Life-Cycle based methods for sustainable product development

Editorial

Abstract

Sustainability-a term originating from silviculture, which was adopted by UNEP as the main political goal for the future development of humankind-is also the ultimate aim of product development. It comprises three components: environment, economy and social aspects which have to be properly assessed and balanced if a new product is to be designed or an existing one is to be improved. The responsibility of the researchers involved in the assessment is to provide appropriate and reliable instruments. For the environmental part there is already an internationally standardized tool: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is the logical counterpart of LCA for the economic assessment. LCC surpasses the purely economic cost calculation by taking into account hidden costs and potentially external costs over the life cycle of the product. It is a very important point that different life-cycle based methods (including Social Life Cycle Assessment) for sustainablity assessment use the same system boundaries.

Keywords

Brundtland report ecoefficiency economic life cycle assessment (LCC) environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) industrial ecology integrated product policy life cycle management (LCM) product-related life cycle assessment social life cycle assessment (SLCA) sustainability United Nations Conference of Environment and Development (UNCED) 

References

  1. [1]
    Carlowitz HC (1713/2000): Sylvicultura Oeconomica-Natur-mäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum-Zucht. Leipzig 1713 (Reprint [ISBN 3-86012-115-4]: TU, Bergakademie Freiberg, Akademische Buchhandlung Freiberg 2000)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    WCED-World Commission on Environment and Development (1987): Our Common Future. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Töpfer K (2002): The Launch of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (Prague, 28 April 2002). Editorial. Int J LCA 7 (4) 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hunt R, Franklin WE (1996): LCA-How it Came About. Personal Reflections on the Origin and the Development of LCA in the USA. Int J LCA 1 (1) 4–7Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Oberbacher B, Nikodem H, Klopffer W (1996): LCA-How it Came About. An Early Systems Analysis of Packaging for Liquids which Would be Called an LCA Today. Int J LCA 1 (2) 62–65Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Boustead I (1996): LCA-How it came About. The Beginning in UK. Int J LCA 1 (3) 147–150Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Meadows Donella H, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens III WW (1972): The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. [ISBN 0-87663-165-0]. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Fava JA et al. (Eds) (1991): SETAC Workshop Report: A Technical Framework for Life Cycle Assessments. August 18-23 1990, Smugglers Notch, Vermont (USA)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) (1993): Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’. Based on a Workshop at Sesimbra, Portugal, March 31–April 3 1993., Brussels and Pensacola, Florida (USA)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Klüppel H-J (2002): The ISO Standardization Process: Quo Vadis? Int J LCA 7 (1) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Barnthouse L. et al. (Eds) (1998): Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: The State-of-the-Art. Report of the SETAC Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) Impact Assessment Workgroup. 2nd edition. Pensacola, Florida (USA)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Klöpffer W, Grießhammer R, Sundström G (1995): Overview of the Scientific Peer Review of the European Life Cycle Inventory for Surfactant Production. Tenside Surfactants Detergents 32, 378–383Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hunt RG, Boguski TK, Weitz K, Sharma A (1998): Case Studies Examining Streamlining Techniques. Int J LCA 3 (1) 36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    White AL, Savage D, Shapiro K (1996): Life-Cycle Costing: Concepts and Application. Chapter 7. In: Curran, Mary Ann (Ed): Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment. [ISBN 0-07-015063-X] McGraw-Hill, New York, p 7.1–7.19Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Norris GA (2001): Integrating Life Cycle Cost Analysis and LCA. Int J LCA 6 (2) 118–120Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Hunkeler D, Rebitzer G (2002): Life Cycle Costing-Paving the Road to Sustainable Development? Editorial in: Gate to EHS: Life Cycle Management, March 25th, 2002. ecomed publishers (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/ehs2002.03.028)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Shapiro KG (2001): Incorporating Costs in LCA. Int J LCA 6 (2) 121–123Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    O’Brian M, Doig A, Clift R (1996): Social and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (SELCA). Int J LCA 1 (4) 231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Projektgruppe Ökologische Wirtschaft (1987): Produktlini-enanalyse (PLA). [ISBN 3-923243-27-8] Kölner Volksblatt VerlagGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Rebitzer G (2002): Integrating Life Cycle Costing and Life Cycle Assessment for Managing Costs and Environmental Impacts in Supply Chains. In: Seuring S, Goldbach M (Eds): Cost Management in Supply Chains. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, p 128–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.C.A.U. GmbHDreieichGermany

Personalised recommendations