Advertisement

Journal of Genetics

, Volume 41, Issue 2–3, pp 217–253 | Cite as

Intergeneric hybrids ofSaccharum

  • E. K. Janaki-Ammal
Article

Keywords

Cane Sugar Cane Pollen Fertility Pollen Mother Cell Metaphase Plate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber, C. A. (1916). “Studies in Indian sugar canes. II.”Mem. Dep. Agric. India, Bot. Ser.8, 103–99.Google Scholar
  2. Bews, J. W. (1929).The World’s Grasses. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  3. Bourne, B. A. (1935). “A comparative study of certain morphological characters of sugar cane × Sorgho hybrids.”J. agric. Res. 50, 538–51.Google Scholar
  4. Brandes, E. W. (1936). “Sugar cane, its origin and improvement.”U.S. Dep. Agric. Yearb. 1936, pp. 561–611.Google Scholar
  5. Bremer, G. (1923). “A cytological investigation of some species and species hybrids within the genusSaccharum.”Genetica,5, 97–148, 273–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. —— (1925). “The cytology of the sugar cane. III. The chromosomes of primitive forms of the genusSaccharum.”Genetica,7, 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. -- (1928). “De cytologie van het suikerriet. IV. Een cytologisch onderzoek der bastaarden tusschen Saccharum officinarum en Saccharum spontaneum.”Arch. Suikerind. Ned.-Ind. pp. 565–696.Google Scholar
  8. -- (1929). “The cytology ofSaccharum.”Proc. 3rd Cong. Internat. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. (Sourabaya), pp. 408–15.Google Scholar
  9. Darlington, C. D. (1937).Recent Advances in Cytology. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
  10. Deerr, N. (1921).Cane Sugar. London: Rodger.Google Scholar
  11. Dutt, N. L. &Subba Rao, K. S. (1933). “Observations on the cytology of the sugar cane.”Ind. J. agric. Sci. 3, 37–56.Google Scholar
  12. Earle, F. S. (1928).Sugar Cane and its Culture. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Janaki-Ammal, E. K. (1936). “Cytogenetic analysis ofSaccharum spontaneum chromosome studies in some Indian forms.”Ind. J. agric. Sci. 6, 1–8.Google Scholar
  14. —— (1938a). “ASaccharum-Zea cross.”Nature, Lond.,142, 618–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. -- (1938b). “Chromosome behaviour inS. spontaneum × Sorghum durra hybrids.”Ind. Sci. Cong. 1938 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  16. —— (1938c). “Chromosome numbers in sugar cane × bamboo hybrids.”Nature, Lond.,141, 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. —— (1939). “Triplopolyploidy inSaccharum spontaneum L.”Curr. Sci. 8, 74–6.Google Scholar
  18. —— (1936–9).Reports on the work done under the scheme for research on the genetics of sugar cane. Simla: Govt. India Press.Google Scholar
  19. Janaki-Ammal, E. K. &Singh, T. S. N. (1936). “A preliminary note on a newSaccharum × Sorghum hybrid.”Ind. J. agric. Sci. 6, 1105–6.Google Scholar
  20. McClintock, B. (1929). “A method of making acetocarmine smears permanent.”Stain Techn. 4, 53–6.Google Scholar
  21. Mangelsdorf, P. C. &Reeves, R. G. (1932). “Tripsacum-Zea hybrids.”Proc. 6th Int. Genet. Cong., Ithaca,2, 351.Google Scholar
  22. -- -- (1939). “The origin of Indian Corn and its relatives.”Bull. Texas agric. Exp. Sta. no. 574.Google Scholar
  23. Narayanaswamy, S. (1940). “Megasporogenesis and the origin of triploidy inSaccharum.”Ind. J. agric. Sci. (in the Press).Google Scholar
  24. Peto, F. H. (1934). “The cytology of certain intergeneric hybrids betweenFestuca andLolium.”J. Genet. 28, 113–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rumke, C. L. (1934). “Saccharum-Erianthus Bastaarden.”Arch. Suikerind. Ned.-Ind. pp. 211–63.Google Scholar
  26. Singh, T. S. N. (1934). “Chromosome number in sugar cane ×Sorghum hybrids.”Ind. J. agric. Sci. 4, 1050.Google Scholar
  27. Thomas, R. &Venkatraman, T. S. (1930). “Sugar-Sorghum hybrids.”Agric. J. Ind. 25, 164.Google Scholar
  28. Venkatraman, T. S. (1937). “Sugar cane × bamboo hybrids.”Ind. J. agric. Sci. 7, 513.Google Scholar
  29. -- (1938). “Hybridization in and with the genusSaccharum (its scientific and economic aspects).”Pres. Address, 25th Ind. Sci. Cong., Calcutta, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  30. Venkatraman, T. S. &Thomas, K. (1930). “Brief note on sugar cane-Sorghum hybrids.”4th Cong. Internat. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.Google Scholar
  31. Venkatraman, T. S. (1935). “Report of the government sugarcane expert.”Sci. Rep. Imp. Inst. agric. Res. Pusa, 1934–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1941

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. K. Janaki-Ammal
    • 1
  1. 1.John Innes Horticultural InstitutionMerton

Personalised recommendations