Advertisement

The virtual eco-costs ‘99 A single LCA-based indicator for sustainability and the eco-costs-value ratio (EVR) model for economic allocation

A new LCA-based calculation model to determine the sustainability of products and services
  • Joost G. Vogtländer
  • Han C. Brezet
  • Charles F. Hendriks
LCA Methodology

Abstract

In literature, many models (qualitatively as well as quantitatively) can be found to cope with the problem of communicating results of LCA analyses with decision takers. In a previous article of this Journal, an LCA-based single indicator for emissions is proposed: the ‘virtual pollution prevention costs ‘99’ (Vogtländer et al. 2000a).

In this article, a single LCA-based indicator for sustainability is proposed. It builds on the virtual pollution prevention costs ‘99 for emissions, and adds the other two main aspects of sustainability: material depletion and energy consumption. This single indicator, the ‘virtual eco-costs ‘99’, is the sum of the marginal prevention costs of:
  • Material depletion, applying ‘material depletion costs’, to be reduced by recycling

  • Energy consumption, applying ‘eco-costs of energy’ being the price of renewable energy

  • Toxic emissions, applying the ‘virtual pollution prevention costs ‘99’

The calculation model includes ‘direct’ as well as ‘indirect’ environmental impacts. The main groups of ‘indirect’ components in the life cycle of products and services are:
  • Labour (the environmental impacts of office heating, lighting, computers, commuting, etc.)

  • production assets (equipment, buildings, transport vehicles, etc.)

To overcome allocation problems of the indirect components of complex product-service systems, a methodology of economic allocation has been developed, based on the so called Eco-costs/ Value Ratio (EVR) model.

This EVR calculation model appears to be a practical and powerful tool to assess the sustainability of a product, a service, or a product-service combination.

Key words

Allocation depletion depreciation eco-costs eco-efficiency economic allocation end of life energy EVR indirect environmental impact labour LCA marginal prevention costs materials open loop recycling product-service systems single indicator sustainability recycling virtual pollution prevention costs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CBS (1996): Energiegebruik bij financiële instellingen en zakelijke dienstverlening (use of energy in the financial industry and the business service industry). Sector Energie, CBS, Voorburg, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  2. CBS (1997): Samenvattend overzicht van de industrie, 1995(summary of industrial sectors forl995). CBS, Voorburg, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  3. ECN (1998): Optiedocument voor emissiereductie van broeikasgassen (emission reduction of greenhouse gases, options for The Netherlands). Report nr. ECN-C-98-082, ECN, Petten, October 1998Google Scholar
  4. Gadiesh O, Gilbert GL (1998): Profit pools: a fresh look at strategy. How to map your industry’s profit pool, Harvard Business review, May-June 1998Google Scholar
  5. Garvin DA (1998): Managing Quality. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Gielen DJ, Lako P, Dinkelbach L, van Ree R (1998): Prospects for bioenergy in the Netherlands, a MARKAL analysis of the long term impact of energy and CO2 policies. ECN, Petten, February 1998Google Scholar
  7. Gielen DJ (1999): Materialising dematerialisation, Integrated energy and materials systems engineering for greenhouse gas emission mitigation. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, ISBN 90-5155-008-1Google Scholar
  8. Goedkoop M (1995): Eco-indicator 95. Final report, Pré Consultants, AmersfoortGoogle Scholar
  9. Porter ME (1985): Competitive advantage, Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Rombouts JP, Hennessey JM (1999): Applying classifications of materials and energy transformation to early environmental assessment of products, Proceedings of EcoDesign ’99: first international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing, February 1–3, ’99, Tokyo, Japan, ISBN 0769500072, pp. 98-111Google Scholar
  11. Vogtländer JG, Bijma A (2000a): The ‘virtual pollution prevention costs ‘99’, a single LCA-based indicator for emissions, Int. J. of LCA 5 (2) 113–124Google Scholar
  12. Vogtländer JG, Brantjes EC (2000b): The eco-costs, the costs and the EVR of road transport of consumer goods, www.io.tudelft.nl/ research/dsfGoogle Scholar
  13. VROM (1997): Emissies in Nederland, Trends, thema’s en doel-groepen 1995 en ramingen 1996, (Emissions in The Netherlands, Trends, issues and industrial sectors 1995 and estimates for 1996). Ministerie van VROM, Hoofdinspectie Milieuhygiëne/IPC 680, The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. WBCSD (1995) Second Antwerp Eco-efficiency Workshop World Business Council for Sustainable Development. See the WBCSD web site www.wbcsd.ch/eurint/eeei.htm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joost G. Vogtländer
    • 1
  • Han C. Brezet
    • 1
  • Charles F. Hendriks
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty Design Construction and Production, Section Design for SustanabilityDelft University of TechnologyGA DelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty Civil Engineering and Geoscience, Subfaculty Materials Science GroupDelft University of TechnologyGA DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations