Advertisement

Journal of Genetics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 47–89 | Cite as

The law of homologous series in variation

  • N. I. Vavilov
Article

Keywords

Melon Homologous Series Wild Barley Cucurbita Pepo Botanical Variety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Engler,Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 8te Auflage, 1919.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Musée helvétique, p. 115 (Aconitum).Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Darwin,Variation of Animals and Plants, Part 2; “Analogous or Parallei Variation.”Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    G. H. T. Eimer,Die Entstehung der Arten auf Grund von erworbener Eigenschaften nach den Gesetzen organischen Wachsens, Vols. i-iii. 1888–1901, Iena.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. A. Saeeardo, “I Prevedibilli Funghi Futuri secondo la Legge d’ Analogia.”Degli Atti del R. Instituto Veneti de Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, Tomo viii. Ser. 7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Zederbauer, “Variationsrichtungen der Nadelhölzer.”Sitzberichte d. Akademic d. Wissenschaften, Wien, Math. Nat. Klasse, 116, Abt. i. 1907.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    N. I. Vavilov, “Immunity of Plants to Infectious Diseases,” 1919, Oh. v.Annales de l’Acad’mie Agronomique Petrovskoé (près Moscow), Année 1918. (With a résumé in English.) “Immunity to Fungous Diseases as a Physiological Test in Genetics and Systematics, exemplified in Cereals.”Journal of Genetics, Vol. iv. No. 1, June, 1914.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. A. Flaksberger, “Triticummonococcnm L.”Bulletin of Applied Botany, 1914, Petrograd.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    This Linnean species is divided, according to F. Koernicke (Handbuch der Getreide, 1885) and K. A. Flaksberger (“Determination of Wheats.”Bulletin of Applied Botany, Petrograd, 1915), into 26 botanical varieties, each of which is of collective nature and consists of a. number of races.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    G. S. Zaitsev, “The Resulta of CrossingGossypium hirsutum andG. herbaceum.” Bulletin of Applied Botany (Petrograd). At present in the press.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Darwin,Variation, Part ii. New York edition, 1876, p. 341.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Several varieties of Abyssinian wheat (Triticum durum) have brown-purple seeds, cf. A. St C. Capom,Journ. Gen. yii. 1918, p. 261.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    G. K. Meister, “Hybrids of Wheat and Rye.”Report of the Third All-Russian Conference of Plant Breeding, Vol. i. 1920.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    For details see N. I. Vavilóv,Immunity of Plants to Infectious Diseases, 1919, Ch. 4.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Pflanzenzuchtung, Dritte Auflage, 1919.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    S. I. Korshinski, “Bastarde zwischenGitrullus vulgaris andCucumis Meio.” Bulletin de l’Académie des Sciences de St Pétersbourg, 1897.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    F. Koernicke,Handbuch der Getrcide, Vol. i. Bd. 1885.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Dr R. A. Emerson, “The inheritance of ligule and auricules of corn-leaves.”Ann. Rpt. of Nebraska Expt. Sta. Res. Bull. 25, pp. 81–88.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    G. V. Ubisch, “Beitrag zu einer Faktorenanalyse von Gerste.”Zeitsch. f. induktive Abstammmgsund Vererbungslehre, 1921, Ch. 25, H. 3/4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. A. Flaksberger, “Wheats of Sounpan” (China).Bullctin of Applied Botany, Petrograd, 1910. John Percival,Wheat Plant. A monograph, 1921.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Cicer arietinum. Memoirs of the Department of Agriculture of India. Bot. Ser. Vol. vii. 1915.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Memoirs of the Department of Agriculture of India. Botanical Series, 1915.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    Miss E. M. Pachek and Prof. A. I. Stebout, “Sunflower.”Report of Saratov Experimental Station, 1915. Miss E. M. Plachek, “Materials for the Classification of Sunflowers.”Report of the third All-Russian Conference on Plant Breeding, Saratov, 1920.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Memoirs of the Department of Agriculture of India. Botanical Series, 1915.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Zederbauer, “Variationsrichtungen der Nadelhölzer.”Sitzher. d. Akad. Wiss. Wein. Math. Nat. Klasse 116, Abt. 1, 1907.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    N, I. Vavilov and Miss E. S. Kouznetzov, “On the Genetic Nature of Spring and Winter Varieties of Plants.”Annals of Agricultural College of Saratov University, Vol. i. 1921. (Résumé in English.)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Koernicke,Handbuch der Getreide, 1885, Bd. 2.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. A. Flaksberger, “Triticnmdicoccoides Kcke-Wild Emmers.”Bulletin of Applied Botany, 1913 (Petrograd). R. Begel, “Les Orges Cultivées de Bussie.”Bulletin of Applied Botany, 1910 (Petrograd).Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    N. I. Vavilov, “On Origin of Smooth Awned Barleys.”Bulletin of Applied Botany, 1919. (Petrograd.)Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Prof. S. I. Jegalov, “Hybrids of Oats.”Report of the Third All-Russian Conference on Plant Breeding, pp. 80–86, 1920, Vol. i.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Penzig,Teratologie, 1, 2, Bd. Second edition, 1920.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammung s und Vererbungslehre, 1914.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    “Suppression and Loss of Characters in Sunflowers.”Science, Vol. xl. No. 1025, 1914, p. 283.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. H. Morgan,Physical Basis of Heredity, 1919. A. H. Sturtevant, “A Parallel Mutation inDrosophila funcbris.” Science, 1918, Vol. xlviii. A. Weinstein, “Homologous genes and linear linkage inDrosophila virilis” Proc. of the National Acad. of Sciences, Vol. vi. No. 11, 1920.Google Scholar
  1. 3.
    “Studies in Juglans,iii. A parallel mutation inJuglans hindsii.” U. C. Pub. Agr. Sci. 2. 3, 1916.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    R. R. Gates,Mutations and Evolution. London, 1921.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Degli Atti del R. Instituto Veneti de Scienze, Lettere cd Arti. Tomo, viii. Ser. vii. Orin Tabulae Analogical Omnium Gener. Fung. Syll. Vol. xi. 1896–97.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    A. Lang,Ergebnisse der Mendelforschungen. Jena, 1914. Castle,Genetics and Eugenics, 1920.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    See R. C. Punnett,Mimicry in Butterflies. Cambridge, 1915.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. I. Baroulina, “On Vetches (Vicia sativa) weeds in lentils.” (Mimicry in Plants.)Report of Third All-Russian Conference on Plant Breeding, held in June, 1920, Vol. 1.Google Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    R. Punnett,Mimicry in Butterflies. Cambridge, 1915. H. Eltringham. “On Specific and Mimetic Eelationships in the genus Heliconius.”Trans. of the Entomological Society of London, 1916.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linden, Gräfen U. v. “Unabhängiger Entwicklungsgleicheit bei Schneckengehäusen.”Biologisches Centralblatt, Bd. xviii. 1898.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dr F. Alverdes, “Die gleichgerichtete stanunesgeschichte Entwicklung der Vögel und Säugetiere.Biologisch. Centr. 39 Bd. September, 1919.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1922

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. I. Vavilov
    • 1
  1. 1.Bureau of Applied Botany and Plant BreedingPetrogradRussia

Personalised recommendations