Data quality and uncertainty in LCI

  • Remi Coulon
  • Vincent Camobreco
  • Helene Teulon
  • Jacques Besnainou
LCA Methodology


It has recently been acknowledged that the quality of data used in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is one of the most important limiting factors to the application of the methodology. Early approaches dealing with this problem solely based on Data Quality Indicators (DQI) have revealed their limitations, and stochastic models are increasingly proposed as an alternative. Although facing methodological and practical difficulties, for instance the characterization of the distribution of input data, these stochastic models can significantly enhance decision-making in LCA. Uncertainty and data quality, however, are two distinct attributes. No matter how sophisticated the stochastic models are, they do not address the issue of the adequacy of the data used with regard to the goal of the study. Actual data on the distribution of SO emissions for US coal fired power plants for instance, would be of low quality for a European study. It is therefore believed that mixed approaches DQI/stochastic models should be developed in the future.


Data Quality Indicators (DQI) data quality, LCA decision-making in LCA DQI stochastic models LCA Life Cycle Assessment quality of data LCA stochastic models uncertainty data quality 


  1. [1]
    Life Cycle Assessment Daw Quality: A Conceptual Framework. 1994. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 1994. Pensncola, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Guidelines for Assessing the Quality of Life Cycle Inventory Data. 1995. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/ 530- R-95-010Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis. March 5, 1997. Draft International Standard 14041. International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Risk Policy Report—February 21, 1997, Vol. 3 N. 2 p 6Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kennedy, D.J. et al: Stochastic Environmental Life Cycle Assessment Modeling. 1996. Int. J. LCA 1 (4) 199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Besnainou, J. and Coulon, R.: Uncertainty, Complexity and Decision in LCA. Proceedings of the second international conference on EcoBalance. Nov. 18-20, 1996. Tsukuba, JapanGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Weidema, B.P. and Wesnoes, M.S.: Data Quality Management for Life Cycle Inventories—An Example of Using Data Quality Indicators. Presented at the 1995 SETAC World CongressGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Norris, G.A.: Picking Winners and Telling Alternatives Apart: Practicing LCIA Decision Making in the Presence of Uncertainty. June 1996. 89th Annual Meeting Air & Waste Management AssociationGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J.R.: Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Kluvver Academic Publishers, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Remi Coulon
    • 1
  • Vincent Camobreco
    • 1
  • Helene Teulon
    • 1
  • Jacques Besnainou
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecobalance, Inc.MarylandUSA

Personalised recommendations