-Vlllagra, M.R.;Gasparini, Z.;Lozsän, R.;Moody, J.M. &Uhen, M.D. 2001. New discoveries of vertebrates from a near-shore marine fauna from the Early Miocene of northwestern Venezuela. — Paläontologische Zeitschrift75: 227–232.Google Scholar
  24. Simpson, G.G. 1945. The principles of Classification and a Classification of mammals. — Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History85: 1–350.Google Scholar
  25. True, F.W. 1910. Description of a skull and some vertebrae of the fossil cetaceanDiochocetus vanbenedeni from Santa Cruz, Patagonia. — Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History28: 19–32.Google Scholar
  26. Van Der Bold, W.A. 1973. Nota geológica: nota sobre los ostrácodos de la Formación Punta Gavilán. — Boletín de Geología12: 333–335.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo Horizonte, MGBrazil
  2. 2.Universidad Nacional Experimental Francisco de MirandaCentro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Básicas, Complejo Docente Los PerozosEstado FalcónVenezuela

Personalised recommendations