Advertisement

Phytoparasitica

, 32:507 | Cite as

Management strategies of mealybug pests of citrus in mediterranean countries

  • José Carlos Franco
  • Pompeo Suma
  • Elsa Borges da Silva
  • Daniel Blumberg
  • Zvi Mendel
Entomology

Abstract

Six mealybug species have been reported as citrus pests in the Mediterranean Basin: the citrus mealybugPlanococcus citri (Risso), the citriculus mealybugPseudococcus cryptus Hempel, the longtailed mealybugPseudococcus longispinus (Targioni-Tozzetti), the citrophilus mealybugPseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell), the obscure mealybugPseudococcus viburni (Signoret) and the spherical mealybugNipaecoccus viridis (Newstead). Some of these species,e.g. N. viridis, have recently been introduced into the region and are still spreading. Mealybugs are usually occasional or minor pests of citrus, but some species can reach key pest status. Mealybug management strategies in citrus have been based mostly on classical biological control and, to a lesser extent, on augmentative releases. However, chemical control is widely used, mainly because of the poor adaptation of the principal natural enemies to the climatic conditions of the Mediterranean. The application of pheromones is still restricted to monitoring the citrus mealybug, whose sex pheromone is commercially available. Mass trapping and mating disruption should be considered for possible use in IPM programs as an alternative method to supplementary chemical treatments. Enhancement of biological control through management of ant populations is another promising tactic for control of mealybugs. Strategies for managing mealybug pests of citrus, and possible levels of integration of different tactics according to the pest status, are discussed.

Key words

Mealybugs Pseudococcidae IPM biological control Mediterranean region 

References

  1. 1.
    Arai, T., Sugie, H., Hiradate, S., Quwahara, S., Itagaki, N. and Nakahata, T. (2003) Identification of a sex pheromone component ofPseudococcus cryptus.J. Chem. Ecol. 29:2213–2223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbagallo, S., Rapisarda, C., Siscaro, G. and Longo, S. (1994) Status of the biological control against citrus whiteflies and scale insects in Italy.in: Tribulato, E., Gentile, A. and Reforgiato, G. [Eds.]Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture (Acireale, Italy, 1992), pp. 1216–1220.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartlett, B.R. (1957) Biotic factors in natural control of citrus mealybugs in California.J. Econ. Entomol. 50:753–755.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartlett, B.R. (1978) Pseudococcidae.in: Clausen C.P. [Ed.] Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review.U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 480:137–170.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bar-Zakay, I., Peleg, B.A. and Chen, C. (1989) The spherical mealybug infesting citrus in Israel.in: Goren, R. and Mendel, K. [Eds.]Citriculture, Proc. 6th Int. Citrus Congress (Tel Aviv, Israel), pp. 1083–1087.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bedford, E.C.G. (1997) Problems which we face in bringing red scale,Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell), under biological control in citrus in South Africa.in: Manicom, B., Robinson, J., du Plessis, S.T., Joubert, P., van Zyl, J.L. and du Preez, S. [Eds.]Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture (Sun City, RSA, 1996), pp. 485–492.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bellows, T.S., Morse, J.G., Hadjidemetriou, D.G. and Iwata, Y. (1985) Residual toxicity of four insecticides used for control of citrus thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on three beneficial species in a citrus agroecosystem.J. Econ. Entomol. 78:681–686.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ben-Dov, Y. (1994) A Systematic Catalogue of the Mealybugs of the World (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae), with Data on Geographical Distribution, Host Plants, Biology and Economic Importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, UK.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berlinger, M. and Gol’berg, A.M. (1978) The effect of fruit sepals on the citrus mealybug populations and on its parasite.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24:238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berryman, A.A. (1987) The theory and classification of outbreaks.in: Barbosa, P. and Schultz, J.C. [Eds.] Insect Outbreaks. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bierl-Leonhardt, B.A., Moreno, D.S., Schwarz, M., Fargerlund, J. and Plimmer, J.R. (1981) Isolation, identification and synthesis of the pheromone of the citrus mealybug,Planococcus citri (Risso).Tetrahedron Lett. 22:389–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blumberg, D. (1997) Parasitoid encapsulation as a defence mechanism in the Coccoidea (Homoptera) and its importance in biological control.Biol. Control 8:225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blumberg, D., Ben-Dov, Y. and Mendel, Z. (1999) The citriculus mealybug,Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel, and its natural enemies in Israel: history and present situation.Entomologica 33:141–152.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blumberg, D., Franco, J.C., Suma, P., Russo, A. and Mendel, Z. (2001) Parasitoid encapsulation in mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) as affected by the host parasitoid association and superparasitism.Boll. Zool. Agrar. Bachic. 33:385–395.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blumberg, D., Klein, M. and Mendel, Z. (1995) Response by encapsulation of four mealybug species (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) to parasitization byAnagyrus pseudococci.Phytoparasitica 23:157–163.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blumberg, D. and Van Driesche, R.G. (2001) Encapsulation rates of three encyrtid parasitoids by three mealybug species (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) found commonly as pests in commercial greenhouses.Biol. Control 22:191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bodenheimer, F.S. (1951) Citrus Entomology in the Middle East. Dr. W. Junk, the Hague, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Browning, H.W. (1994) Early classical biological control in citrus.in: Rosen, D., Benett, F.D. and Capinera, J.L. [Eds.] Pest Management in the Subtropics: Biological Control, A Florida Perspective. Intercept Limited, Andover, UK. pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brun, P. (1994) Integrated pest control in Corsican citrus orchards.in: Tribulato, E., Gentile, A. and Reforgiato, G. [Eds.]Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture (Acireale, Italy, 1992), pp. 968–970.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bustan, A., Goldschmidt, E.E. and Erner, Y. (1996) Carbohydrate supply and demand during fruit development in relation to productivity of grapefruit and “Murcott” mandarin.Acta Hortic. 416:81–87.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cavaco, M., Soares, C., Monteiro C., Gonçalves, M. and Fernandes, J.E. (2002) Integrated pest management of citrus crops.Proc. National Congress of Citriculture (Faro, Portugal, 2000), pp. 97–104 (Portuguese, with English summary).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cavalloro, R. and Prota, R. (1983) Integrated Control in Citrus Orchards: Sampling Methodology and Threshold for Intervention against the Principal Phytophagous Pests.Proc. E.C.-Expert’s Meeting “Integrated Control in Citrus: Comparison of Results Achieved by Applying a Standardized Methodology” (Siniscola-Muravera, Italy, 1982).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clausen, C.P. (1915) Mealybugs of citrus trees.Bull. Univ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. 258:19–48.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cole, F.R. (1933) Natural control of the citrus mealybug.J. Econ. Entomol. 26:855–864.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Compere, H. (1939) Mealybugs and their natural enemies in South America.Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 7:57–73.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Copland, M.W., Tingle, C.C.D. and Heidari, M. (1993) Influence of host plant on the biocontrol of glasshouse mealybug.in: Wardlow, L.R. and van Lenteren, J.C. [Eds.] Biological Pest Control: The Glasshouse Experience. Blandford Press, Dorset, UK. pp. 82–90.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Davies, F.S. and Albrigo, L.G. (1994) Citrus. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    DeBach, P. and Bartlett, B. (1951) Effects of insecticides on biological control of insect pests of citrus.J. Econ. Entomol. 44:372–383.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dreishpun, Y. (2000) A Guide to the Control of Citrus Pests. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Bet Dagan, Israel. Publ. No. 17003.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Flanders, S.E. (1951) Citrus mealybug, four new parasites studied in biological control experiments.Calif. Agric. 5:11.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Flint, M.L. [Ed.] (1991) Integrated Pest Management for Citrus.Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. no. 3303.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Franco, J.C. (1994) Citrus phenology as a basis to study the population dynamics of the citrus complex in Portugal.in: Tribulato. E., Gentile, A. and Reforgiato, G. [Eds.]Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture (Acireale, Italy, 1992), pp. 929–930.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Franco, J.C., Gross, S., Silva, E.B., Dunkelblum, E. and Mendel, Z. (2002) Some basic ideas for the management of the citrus mealybug by mass trapping of males.in: Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals in Integrated Production.Abstr. Meeting of IOBC WRPS Working Group (Erice, Italy, 2002), p. 24.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Franco, J.C. and Marotta, S.A. (1999) A survey of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) in citrus groves in continental Portugal.Entomologica 33:191–196.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Franco, J.C., Silva, E.B. and Carvalho, J.P. (2000) [Mealybugs (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) Associated with Citrus in Portugal.] ISA Press, Lisbon, Portugal (special publication, in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Franz, J.M., Bogenschütz, H., Hassan, S.A., Huang, P., Naton, E., Suter, H.et al. (1980) Results of a joint pesticide test programme by the working group: pesticides and beneficial arthropods.Entomophaga 25:231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Funderburk, J., Higley, L. and Buntin, G.D. (1993) Concept and directions in arthropod pest management.Adv. Agron. 51:125–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Garrido, A. (1986) Feasibility of integrated pest management for citrus orchards in Spain.in: Cavalloro, R. and Martino, E.D. [Eds.] Integrated Pest Control in Citrus Groves.Proc. Experts’ Meeting (Acireale, Italy, 1985), pp. 549–556.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Garrido, A. and Ventura, J.J. (1993) Plagas de los Citricos: Bases Para el Manejo Integrado. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentacion, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grafton-Cardwell, E.E., Morse, J.G., O’Connell, N.V. and Phillips, P.A. (1997) Citrus: insects, mites, and snails.in: Flint, M.L. [Ed.] UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines. Univ. of California, Davis, CA, USA. pp. B.1-B.72.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gross, S., Blumberg, D., Drishpon, Y. and Mendel, Z. (2001) The spherical mealybug,Nipaecoccus viridis: new data on its distribution, damage, natural enemies and control.Phytoparasitica 29:62 (abstr.).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gross, S., Dreishpoun, Y., Blachinski, D., Steinberg, S. and Mendel, Z. (1999) Cork scars on fruits of the citrus variety Sweetie Oroblanco as related to infestation by the citrus mealybug.Alon Hanotea 53:463–468 (Hebrew, with English summary).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gross, S., Dunkelblum, E., Assael, F., Harel, M., Zada, A. and Mendel, Z. (2001) Characterization of the performance of pheromone traps as a basis for the management of the citrus mealybug in citrus groves.Boll. Zool. Agrar. Bachic. 33:283–295.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gross, S. and Mendel, Z. (2004) Characterization of citrus varieties susceptible to the citrus mealybug in Israel.Alon Hanotea 58(8): (in press) (Hebrew, with English summary).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Haney, P.B. (1989) Identification, ecology and control of the ants in citrus: a world survey.in: Goren, R. and Mendel, K. [Eds.]Citriculture, Proc. 6th Int. Citrus Congr. (Tel Aviv, Israel), pp. 1227–1251.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hardin, M.R., Benrey, B., Coll, M., Lamp, W.O., Roderick, G.K. and Barbosa, P. (1995) Arthropod pest resurgence: an overview of potential mechanisms.Crop Prot. 14:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hassan, S.A., Bigler, F., Bogenschütz, H., Brown, J.U., Firth, S.I., Huang, P.et al. Results of the second joint pesticide testing programme by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group on Pesticides and Beneficial Arthropods.Z. Angew. Entomol. 95:151–158.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hatting, V. and Tate, B. (1995) Effects of field-weathered residues of insect growth regulators on some Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) of economic importance as biocontrol agents.Bull. Entomol. Res. 85:489–493.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hatting, V. and Tate, B.A. (1997) The effects of insect growth regulator use on IPM in Southern African citrus.in: Manicom, B., Robinson, J., du Plessis, S.T., Joubert, P., van Zyl, J.L. and du Preez, S. [Eds.]Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture (Sun City, RSA, 1996), pp. 523–525.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hatting, V. and Tate, B.A (1997) The pest status of mealybugs on citrus in Southern Africa.in: Manicom, B., Robinson, J., du Plessis, S.T., Joubert, P., van Zyl, J.L. and du Preez, S. [Eds.]Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture (Sun City, RSA, 1996), pp. 560–563.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hefetz, A. and Tauber, O. (1990) Male response to the synthetic sex pheromone ofPlanococcus citri (Risso) (Hom., Pseudococcidae) and its application for population monitoring.J. Appl. Entomol. 109:502–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Howse, P.E., Stevens, I.D.R. and Jones, O.T. (1998) Insect Pheromones and Their Use in Pest Management. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hwang, J.S. and Chu, Y.I. (1987). The development of sex pheromone traps for the citrus mealybug,Planococcus citri (Risso).Plant Prot. Bull. Taiwan 29:297–305.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ishaaya, I. and Degheele, D. (1998) Insecticides with Novel Mode of Action. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Katsoyannos, P. (1996) Integrated Insect Pest Management for Citrus in Northern Mediterranean Countries. Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Krishnamoorthy, A. (1990) Evaluation of permanent establishment ofLeptomastix dactylopii How. againstPlanococcus citri (Risso) in citrus orchards in India.Fruits 45:29–32.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Landis, D.A., Wratten, S.D. and Gurr, G.M. (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45:175–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Longo, S. and Benfatto, D. (1987) Coleotteri entomofagi presenti sugli agrumi in Italia.Inf. Fitopatol. 37:21–30.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Longo, S., Mazzeo, G. and Russo, A. (1994) The scale insects of ornamental plants of southern Italy.Inf. Fitopatol. 44:15–28 (Italian, with English summary).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Longo, S. and Russo, A. (1986) Distribution and density of scale insects (Homoptera, Coccoidea) on citrusgroves in Eastern Sicily and Calabria.in: Cavalloro, R. and Di Martino, E. [Eds.] Integrated Pest Control in Citrus-Groves.Proc. Experts Meeting (Acireale, Italy, 1985), pp. 41–49.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mazzone, P., Tranfaglia, A. and Viggiani, G. (1980) Effect of pesticides on the parasitoidLeptomastix dactylopii (How.) (Hym. Encyrtidae).Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. Filippo Silvestri 37:13–15 (Italian, with English summary).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mazzone, P. and Viggiani, G. (1988) Side effects of pesticides on beneficial insects.Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. Filippo Silvestri 45:59–66 (Italian, with English summary).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mendel, Z., Blumberg, D. and Ishaaya, I. (1994) Effects of some insect growth regulators on natural enemies of scale insects (Hom.: Coccoidea).Entomophaga 39:199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mendel, Z., Gross, S., Blumberg, D. and Steinberg, S. (1995) [Improvement of the biological control of mealybugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) by inundative releases of natural enemies.]Hassadeh 72:485–486 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mendel, Z., Gross, S., Steinberg, S., Cohen, M. and Blumberg, D. (1999) Trials for the control of the citrus mealybug in citrus orchards by augmentative release of two encyrtid parasitoids.Entomologica 33:251–265.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Meyerdirk, D.E., French, J.V., Hart, W.G. and Chandler, L.D. (1979) Citrus mealybug: effect of pesticide residues on adults of the natural enemy complex.J. Econ. Entomol. 72:893–895.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Miller, D.R., Miller, G.L. and Watson, G.W. (2002) Invasive species of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and their threat to U.S. agriculture.Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 104:825–836.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Moreno, D.S., Haney, P.B. and Luck, R.F. (1987) Chlorpyrifos and diazinon as barriers to Argentine art (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) foraging on citrus trees.J. Econ. Entomol. 80:208–214.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Morse, J.G. and Bellows, T.S. (1986) Toxicity of major citrus pesticides toAphytis melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) andCryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 79:311–314.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Morse, J.G., Bellows, T.S., Gaston, L.K. and Iwata, Y. (1987) Residual toxicity of acaricides to three beneficial species on California citrus.J. Econ. Entomol. 80:953–960.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ortu, S. and Delrio, G. (1982) Observations on the field use of the synthetic sex pheromone ofPlanococcus citri (Risso) (Homoptera, Coccoidea).Redia 65:341–353.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Panis, A. (1977) Mealybugs (Homoptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae) and the integrated pest management of citrus crops in the Mediterranean Basin.Bol. Serv. Plagas 3:139–145 (Spanish, with English summary).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Panis, A. (1981) Note on some auxiliary insects regulating populations of Pseudococcidae and Coccidae (Homoptera, Coccoidea) on citrus in eastern Provence.Fruits 36:49–52 (French, with English abstract).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Pedigo, L.P. (1996) Entomology and Pest Management. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Peleg, B.A. and Bar-Zakay, I. (1995) The pest status of citrus scale insects in Israel (1984–1994).Isr. J. Entomol. 29:261–264.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Prakasan, C.B. and Bhat, P.K. (1985) Interference of the predator,Cryptolaemus montrouzieri with the performance of a newly introduced parasite,Leptomastix dactylopii.J. Coffee Res. 15:29–32.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Reddy, K.B., Bhat, P.K. and Prakasan, C.B. (1991) Toxicity of certain insecticides and fungicides toLeptomastix dactylopii: an introduced parasitoid ofPlancoccus citri.J. Plant Crops 18 (suppl.):281–284.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ripolles, J.L. (1992) Efectos secundarios de varios reguladores de crecimiento de insectos sobreCryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls.Phytoma Esp. 40:121–124.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ripolles, J.L., Marsa, M. and Martinez, M. (1994) Desarrollo de un programa de control integrado de las plagas de los cítrico en las comarcas del Baix Ebre i Montsià (Tarragona). IRTA/Estació Experimental de l’Ebre, Amposta, SpainGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Rosen, D. (1974) Current status of integrated control of citrus pests in Israel.Bull. OEPP 4:363–368.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Rotundo, G. and Tremblay, E. (1982) Preliminary report on the attractivity of synthetic pheromone ofPlanococcus citri (Risso) (Homoptera, Coccoidea) in comparison to virgin females.Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. Filippo Silvestri 36:266–274.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Russell, J.M., Campbell, B.C. and Dreyer, D.L. (1990) Honeydew analysis for detecting phloem transport of plant natural products. Implementations for host-plant resistance to sap-sucking insects.J. Chem. Ecol. 16:1899–1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Samways, M.J., Nel, M. and Prins, A.J. (1982) Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) foraging in citrus trees and attending honey-producing Homoptera.Phytophylactica 14:155–157.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Shaaraf, N.S. and Meyerdrik, D.E. (1987) A review on the biology, ecology and control ofNipaecoccus viridis (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae).Misc. Publ. Entomol. Soc. Am. 66:1–18.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Silva, E.B. and Mexia, A. (1997) The damage caused byPlanococcus citri (Risso) on citrus groves.in: Vacante, V. [Ed.] Proc. Meeting Working Group on Integrated Control in Citrus Fruit Crops,XX Int. Congr. Entomology (Firenze, Italy, 1996).IOBC WPRS Bull. 20:26–31.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Silva, E.B. and Mexia, A. (1999) The pest complexCryptoblabes gnidiella (Millière) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) andPlanococcus citri (Risso) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on sweet orange groves (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) in Portugal: interspecific association.Bol. San. Veg. Plagas 25:89–98.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Smith, D., Beattie, G.A.C. and Broadly, R. (1997) Citrus Pests and Their Natural Enemies: Integrated Pest Management in Australia. Queensland DPI & HRDC, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Smith, D., Papacek, D.F. and Murray, D.A.H. (1988) The use ofLeptomastix dactylopii Howard (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) to controlPlanococcus citri (Risso) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Queensland citrus orchards.Old. J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 45:157–164.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Smith, H.S. and Armitage, H.M. (1931) The Biological Control of Mealybugs Attacking Citrus.Bull. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. 509.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Spicciarelli, R., Battaglia, D. and Tranfaglia, A. (1994) Biological control ofPlanococcus citri (Risso) byLeptomastix dactylopii Howard in citrus groves in Metapontum area.Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture (Acireale, Italy, 1992), pp. 966–967.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Swirski, E. (1985) Integrated control of arthropods of subtropical fruit trees in the Mediterranean Region.Atti XIV Congr. Naz. Ital. Entomology (Palermo, Italy), pp. 781–799.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tonkyn, D.W. and Whitcom, R.F. (1987) Feeding strategies and the guild concept among vascular feeding insects and microorganisms.in: Haris, K.F. [Ed.] Current Topics in Vector Research. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. pp. 179–199.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Tumminelli, R., Saraceno, F., Conti, F., Raciti, E. and Scillaro, E. (1997) Impact of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on some citrus pests in Eastern Sicily.in: Manocom, B., Robinsin, J., Plessis, S.T., Joubert, P., van Zyl, J.L. and Preez, S. [Eds.]Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture (Sun City, RSA, 1966), pp. 642–648.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Vacante, V. (1988) La lotta guidata in agrumicoltura.Inf. Fitopatol. 38:17–32 (Italian, with English abstract).Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Viggiani, G. (1980) Progress toward the integrated control of citrus pests in Italy.Proc. Int. Symp. IOBC/WPRS Integrated Control Agric. Forestry (Vienna, Austria, 1979), pp. 293–229.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Viggiani, G., Castronuovo, N. and Borrelli, C. (1973) Secondary effects of 40 pesticides onLeptomastidea abnormis Grlt. (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae) andScymnus includens Kirsch (Coleoptera Coccinellidae), important natural enemies ofPlanococcus citri (Risso).Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. Filippo Silvestri 30:88–103 (Italian, with English abstract).Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Viggiani, G. and Tranfaglia, A. (1978) A method for laboratory test of side-effects of pesticides onLeptomastix dactylopii (How.) (Hym. Encyrtidae).Bol. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. Filippo Silvestri 35:8–15.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Way, M.J. (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8:307–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Way, M.J., Paiva, M.R. and Cammell, M.E. (1999) Natural biological control of the pine processionary mothThaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. and Schiff.) by the Argentine antLinepithema humile (Mayr) in Portugal.Agric. For. Entomol. 1:27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Williams, D.J. and Willink, M.C.G. (1992) Mealybugs of Central and South America. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Yang, J. and Sadof, C.S. (1995) Variegation inColeus blumei and life history of citrus mealybug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae).Environ. Entomol. 24:1650–1655.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Franco, J.C., Russo, A., Suma, P., Silva, E.B., Dunkelblum, E. and Mendel, Z. (2001) Monitoring strategies for the citrus mealybug in citrus groves.Boll. Zool. Agrar. Bachic. 33:297–303.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Carlos Franco
    • 1
  • Pompeo Suma
    • 2
  • Elsa Borges da Silva
    • 1
  • Daniel Blumberg
    • 3
  • Zvi Mendel
    • 3
  1. 1.Dpto. de Protecção das Plantas e de FitoecologiaInstituto Superior de AgronomiaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Dipto. di Scienze e Tecnologie Fitosanitariesez. Entomologia AgrariaCataniaItaly
  3. 3.Dept. of EntomologyARO, The Volcani CenterBet DaganIsrael

Personalised recommendations