Breast Cancer

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 235–241 | Cite as

Survey on pamphlet use explaining breast cancer operations in Japan

  • Nobuyuki Hamajima
  • Tooru Takeuchi
  • Takuji Iwase
  • Hiroshi Murai
  • Shigeto Miura
Original Article
Received:
Accepted:
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The burden on hospitals to provide information has been increasing. This study examined the demands of surgeons and patients using a pamphlet explaining breast cancer operation procedures.

Methods

A questionnaire with an eight-page pamphlet was sent to 367 hospitals with surgery departments in Aichi and Gifu prefectures in Japan. The same pamphlet and a self-administered anonymous questionnaire were also sent to 173 members of a breast cancer patient association, who had undergone breast cancer operations and lived in the same prefectures.

Results

Responses to the questionnaire from 196 hospitals (53%) and 122 patients (71%) were analyzed. Breast cancer operations were conducted at 8 departments of 5 university hospitals, 37 governmental hospitals, 25 non-profit hospitals, and 66 private hospitals, a total of 1 36 hospitals. Among them, 34 hospitals participated in clinical trials. Fourteen hospitals had already used pamphlets as a tool for the explanation of breast cancer operation procedures. Hospitals having experienced special discussion with patients regarding the operation procedure were few, and only two hospitals reported claims or lawsuits concerning the operation procedure. About 60% of the hospitals wished to use the pamphlet, while 86% of the patients answered that it would have been useful if handed out before the operation. These patients stated that hospitals should provide this kind of pamphlet to breast cancer patients before operations.

Conclusions

It was clearly demonstrated that the great majority of hospitals in Japan lacked the basic tools for information provision on breast cancer operation procedures, while patients want enough information for self-determination.

Key words

Pamphlet use Informed consent Lawsuits Clinical trial Disclosure of diagnosis 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. l).
    Hirokawa W: Clinical pharmacologists and drug regulation; Future perspective in Japan.Br J Clin Pharmacol 42:63–71, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2).
    Bioethics Committee of Japan Medical Association: Report on “Informed Consent.”J Jpn Med Assoc 103: 515–535, 1990 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    “Committee Concerning How Informed Consent Should Be” of Ministry of Health and Welfare (Chairperson, Kunio Yanagida): Report concerning how informed consent should be.Health and Welfare (Tokyo) 4374:10–15, 1995 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    Hamajima N, Chubu Prostate Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy Group: First use of video in informed consent process of randomized controlled trial in Japan.Int J Clin Oncol 2:156–160, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5).
    Oizumi T, Ohira T, Kawase T: Information disclosure to community and patients; Multimedia aided informed consent and information provision on internet.Hospitals (Tokyo) 56:232–234, 1997 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    Barbour GL, Blumenkrentz JM: Video aides informed consent decision.JAMA 240:2741–2742, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7).
    Rice B: Educate your patients without taking more time.Med Econ 69:92–105, 1992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    Randall T: Producers of videodisc programs strive to expand patient’s role in medical decision-making process.JAMA 270:160–162, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    Hopper KD, Zajdel M, Hulse SF,et at Interactive method of informing patients of the risks of intravenous contrast media.Radiology 192:67–71, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10).
    Koyama H, Inaji H, Noguchi S,et at Recent progress in breast conserving therapy; From experiences in Japan.Breast Cancer 3:151–160, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11).
    Nagata Y, Shibuya K, Mitsumori M,et at Informed consent and radiotherapy.J Jpn Soc Cancer Ther 32: 160–168, 1997 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. 12).
    Kanagawa T: Modern Textbook of Medical Law, 2nd ed, Kanehara Printing Co, Tokyo, 1995 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  13. 13).
    United States General Accounting Office: Health Care; Initiatives in Hospital Risk Management, Washington DC, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    Nayfield SG, Bongiovanni GC, Alciati MH,et al Statutory requirements for disclosure of breast cancer treatment alternatives.JNCI 86:1202–1208, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15).
    Harris J, Turnbull A: You can’t ask if you don’t know what to ask; A survey of the information needs and resources of hospital outpatients.NZ Med J 105:199–202, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16).
    Hamajima N, Tajima K, Morishita M,et al Patients’ expectation of information provided at cancer hospitals in Japan.Jpn J Clin Oncol 26:362–367, 1996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17).
    Hamajima N, Kato H, Miura S,et at Medical information requested by breast clinic outpatient.Jpn J Breast Cancer 12:583–592, 1997 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  18. 18).
    Long SO, Ling BD: Curable cancers and fatal ulcers; Attitudes toward cancer in Japan.Soc Sci Med 16: 2101–2108, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19).
    Teshima H, Kihara H, Ago Y,et at Terminal care for patients with lung cancer.Jpn J Thorac Dis 25:305–311, 1987 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  20. 20).
    Tanida N: Japanese attitudes towards truth disclosure in cancer.Scan J Soc Med 22:50–57, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21).
    Matsuei T, Shimizu M, Yoshida H,et at Summary of Vital Statistics Socioecomomic Survey (Malignant Neoplasm) 1992.J Health Welfare Stat (Tokyo) 40(7): 19–27, 1993 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  22. 22).
    Nakagawa S, Kimura M, Itokawa Y,et at Development of the internet-based total health care management system using electronic mail.J Epidemiol 5: 131–140, 1995Google Scholar
  23. 23).
    Kikuchi Y: Hospital library for patients.Hospitals (Tokyo) 56:366–367, 1997 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  24. 24).
    Robinson G, Merav A: Informed consent; Recall by patients tested postoperatively.Ann Thorac Surg 22: 209–212, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25).
    Muss HB, White DR, Michielutte R,et at Written informed consent in patients with breast cancer.Cancer 43:1549–1556, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26).
    Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K,et at Informed consent; Why are its goals imperfectly realized?N Engl J Med 302:896–900, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Breast Cancer Society 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nobuyuki Hamajima
    • 1
  • Tooru Takeuchi
    • 2
  • Takuji Iwase
    • 2
  • Hiroshi Murai
    • 2
  • Shigeto Miura
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of EpidemiologyAichi Cancer Center Research InstituteChikusa-ku,NagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Breast SurgeryAichi Cancer Center HospitalJapan

Personalised recommendations