Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards

  • Jeroen B. Guinee
Book Review: The Second Dutch LCA-Guide, published as book

References

  1. [1]
    Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lamkreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1992): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Guide (Part 1) and Backgrounds (Part 2), prepared by CML, TNO and B&G. Leiden October 1992. English Version 1993Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) (1993): Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’. From the SETAC Work-shop held at Sesimbra, Portugal, 31 March-3 April 1993. Edition 1, Brussels and Pensacola (Florida)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    International Standard Organization (ISO) (1997): Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. ISO 14040, June 1997Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Habersatter K, Widmer F (1991): Oekobilanzen von Packstoffen. Stand 1990. In: Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), Bern (Hrsg): Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr 132Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Guinée J (2001): Handbook on Life Ccyle Assessment — Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Editorial in Int J LCA 6 (5) 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Marsmann M (2000): The ISO 14040 Family. Editorial in Int J LCA 5 (6) 317–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Klüppel H-J (2002): The ISO Standardization Process: Quo Vadis? Editorial in Int J LCA 7(1) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich EG, Hofstetter P, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer EW, Mueller-Wenk R, Olson SI, Pennington DW, Potting J, Steen B (eds) (2002): Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving Towards Best Practice. ISBN 1 -880611—54-6. SETAC Press, Pensacola (Florida, USA)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Töpfer K (2002): The Launch of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Editorial in Int J LCA 7 (4) 191 and following papers in this issueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Frische R, Klöpffer W, Esser G, Schönborn W (1982): Criteria for Assessing the Environmental Behavior of Chemicals: Selection and Preliminary Quantification. Ecotox Environ Safety 6 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Klöpffer W (1997): In Defense of the Cumulative Energy Demand. Editorial in No 2, Int J LCA 2 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Frischknecht R (1997): The Seductive Effect of Identical Physical Units. Int J LCA 2, 125–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Frischknecht R, Heijungs R, Hofstetter P (1998): Einstein’s Lessons for Energy Accounting in LCA. Int J LCA 3 266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Eganhouse RP, Pontolillo J (2002): Assessing the Reliability of Physico-Chemical Property Data (Kow Sw) for Hydrophobic Organic Compounds: DDT and DDE as a Case Study. SETAC Globe 3 (4) 34–35Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Barnthouse L, Fava J, Humphreys K, Hunt R, Laibson L, Noesen S, Norris G, Owens J, Todd J, Vigon B, Weitz K, Young J (eds) (1998): Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: The State-of-the-Art. Report of the SETAC Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) Impact Assessment Workgroup. 2nd edition. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Pensacola, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeroen B. Guinee
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre of Environmental ScienceLeiden UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations