Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 105–110 | Cite as

The newly proposed EU risk assessment concept for the sediment compartment

Enforcement of environmental legislation

Abstract

Within the frame of the EU Existing Chemicals Regulation (793/93/EEC), a new concept for the assessment of the sediment compartment has been developed. During the assessment process it has become clear that for substances that strongly adsorb or bind to sediment the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM) presently employed is not sufficient. The new approach is therefore based on long-term sediment tests with benthic organisms. A testing strategy has been developed which considers species which represent different habitats and feeding strategies in order to adequately address all possible routes of exposure. The new concept has proven to be valuable in risk assessments, two examples (3,4-DCA, DODMAC) of which are shown in more detail.

Keywords

3,4-DCA, DODMAC bioavailability Chironomus sp. equilibrium partitioning method Lumbriculus variegatus risk assessment sediment tests 

Glossary

Kow

octanol-water partitioning coefficient

Koc

partition coefficent organic carbon-water

NOEC

no observed effect concentration

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ASTM (1994): Standard guide for conduction sediment toxicity tests with freshwater invertebrates (E-1383-94a) American Society for Testing and Materials, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Di Toro DM et al. (1991): Technical basis for establishing sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic chemicals using equilibrium partitioning. Environ Toxicol Chem10, 1541–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ECETOC (2000): Effects assessment for sediment. TGD/E/EF/ COM/D4; unpublished discussion documentGoogle Scholar
  4. Forbes TL et al. (1998): Relative role of pore water versus ingested sediment in bioavailability of organic contaminants in marine sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem17, 2453–2462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harkey GA et al. (1994): Comparison of whole-sediment, elutriate and pore water exposures for use in assessing sediment-associated organic contaminants in bioassays. Environ Toxicol Chem13, 1315–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Höss et al. (1997): Influence on particle size distributions and content of organic matter on the toxicity of copper in sediment bioassays usingCaenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda). Water Air Soil Poll99, 689–695Google Scholar
  7. Lamoureux EM, Brownawell BJ (1999): Chemical and biological availability of sediment-sorbed hydrophobic organic contaminants. Environ Toxciol Chem18, 1733–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. LoonenH et al. (1997): Bioaccumulation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in sediment by oligochaetes: Influence of exposure pathway and contact time. Environ Toxicol Chem16, 1518–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2000): Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 218: Chironomid toxicity test using spiked sediment (draft). ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Oetken M, Ludwichowski K-U, Nagel R (2001): Validation of the preliminary EU-concept of assessing the impact of chemicals to organisms in sediment by using selected substances. By order of the Federal Environmental Agency, FKZ 299 67 411, March 2001Google Scholar
  11. Pascoe D et al. (1992): Development and validation of methods for evaluating chronic toxicity to freshwater ecosystems. Final summary report of the environmental research programme assessment of risks associated with chemicals (Ecotoxicology). EEC RTD Contract EV4V-0110-UK(BA)Google Scholar
  12. Phipps GL et al. (1983): Use of the aquatic oligochaeteLumbriculus variegatus for assessing the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants. Environ Toxicol Chem12, 269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reynoldson TB et al. (1991): A sediment bioassay using the tubificid oligochaete wormTubifex tubifex. Environ Toxicol Chem10, 1061–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. RAR 3,4-DCA (2001): Draft European Union Risk Assessment Report: 3,4-Dichloroaniline (3,4-DCA), June 2001Google Scholar
  15. RAR DODMAC (2001): Draft European Union Risk Assessment Report: Dimethyldioctadecylammonium chloride (DODMAC), April 2001Google Scholar
  16. Technical Guidance document in Support of the Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances and the Commission Regulation (EC) 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing SubstancesGoogle Scholar
  17. TraunspurgerW et al. (1997): Ecotoxicological assessment of aquatic sediments withCaenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda) — A method for testing liquid medium and whole-sediment samples. Environ Toxicol Chem16, 245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft AG & Co. KG 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Environmental Agency (UBA)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations