Journal of Genetics

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 115–125 | Cite as

The mechanism of non-disjunction in theClB stock ofDrosophila melanogaster

  • S. Gershenson


1.XXY females heterozygous for theClB chromosome give among their offspring about 35 per cent. of secondary exceptions. The percentage of secondary exceptions is equal in the male and female offspring. TheY-chromosome disjoins from theClB chromosome and from the normalX-chromosome with equal frequency.

2. InClB females crossing-over between theX-chromosomes is greatly inhibited. The percentage of cross-overX-chromosomes carried by the gametes ofXX-ClB females is equal to that ofXXY-ClB females, indicating the correctness of Anderson’s conception of the mechanism of secondary non-disjunction.

3.XX-ClB females give among their offspring about 0·35 per cent. of primary exceptions. The comparison of the number of non-cross-overX-chromosomes produced by such females, with the frequency of non-disjunction in their offspring shows that the mechanism of chromosome disjunction in the male and femaleDrosophila is essentially similar, and speaks against Darlington’s views concerning the relation between crossing-over and the disjunction of chromosomes.


Spindle Fibre Inverted Region Percentage Percentage Percentage Primary Exception Chromosome Disjunction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, E. G. (1929). “Studies on a case of high non-disjunction inDrosophila melanogaster.”Zeit. ind. Abst. Vererb. 51, 397–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bridges, C. B. (1916). “Non-disjunction as proof of the chromosome theory of heredity.”Genetics,1, 1–52, 107–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridges, C. B. andAnderson, E. G. (1925). “Crossing-over in theX-chromosomes of triploid females ofDrosophila melanogaster.” Ibid.10, 418–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Darlington, C. D. (1931). “Meiosis.”Biol. Rev. 6, 221–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. —— (1932).Recent Advances in Cytology. London: J. and A. Churchill. Pp. xviii+559.Google Scholar
  6. —— (1934). “Anomalous chromosome pairing in the male ofDrosophila pseudo-obscura.”Genetics,16, 95–118.Google Scholar
  7. Dobzhansky, Th. (1933). “Studies on chromosome conjugation. II. The relation between crossing-over and disjunction of chromosomes.”Zeit. ind. Abst. Vererb. 64, 269–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Muller, H. J. (1928). “The measurement of gene mutation rate inDrosophila, its high variability, and its dependence upon temperature.”Genetics,13, 279–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Muller, H. J. andPainter, T. S. (1932). “The differentiation of the sex chromosomes ofDrosophila into genetically active and inert regions.”Zeit. ind. Abst. Vererb. 62, 316–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Muller, H. J. andStone, W. (1930). “Analysis of several induced gene-rearrangements involving theX-chromosome ofDrosophila.”Anat. Rec. 47.Google Scholar
  11. Painter, T. S. (1933). “A new method for the study of chromosome rearrangements and the plotting of chromosome maps.”Science,78, 647–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rhoades, M. M. (1931). “The frequencies of homozygosis of factors in attached-X females ofDrosophila melanogaster.”Genetics,16, 375–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Stern, C. (1929). “Untersuchungen über Aberrationen desY-chromosomes vonDrosophila melanogaster.”Zeit. ind. Abst. Vererb. 51, 253–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1935

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Gershenson
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoological InstituteMoscow State UniversityU.S.S.R.

Personalised recommendations