Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of equilibrium electrocardiography-gated SPECT radionuclide angiography versus planar radionuclide angiography for the quantification of global left ventricular function
- 57 Downloads
Electrocardiography-gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) radionuclide angiography (RNA) provides accurate measurement of both left ventric-ular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. In this study we studied the interstudy precision and reliability of SPECT RNA as compared with planar RNA for the measurement of global systolic LV function.
Methods and Results
The population included 10 patients with chronic coronary artery disease having 2 sets of acquisitions, each consisting of planar and SPECT RNA. SPECT RNA was processed with SPECT-QBS and SPECT-35%. (For SPECT-35%, a manual segmentation method based on the 35% threshold of the maximum LV cavity activity is used to provide estimates of the number of voxels and the activity included in the LV cavity. The calculated LV number of voxels is then used to calculate LV volume measurement. The LV EF is calculated as the ratio of LV end-diastolic and end-systolic activity.) For LV EF, end-diastolic volume, and end-systolic volume, the interstudy precision, as reflected by the correlation coefficient, coefficient of variability, coefficient of repeatability, and within-subject coefficient of variation, and the interstudy reliability, as reflected by the intraclass correlation coefficient, were best with SPECT-35%, followed by planar RNA and then SPECT-QBS, respectively. The sample size needed to objectify a change in a parameter of LV function is lowest with SPECT-35%, followed by planar RNA and then SPECT-QBS, respectively.
The SPECT-35% processing method provides excellent interstudy precision and reliability for LV function measurement. In this aspect it seems to be better than planar RNA and SPECT-QBS. These results need to be confirmed in a larger patient population.
Key WordsLeft ventricle electrocardiography-gated blood pool single photon emission computed tomography ejection fraction volume radionuclide angiography
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 11.Zar J. Measures of dispersion and variability. In: Zar J, editor. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1984. p. 27–39.Google Scholar
- 17.Bland M. Determination of sample size. In: An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p.335–47.Google Scholar
- 24.Zaret BL, Wackers FJT, Terrin ML, Forman SA, Williams DO, Knatterud GL, et al. Value of radionuclide rest and exercise left ventricular ejection fraction in assessing survival of patients after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) phase II study. The TIMI Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:73–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Volpi A, De Vita C, Franzosi MG, Geraci E, Maggioni AP, Mauri F, Negri E, et al. Determinants of 6-month mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction after thrombolysis: results of the GISSI-2 Data Base. The Ad hoc Working Group of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravivienza nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI)-2 Data Base. Circulation 1993;88:416–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Mariano-Goulart D, Piot C, Boudousq V, Raczka F, Comte F, Eberle MC, et al. Routine measurements of left and right ventricular output by gated blood pool emission tomography in comparison with thermodilution measurements: a preliminary study. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:506–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Vanhove C, Franken PR, Defrise M, Momen A, Everaert H, Bossuyt A. Automatic determination of left ventricular ejection fraction from gated blood pool tomography. J Nucl Med 2001;42:307–100.Google Scholar
- 30.Streiner DL, Norman GR. Reliability. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR, editors. Health and measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 104–27.Google Scholar
- 31.Fleiss JL, editor. Sample size determination. In: The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley; 1985. p.:699–704.Google Scholar
- 32.Bland M. Comparing within-subject variances in a study to compare two methods of measurement. Available from: URL: http://www.sgul.ac.uk/depts/phs/staff/jmb/compsd.htm. Accessed Sept 1, 2005.Google Scholar