Journal of Genetics

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 97–128 | Cite as

The variation system inCampanula persicifolia

  • C. D. Darlington
  • A. E. Gairdner

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, E. G. (1935). “Chromosomal interchanges in maize.”Genetics,20, 70–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Belling, J. (1927). “Configurations of bivalents ofHyacinthus with regard to segmental interchange.”Biol. Bull. Wood’s Hole,52, 480–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergner, A. D., Satina, S. &Blakeslee, A. F. (1933). “Prime types inDatura.”Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,19, 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blakeslee, A. F. (1929). “Cryptic types inDatura.”J. Hered.20, 177–90.Google Scholar
  5. —— (1932). “The species problem inDatura.”Proc. Int. Cong. Genet. 1, 104–20.Google Scholar
  6. Brink, R. A. &Burnham, C. R. (1929). “Inheritance of semi-sterility in maize.”Amer. Nat.63, 301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brink, R. A. &Cooper, D. C. (1935). “A proof that crossing over involves an exchange of segments between homologous chromosomes.”Genetics,20, 22–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham, C. R. (1930). “Genetical and cytological studies of semisterility and related phenomena in maize.”Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,16, 269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Catcheside, D. G. (1932). “The chromosomes of a new haploidOenothera.”Cytologia, Tokyo,4, 68–113.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, A. E. &Anderson, E. G. (1935). “A chromosomal interchange in maize without ring formation.”Amer. J. Bot.22, 711–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleland, R. E. (1929). “Chromosome behaviour in the pollen mother-cells of several strains ofOenothera Lamarckiana.”Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre,51, 126–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dark, S. O. S. (1936). “Meiosis in diploid and tetraploidPaeonia species.”J. Genet.32, 353–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darlington, C. D. (1929). “Chromosome behaviour and structural hybridity in the Tradescantiae.”J. Genet.21, 207–86.Google Scholar
  14. —— (1931). “The cytological theory of inheritance inOenothera.”J. Genet. 24, 405–74.Google Scholar
  15. —— (1932). “The behavior of interchange heterozygotism inOenothera.”Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,19, 101–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. —— (1934). “The origin and behaviour of chiasmata. VII.Zea Mays.”Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre,67, 96–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. —— (1936a). “The limitation of crossing-over inOenothera.”J. Genet. 32, 343–52.Google Scholar
  18. —— (1936b). “The external mechanics of the chromosomes. I–V.”Proc. roy. Soc. B,121, 264–319.Google Scholar
  19. —— (1936c). “Crossing-over and its mechanical relationships inChorthippus andStauroderus.”J. Genet. 33, 465–500.Google Scholar
  20. -- (1937).Recent Advances in Cytology, 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
  21. Darlington, C. D. &Thomas, P. T. (1937). “The breakdown of cell-division in aFestuca-Lolium derivative.”Ann. Bot., Lond. (in the Press).Google Scholar
  22. Ford, C. E. (1936). “Non-disjunctional inOenothera and the genesis of trisomics.”J. Genet.33, 275–303.Google Scholar
  23. Gairdner, A. E. (1926). “Campanula persicifolia and its tetraploid form, ‘Telham Beauty’.”J. Genet.16, 341–51.Google Scholar
  24. Gairdner, A. E. &Darlington, C. D. (1931). “Ring formation in diploid and polyploidCampanula persicifolia.”Genetica,13, 113–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammarlund, C. &Håkansson, A. (1930). “Parallelism of chromosome ring formation, sterility and linkage inPisum.”Hereditas, Lond.,14, 97, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koller, P. C. (1935). “Structural hybridity inDrosophila pseudo-obscura.”J. Genet.32, 79–102.Google Scholar
  27. Renner, O. (1916). “Die tauben Samen desOenotheren.”Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges.34, 858–69.Google Scholar
  28. Richardson, M. M. (1936). “Structural hybridity inLilium Martagon Album × L. Hansonii.”J. Genet.32, 411–50.Google Scholar
  29. Sansome, E. R. (1932). “Segmental interchange inPisum sativum.”Cytologia, Tokyo,3, 200–19.Google Scholar
  30. —— (1933). “Segmental interchange inPisum sativum. II.”Cytologia, Tokyo,5, 15–30.Google Scholar
  31. —— (1937). “Segmental interchange lines inPisum sativum.”Nature, Lond.,139, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Straub, J. (1936). “Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Meiosis. II.”Z. Bot.30, 1–57.Google Scholar
  33. Sutton, E. (1935). “Half-disjunction in an association of four chromosomes inPisum sativum.”Ann. Bot., Lond.,49, 689–98.Google Scholar
  34. Sweet, E. D. (1937). “Chiasmata, crossing-over and mutation inOenothera hybrids.”J. Genet. (in the Press).Google Scholar
  35. Upcott, M. B. (1937). “The genetic structure ofTulipa. II.”J. Genet.34, 339–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1937

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. D. Darlington
    • 1
  • A. E. Gairdner
    • 1
  1. 1.John Innes Horticultural InstitutionMerton

Personalised recommendations