ISO 14042 restricts use and development of impact assessment

Letters to the editor


  1. [1]
    Hertwich, E.G.;W.S. Pease;C.P. Koshland (1997): Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Products and Production Processes: A Comparison of Six Methods. The Science of the Total Environment 196:13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Hertwich, E.G.;W.S. Pease;T.E. McKone (1998): TE. Evaluating toxic impact assessment methods: What works best? Environmental Science & Technology 32:A138-A144Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Kleindorfer, P.R.;H.C. Kunreuther;P.G.H. Schoemaker (1993): Decision Sciences: An Integrative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Owens, J.W.;E. Amey;L. Barnthouse;F. Consoli;R. Coulon;J. Fava;K. Humphreys;B. Haaf;B. Hunt;L. Laibson;E. Mones;S. Noesen;G.Norris G;J.A. Todd;B. Vigon;J. Young (1997): Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: The State-of-the Art. Pensacola, Fl: Society of Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hertwich, E.G. (1997): Reframing LCA. Journal of Industrial Ecology, submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Energy and Resources GroupUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Defense FundOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations