Advertisement

Journal of Genetics

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 109–127 | Cite as

The genetics of the fowl

I. The inheritance of frizzled plumage
  • F. B. Hutt
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    An investigation has been conducted to determine the mode of inheritance of frizzling in the domestic fowl and to substantiate or disprove the current theory that homozygosity for frizzling is lethal.

     
  2. 2.

    Two types of frizzling, ordinary and extreme, are differentiated.

     
  3. 3.

    Incubation records failed to show any evidence of a zygotic lethal factor being operative during embryonic development. It was found that no gametic lethal factors are involved.

     
  4. 4.

    Mating of ordinary Frizzles to normally feathered fowls produced the 1:1 ratio of parent phaenotypes expected in a back cross to a recessive. Offspring from matingsinter se of normally feathered fowls extracted from matings of Frizzle x Frizzle were all normal.

     
  5. 5.

    The progeny from matingsinter se of ordinary Frizzles gave a 3:1 ratio of Frizzles to Normals and in a random sample of this population the ratio of extreme to ordinary Frizzles was as 1:2.

     
  6. 6.

    Five extreme Frizzles were tested and proved to be homozygous for the character, producing, when mated with a normally feathered male, only chicks showing the ordinary type of frizzling.

     
  7. 7.

    Eighteen ordinary Frizzles were tested and found to be heterozygous.

     
  8. 8.

    Reciprocal crosses showed that the character is not sex-linked.

     

Keywords

Barb Reciprocal Cross Lethal Factor Domestic Fowl Extreme Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrovandtjs, Ulyssis. (1600).Ornithologiae. Tomns Alter, p. 329.Google Scholar
  2. Buffon, Leclerc (1799).Histoire Naturelle, xli, 189–90.Google Scholar
  3. Darwin, Charles (1875).The Variation of Animais and Plants under Domestication. 2nd ed. i, 241. London, John Murray.Google Scholar
  4. Davenport, C. B. (1906). “Inheritance in ponltry.”Carnegie Inslit. of Washington Publ. No. 52.Google Scholar
  5. Dürigen, Bruno (1923).Die Geflügelzucht. Vierte und fünfte Auflage, i, 222. Berlin, Paul Parey.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, R. A. (1928).Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  7. Kirk, L. S. andImmer, F. R. (1928). “Application of goodness of fit tests to Mendelian class frequencies.”Scientific Agriculture, viii, No. 12, pp. 745–50.Google Scholar
  8. Linné, Caul von (1758).Systema Naturae. Edit. Decima.Google Scholar
  9. Marsden, William (1784).History of Sumatra. 2nd ed. p. 98. London.Google Scholar
  10. Tegetmeier, W. B. (1887).The Poultry Book, p. 226. London, Geo. Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1930

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. B. Hutt
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Poultry HusbandryUniversity of Minnesota St PaulMinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations