Resolving service quality uncertainty through word-of-mouth communication
- 116 Downloads
Abstract
People use various information sources to resolve service quality uncertainty. This paper focuses on word-of-mouth communication among mothers. We conduct a survey of mothers with children in kindergarten to determine whether they use information from their friends on the choice of kindergartens and children’s clinics. We identify the factors that influence mothers’ word-of-mouth communication. We find that younger and wealthier mothers use information from friends more frequently for the choice of children’s clinics. We also examine whether the behavior of mothers is influenced by the communication skills of other mothers in the classroom. We do not find network externalities in mothers’ word-of-mouth communication.
Keywords
Network externalities Quality uncertainty Word-of-mouth communicationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Evans, W. N., Oates, W. E., Schwab, Robert, M.: Measuring peer group effects: a study of teenage behavior. Journal of Political Economy. 100(5), 966–991, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Glaeser, E. L., Sacerdote, B., Scheinkman, J. A.: Crime and social interactions. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 111(2), 507–548, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Topa, G.: Social interactions, local spillovers and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies. 68(2), 261–295, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Miguel, E., Gertler, P., Levine, D. I.: Does social capital promote industrialization?: evidence from a rapid industrializer. Review of Economics and Statistics. 87(4), 754–762, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Angrist, J. D., Lang, K.: Does school integration generate peer effects?: evidence from Boston’s Metco program. American Economic Review. 94(5), 1613–1634, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hoxby, C.: Peer effects in the classroom: learning from gender and race variation. NBER Working Paper. 7867, 2000Google Scholar
- 7.Sacerdote, B.: Peer effects with random assignment: results for Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 116(2), 681–704, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Zimmerman, D. J.: Peer effects in academic outcomes: evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics. 85(1), 9–23, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Winston, G. C., Zimmerman, D. J.: Peer effects in higher education. NBER Working Paper. 9501, 2003Google Scholar
- 10.Arcidiacono, P., Nicholson, S.: Peer effects in medical school. Journal of Public Economics. 89(2–3), 327–350, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Narayan, D., Pritchett, L.: Cents and sociability: household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 47(4), 871–897, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Fafchamps, M., Minten, B.: Social capital and agricultural trade. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 83(3), 680–685, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fafchamps, M., Minten, B.: Returns to social network capital among traders. Oxford Economic Papers. 54(2), 173–206, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Manski, C. F.: Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 14(3), 118–136, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar