Life cycle assessment study of color computer monitor

LCA Case Studies

Abstract

The environmental performance of a color computer monitor is investigated by implementing a Life Cycle Assessment. The goal of this study is to collect LCI data of foreground systems, to identify hot spots, and to introduce life cycle thinking at the product design stage. Secondary data are used in the background system, and site-specific data are collected in the foreground system.

Results show that the use phase is the most contributing phase. The operating mode and the energy saving mode during the overall use phase contribute to the total by 59% and by 9.9%, respectively. In the production phase, the cathode ray tube assembly process and the printed circuit board assembly process are the most contributing processes. The sensitivity analysis on the use pattern scenario shows that the contribution ratio of the use phase ranges from 32% to 84%. Even in the home use case, which is the best case scenario, the use phase is one of the most contributing processes to the environmental performance of the color computer monitor. There is no significant difference in the choice of the impact assessment methodologies for identifying the improvement opportunities.

For the external use of Life Cycle Assessment in a short-run product for the market, it is recommended that Life Cycle Assessment should be carried out in parallel with the product design stage. It is also necessary to have a pre-existing, in-house database for a product group in order to accelerate life cycle procedures.

Keywords

Cathode ray tube color computer monitor consumer electronic product data collection identification of hot spots LCA Life Cycle Assessment sensitivity analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Kim S, Eriksson E, Lee K (1996): Screening LCA of a microwave oven. Proceedings of SETAC Case Study Symposium, December, Brussels, Belgium, p 35Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Hwang T, Cho H, Kim S (1997): Final LCA report of monitor. Technical Document, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Suwon, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hwang T, Cho H, Kim S (1997): Final LCA report of color TV. Technical Document, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Suwon, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    BUWAL 250 (1996): Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research. EMPA, Lerchenfeldstr. 5, CH-9014, St. Gallen, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    CIT Ekologik: LCAiT database, Göteborg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1992): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Part 1. Guide. Part 2. Background. Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    IVAM Environmental Research: IVAM database 1.0, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Goedkoop M (1995): The Eco-Indicator 95. Amersfoort, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Lindfors LG, Chrisiansen K, Hoffman L, Virtanen Y, Juntilla V, Hanssen OJ, Rønning A, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (1995): Nordic Guidelines for Life Cycle Assessment. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Ryding SO, Steen B. (1992): The EPS Enviro-Accounting Method. Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL), Göteborg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    ISO/PDTR 14025 N59 (1999): Environmental Labels and Declarations-Type III Environmental Declaration-Guiding Principles and Procedure. ISOGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Korea

Personalised recommendations