Breast Cancer

, 10:204 | Cite as

Measuring quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review of reliable and valid instruments available in japan

  • Takahiro Okamoto
  • Kojiro Shimozuma
  • Noriyuki Katsumata
  • Michiko Koike
  • Akinori Hisashige
  • Katsuhiro Tanaka
  • Shozo Ohsumi
  • Mitsue Saito
  • Naoto Shikama
  • Michihide Mitsumori
  • Chikako Yamauchi
  • Takanori Watanabe
Original Article



Little is known about the availability and psychometric properties of instruments to measure quality of life (QOL) in clinical research on Japanese patients with breast cancer. The purpose of this systematic review is to find reliable and valid instruments available in Japan, and to summarize their characteristics.


Instruments available in Japan were found through a systematic search of the literature. Each instrument identified was evaluated for item development, reliability, validity, interpretability and utility.


Six questionnaires to measure health-related QOL (the QOL-ACD, the EORTC QLQ-C30, the EORTC QLQ-BR23, the FACT-B, the SF-36, the WHO/QOL-26) and five scales to quantify the psychological burden (the STAI, the POMS, the SDS, the HADS, the GHQ), for which reliability and validity have been documented, are available in Japanese. All instruments were developed in foreign countries except for the QOL-ACD. Two of the QOL questionnaires were specific to breast cancer (the EORTC QLQ-BR23, the FACT-B). Though the measurements can be interpreted in some manner, the meaning of change scores over time has been documented for only three instruments (the EORTC QLQ-C30, the FACT-B, and the GHQ).


The review provides grounds for designing and implementing quantitative research on QOL of breast cancer patients in Japan. Methodological challenges, however, continue, particularly for validating instruments with regard to various study populations of Japanese people and demonstrating the clinical importance of change scores.

Key words

Breast cancer Quality of life (QOL) Instruments Reliability Validity 



Quality of life


the QOL Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs


the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30


the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast 23


the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Breast


the 36-item short form of the Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire


the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment questionnaire


the State Trait Anxiety Inventory


the Profile of Mood States


the Self-rating Depression Scale


the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale


the General Health Questionnaire

JBCS 1999

the QOL questionnaire for breast conserving therapy proposed by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society in 1999


the Functional Living Index-Cancer


the Quality of Life Index cancer version


  1. 1).
    Weston WW, Brown JB: Overview of the patient-centered clinical method. In: Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW eds, Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 21–30, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    Wright JG: Evaluating the outcome of treatment: Shouldn’t we be asking patients if they are better?J Clin Epidemiol 53: 549–553, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3).
    Feinstein AR: Clinimetric perspectives.J Chron Dis 40: 635–640, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4).
    Ganz PA, Coscarelli A, Fred C, Kahn B, Polinsky ML, Petersen L: Breast cancer survivors: Psychological concerns and quality of life.Breast Cancer Res Treat 38: 183–199, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5).
    Slevin ML: Quality of life: philosophical question or clinical reality?BMJ 305: 466–469, 1992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6).
    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL: Measuring healthrelated quality of life.Ann Int Med 118: 622–629, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7).
    Wood-Dauphinee S, Wood-Dauphinee S: Assessing quality of life in clinical research: From where have we come and where are we going?J Clin Epidemiol 52: 355–363, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    Gill TM, Feinstein AR: A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements.JAMA 272: 619–626, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    Leplege A, Hunt S: The problem of quality of life in medicine.JAMA 278: 47–50, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10).
    Ganz PA: Quality of life and the patient with cancer.Cancer 74: 1445–1452, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11).
    Rothman KJ, Greenland S: Causation and causal inference. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S eds, Modern Epidemiology, 2nd ed, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 7–28, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12).
    Feinstein AR: Clinical Epidemiology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. 13).
    Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P: Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine, 2nd ed, Little, Brown and Co., Boston, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    Guyatt GH, Naylor CD, Juniper E, Heyland DK, Jaeschke R, Cook DJ: Users’ guides to the medical literature: XII. How to use articles about health-related quality of life.JAMA 277: 1232–1237, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15).
    Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 2nd ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. 16).
    van Knippenberg FCE, de Haes JCJM: Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: Psychometric properties of instruments.J Clin Epidemiol 41: 1043–1053, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. 17).
    World Health Organization Working Group: The WHO quality of life assessment instrument. In: Orley J, Kuyken W eds, Quality of Life Assessment in Health Care Settings, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1994.Google Scholar
  18. 18).
    Shimozuma K, Okamoto T, Katsumata N, Koike M, Tanaka K, Osumi S, Saito M, Shikama N, Watanabe T, Mitsumori N, Yamauchi C, Hisashige A: Systematic overview of quality of life studies for breast cancer.Breast Cancer 9: 196–202, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19).
    Streiner DL: A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales.Can J Psychiatry 38: 140–148, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20).
    Shimozuma K, Tominaga T, Hayashi K, Kosaki G: Evaluation of quality of life in breast cancer patients.J Jpn Soc Cancer Ther 26: 1504–1510, 1991 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  21. 21).
    Shimozuma K, Sonoo H, Ichihara K: Medical economics and quality of life: Analysis of factors that influence the perception of medical cost by post-surgical breast cancer patients.Breast Cancer 2: 143–153, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22).
    Shimozuma K, Sonoo H, Ichihara K: Analysis of factors that improve quality of life of patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.Jpn J Cancer Chemother 22: 1095–1102, 1995 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  23. 23).
    Shimozuma K, Sonoo H, Aoyama T, Ichihara K: A comparison study of the two questionnaire measures in the assessment of quality-of-life of patients with breast cancer.Proceeding of The Society For Survival Time Studies on Cancer Patients 16: 20–26, 1996 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  24. 24).
    Shimozuma K, Sonoo H, Tanaka K, Yoshikawa K: Prognostic value of quality-of-life scores for breast cancer.Proceeding of The Society For Survival Time Studies on Cancer Patients 17: 22–28, 1997 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  25. 25).
    Shimozuma K, Sonoo H, Tanaka K, Ichihara K: Analysis of factors that improve quality of life of patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.Jpn J Breast Cancer 12: 58–67, 1997 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  26. 26).
    Shimozuma K, Katsumata N, Ohashi Y, Makino H, Takashima S, Sonoo H, Watanabe T: Psychometric properties of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QOL-ACD in NSAS-BC trial.Jpn J Breast Cancer 14: 548–549, 1999 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  27. 27).
    Shimozuma K, Sonoo H, Ichihara K, Tanaka K: The prognostic value of quality-of-life scores: Preliminary results of an analysis of patients with breast cancer.Surg Today 30: 255–261, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28).
    Amano S, Hata S, Mori K, Saito Y, Shibata M, Takizawa H, Miyake H, Kurosu Y, Yokoyma H: Evaluation of quality of life during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.Jpn J Breast Cancer 12: 43–49, 1997 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  29. 29).
    Higaki K, Okamura S, Toyota M, Tanaka K: A study of comparison of the quality of life of modified radical mastectomy with breast conserving surgery.The Journal of the Hiroshima Medical Association 50: 679–685, 1997 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  30. 30).
    Umegaki H, Minami C, Katou H, Kawasaki T, Fukunaga T, Shimizu A: Perioperative psychological status of patients undergoing radical mastectomy and total hysterectomy.Masui 42: 523–528, 1993 (in Japanese with English abstract).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31).
    Koshimura R, Matsuki M, Otani E: The relationship between ego status and anxiety level, social support for mastectomy patients.Nursing Journal of Okasa Univ 1: 25–30, 1995 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  32. 32).
    Nukariya K: A longitudinal prospective study of psychology in breast cancer.Tokyo Jikeikai Medical Journal 111: 165–182, 1996 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  33. 33).
    Iida Y, Kakinuma K, Ide S: Chronological changes in intensity and contents of anxiety in patients with breast cancer.The Collection of Papers 29th The Japan Society of Nursing — Adult Nursing II, pp 58–60, 1998 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  34. 34).
    Futawatari T: Quality of life after breast cancer surgery.Bull Inst Public Health 43: 333–335, 1994 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  35. 35).
    Yokoe T, Lino Y, Takei H, Horiguchi A, Maemura M, Futawatari T, Morishita Y: Quality of life of patients with breast cancer detected by mass screening.J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen 5: 249–254, 1996 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  36. 36).
    Saeki H, Osumi S, Saeki T, Takashima S, Eguchi K: Chronological changes of the quality of life of breast cancer patients with breast conservation and / or adjuvant chemotherapy.Proceeding of The Society For Survival Time Studies on Cancer Patients 18: 28–34, 1998 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  37. 37).
    Higaki K, Okamura S, Morita K, Yoshitaka T, Ohsaki S, Matsuura K, Taki M, Tokunaga N, Hamai Y, Tateishi A, Tagashira H, Onoda T, Shiozaki S, Ohno S, Ninomiya M, Ikeda T, Kobayashi N, Asakura H, Kagemoto M: Evaluation of informed consent based on QOL questionnaire survey when patients decided between mastectomy and breast-conservation.The Journal of the Hiroshima Medical Association 52: 908–915, 1999 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  38. 38).
    Koyama H, Inaji H: Clinical evaluation of Azasetron hydrochloride (single-injection) in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in outpatient chemotherapy.Jpn Pharmacol Ther 23: 729–733, 1995 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  39. 39).
    Kato C, Ito Y, Takahashi S, Nakano Y, Ohsawa H, Ishizuka H, Uno S, Irie T, Mihara H, Aiba K, Horikoshi N: Assessment of quality of life for breast cancer patients receiving CAF in outpatient setting: Patients self-estimation of satisfaction and analysis of their factors.Jpn J Breast Cancer 12: 50–57, 1997 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  40. 40).
    Iha S, Sonoo H, Shimozuma K, Miyauchi A, Konishi Y, Kohno N, Arita S, Senoo T: BCT and mastectomy: A comparison of their effects on the quality of life of breast cancer patients.Jpn J Breast Cancer 12: 13–22, 1997 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  41. 41).
    Sprangers MAG, Groenvold M, Arraras JI, Franklin J, de Velde A, Muller M, Franzini L, Williams A, de Haes HC, Hopwood P, Cull A, Aaronson NK: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer — Specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: First results from a three-country field study.J Clin Oncol 14: 2756–2768, 1996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42).
    Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G: Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument.J Clin Oncol 15: 974–986, 1997.Google Scholar
  43. 43).
    Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K: Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 health survey for use in Japan.J Clin Epidemiol 51: 1037–1044, 1998.Google Scholar
  44. 44).
    Fukuhara S, Ware JE, Koshinski M, Wada S, Gandek B: Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 health survey.J Clin Epidemiol 51: 1045–1053, 1998.Google Scholar
  45. 45).
    World Health Organization. WHO/QOL-26 Manual. Tazaki M, Nakane A, eds. Kaneko Shobo, Tokyo, 1997 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  46. 46).
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP, Kitamura T: Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD Scale).Seishinka Shindangaku 4: 371–372, 1993 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  47. 47).
    Nakagawa Y, Daibo I: The Japanese Version of the General Health Questionnaire: User’s Manual. Nihon Bunka Kagakusha, Tokyo, 1985 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  48. 48).
    Kurihara M, Shimizu H, Tsuboi K, Kobayashi K, Murakami M, Eguchi K, Shimozuma K: Development of quality of life questionnaire in Japan: Quality of life assessment of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Psycho-Oncology 8: 355–363, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49).
    Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, Eckberg K, Lloyd S, Purl S, Blendowski C, Goodman M, Barnicle M, Stewart I, McHale M, Bonomi P, Kaplan E, Taylor IV S, Thomas CR Jr, Harris J: The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure.J Clin Oncol 11: 570–579, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50).
    Ware JE, Jr: SF-36 Health Survey: Manual & Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, Boston, 1993.Google Scholar
  51. 51).
    Zung WWK: A self-rating depression scale.Arch Gen Psychiatry 12: 63–70, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52).
    Goldberg DP: The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire: A Technique for the Identification and Assessment of Non-psychotic Psychiatric Illness. Maudsley Monograph No. 21, Oxford University Press, London, 1972.Google Scholar
  53. 53).
    Goldberg DP, Williams P: A User’s Guide to the General Health Questionnaire: GHQ, National Foundation for Education Research — Nelson Publishing, Berkshore, 1988.Google Scholar
  54. 54).
    User’s Manual for Self-rating Depression Scale. Sankyobo, 1983 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  55. 55).
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberi A, Fletcher H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JCJM, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osoba D, Razavi D, Rofe PB, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of -life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–376, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56).
    Kobayashi K, Takeda F, Teramukai S, Gotoh I, Sakai H, Yoneda S, Noguchi Y, Ogasawara H, Yoshida K: A cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancer.Eur J Cancer 34: 810–815, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57).
    Yokoyama K, Araki S: User’s Manual for Japanese Version of Profile of Mood States, Kaneko Shobo, 1994 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  58. 58).
    Hidano N, Fukuhara M, Iwawaki M, Soga S, Spielberger C: User’s Manual for Revised Version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Jitsumu Kyoiku Shuppan, 1994 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  59. 59).
    Higashi A, Yashiro H, Keisuke K, Kiyota K, Inokuchi H, Hatta H, Fujita K, Watanabe Y, Kawai K: Validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in a gastro-intestinal clinic.Jpn J Gastroenterology 93: 884–892, 1996 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  60. 60).
    Hatta H, Higashi A, Yashiro H, Ozasa K, Hayashi K, Kiyota K, Inokuchi H, Ikeda J, Fujita K, Watanabe Y, Kawai K: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: Reliability and validity study on the Japanese version with a study population of female subjects.Jpn J Psychosomatic Medicine (Tokyo) 38: 309–315, 1998 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  61. 61).
    Tazaki M, Nakane Y: QOL of cancer patients.Shinshin Iryo 7: 1166–1171, 1995 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  62. 62).
    Yokoyama K, Araki S, Kawakami N: Production of the Japanese edition of Profile of Mood States (POMS): Assessment of reliability and validity.Jpn J Public Health 37: 913–918, 1990.Google Scholar
  63. 63).
    Takeuchi M, Kitamura T: The factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire in a Japanese high school and university student sample.The International J Social Psychiatry 37: 99–106, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64).
    Ormel J, Koeter MWJ, van den Brink W: Measuring change with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). The problem of retest effects.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatrr Epidemiol 24: 227–232, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65).
    McDowell I, Newell C: General Health Status and Quality of Life. In McDowell I, Newell C eds, Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires, 2nd ed, New York, Oxford University Press, pp 380–383, 1996.Google Scholar
  66. 66).
    Lara-Muñoz C, Feinstein AR: How should quality of life be measured?J Investig Med 47: 17–24, 1999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67).
    Feinstein AR: Clinical judgment revisited: The distraction of quantitative models.Ann Int Med 120: 799–805, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Breast Cancer Society 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takahiro Okamoto
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kojiro Shimozuma
    • 3
    • 4
  • Noriyuki Katsumata
    • 5
  • Michiko Koike
    • 6
  • Akinori Hisashige
    • 7
  • Katsuhiro Tanaka
    • 8
  • Shozo Ohsumi
    • 9
  • Mitsue Saito
    • 10
  • Naoto Shikama
    • 11
  • Michihide Mitsumori
    • 12
  • Chikako Yamauchi
    • 12
  • Takanori Watanabe
    • 13
  1. 1.Departments of Endocrine SurgeryJapan
  2. 2.Hygiene and Public Health IITokyo Women’s Medical UniversityJapan
  3. 3.Lnstitute for Scientific Research of StressPublic Health Research FoundationJapan
  4. 4.School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of TokyoJapan
  5. 5.Department of Medical OncologyNational Cancer Center HospitalJapan
  6. 6.Cinza Prima ClinicJapan
  7. 7.Department of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Tokushima Graduate School of MedicineJapan
  8. 8.Department of Surgery, Breast and Thyroid DivisionKawasaki Medical SchoolJapan
  9. 9.Department of SurgeryNational Shikoku Cancer CenterJapan
  10. 10.Department of Breast SurgeryNational Cancer Center Research InstituteJapan
  11. 11.Department of RadiologyShinshu University School of MedicineJapan
  12. 12.Department of Therapeutic Radiology and OncologyKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineJapan
  13. 13.Department of Surgery IIFukushima Medical University School of MedicineJapan

Personalised recommendations