Modelling fate for LCA

  • Anneke Wegener Sleeswijk
  • Reinout Heijungs
6th SETAC-Europe meeting: LCA — selected papers


Until now, impact assessment within LCA has mainly focussed on the substance hazard for some impacts, whereas, for other impacts, substance fate is included in the assessment as well. The main goal of this paper is to define the position of fate modelling in LCIA, and to specify the requirements for a general LCA fate model. A proposal is made to clearly distinguish an impact-category independent fate analysis from a separate exposure analysis and an impact-category related impact analysis, and to use a global multimedia model as a modelling basis. This modelling basis might be supplemented with substance-specific models for a number of substances.


Life cycle assessment characterisation impact assessment impact categories regional differentiation multimedia modelling fate modelling intermedia transport degradation 


  1. Cowan, C.E., D. Mackay, T.C. Feytei., D. van de;Meent, D. Dr. Guardo, J. Davies &N. Mackay (1995): The Multi-Media Fate Model: A Vital Tool for Predicting the Fate of Chemicals. SETAC Press, Pensacola, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Fava, J., F. Consoli, R. Denison, K. Dickson, T. Mohin &,B. Vigon (1993): A Conceptual Framework for Life-Cycle Impact Assessment. SETAC, Pensacola, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Guinée, J. &R. Heijungs (1993): A Proposal for the Classification of Toxic Substances within the Framework of Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Chemosphere 26 (10) 1925–1944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guinée, J.B., R. Heijungs, L.F.C.M. van Oers, A. Wegener Sleeswijk, D. Van De MeeNT, T. Vekmeire &M. Rikken (1996b): Inclusion of Fate in LCA Characterisation of Toxic Releases Applying USES 1.0. Int. J. LCA 1 (3) 133–138Google Scholar
  5. Hauschiild (1994): Characterization of Product Specific Toxicity in Life-Cycle Assessment. In: Udo de Haeset al. (1994), pp.75–81Google Scholar
  6. Heijungs, R. (1995): Harmonisation of Methods for Impact Assessment. Environ. Sci & Pollut. Res. 2 (4) 217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. JOlliet, O. (1994): Critical Surface-Time: an Evaluation Method for LCA. In: Udo di: Haeset al. (1994), pp.133–142Google Scholar
  8. Mackay, D. (1991): Multimedia Environmental Models. The Fugacity Approach. Lewish Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Mackay, D. &S. Paterson (1991): Evaluating the Multimedia Fate of Organic Chemicals: a Level III Fugacity Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25 (3) 427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. RIVM, VROM, WVC (1994): Uniform System for the Evaluation of Substances (USES), version 1.0. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  11. Udo de Haes, H.A., A.A. Jensen, W. Klöpffer & L.-G. Lindfors (eds.) (1994): Integrating Impact Assessment into LCA. Proceedings of the LCA Symposium held at the Fourth SETAC-Europe Congress, 11-14 April 1994. SETAC-Europe, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  12. Udo de Haes, H.A. (ed.) (1996): Towards a Methodology for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Report of the SETAC-Europe Working Group on Life Cycle Impact Assessment (WIA). ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  13. Wania, F. &D. Mackay (1995): A Global Distribution Model for Persistent Organic Chemicals. The Science of the Total Environment 160/161:211–232Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Environmental ScienceLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations