Contemporary Jewry

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 3–22 | Cite as

The utility of long interviews in the study of American Jews

  • Steven M. Cohen
Article

Abstract

In the study of contemporary Jewish identity, long interviews offer several advantages over sample surveys that focus heavily on behavior, and that have played a valuable role in helping us understand American Jewry over the last half century. Especially when used judiciously, in conjunction with surveys that plumb behaviors and attitudes alike, long interviews:
  1. 1.

    Add depth and richness to our observations, even those that are well-established.

     
  2. 2.

    Provide indispensable material for conveying the import of our research.

     
  3. 3.

    Provide a counter-balance to survey evidence, accessing respondents’ inner voices, or socially undesirable views, or ideas that have not yet emerged into public rhetoric.

     
  4. 4.

    Lend insight into unexplored areas that could not be anticipated by survey researchers.

     
  5. 5.

    Allow for the emergence of “non-findings,” as well as more powerful findings, by providing for unaided recall, rather than the pre-determined prompting that is almost indigenous to survey research.

     

Recent developments in American Jews, Judaism, and Jewishness make the tum to long interviews even more necessary and useful than in the past. Of special relevance is the growth in diversity and idiosyncrasy, in the self as ultimately authoritative, and in the search for personal meaning as the driving force behind Jewish engagement. These are conditions and themes that clearly lend themselves more readily to investigation by tools of observation that are more personal, immediate, and nuanced. The long interview is clearly one such tool.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen, Eric H. (1994).The Participants of the Israel Experience Short-Term Programs Summer/1993-Winter/1994: Toward a Strategy of Excellence, Jerusalem: The Youth and Hechalutz Department & the Joint Authority for Jewish Zionist Education.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, Steven M. 1974. “The Impact of Jewish Education on Religious Identification and Practice.”Jewish Social Studies (October): 316–326.Google Scholar
  3. — 1983.American Modernity and Jewish Identity. New York and London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  4. — 1985. “Outreach to the Marginally Affiliated: Evidence and Implications for Policy-makers in Jewish Education.”Journal of Jewish Communal Service 62 (Winter): 147–157.Google Scholar
  5. -. 1987. “Ties and Tensions: The 1986 Survey of American Jewish Attitudes toward Israel and Israelis.” American Jewish Committee.Google Scholar
  6. — 1988.American Assimilation or Jewish Revival? Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. -. 1989. “Ties and Tensions: An Update-The 1989 Survey of American Jewish Attitudes toward Israel and Israelis.” American Jewish Committee.Google Scholar
  8. -. 1991. “After the Gulf War: American Jews’ Attitudes toward Israel-The 1991 National Survey of American Jews.” American Jewish Committee.Google Scholar
  9. — 1995. “The Impact of Varieties of Jewish Education upon Jewish Identity: An Inter-generational Perspective.”Contemporary Jewry 16: 68–96.Google Scholar
  10. — 1996. “Did American Jews Really Grow More Distant from Israel? A Reconsideration.” InEnvisioning Israel, ed. Alon Gal. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, and Jerusalem: Magnus Press, Hebrew University.Google Scholar
  11. — 1998.Religious Stability and Ethnic Decline. New York: JCC Association.Google Scholar
  12. -. Cohen, Steven M. and Arnold Eisen. Forthcoming.The Jew Within. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. DellaPergola, Sergio. 1999. “World Jewish Population, 1997.”American Jewish Year Book 99: 543–580.Google Scholar
  14. Eisen, Arnold. 1998.Rethinking Modern Judaism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Feldstein, Donald. 1984.The American Jewish Community in the 21st Century: A Projection. New York: American Jewish Congress.Google Scholar
  16. Finkel, Steven. 1995.Causal Analysis With Panel Data. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein, Sidney. 1992. “Profile of American Jewry: Insights from the 1990 National Jewish Population Survey.”American Jewish Year Book 92: 77–173.Google Scholar
  18. Goldstein, Sidney and Calvin Goldscheider. 1968.Jewish Americans. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstein, Sidney and Alice Goldstein. 1996.Jews on the Move. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  20. Himmelfarb, Harold S. 1980. “The Study of American Jewish Identification: How It is Defined, Measured, Obtained, Sustained, and Lost.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 19 (March): 18–60.Google Scholar
  21. Horowitz, Bethamie. 1993.The 1991 New York Jewish Population Study. New York: UJA-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York.Google Scholar
  22. —. 2000.Connections and Journeys: Assessing Critical Opportunities for Enhancing Jewish Identity. New York: UJA/Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York.Google Scholar
  23. Israel, Sherry R. 1997.Comprehensive Report on the 1995 Demographic Study. Boston: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston.Google Scholar
  24. Kosmin, Barry; Sidney Goldstein; Joseph Waksberg; Jeffrey Scheckner; and Ariella Keysar. 1991.Highlights of the CJF 1990 National Jewish Population Study. New York: Council of Jewish Federations.Google Scholar
  25. Liebman, Charles and Steven M. Cohen. 1990.Two Worlds of Judaism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Josselson, Ruthellen and Amia Lieblich (eds). 1993.The Narrative Study of Lives. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. McCracken, Grant. 1988.The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Merton, Robert, Margorie Fiske, and Patricia L. Kendall. 1956.The Focused Interview: A Manual of Problems and Procedures. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Phillips, Bruce A. 1997. “Re-examining Intermarriage: Trends, Textures, and Strategies.” Boston: Wilstein Institute, and New York: American Jewish Committee.Google Scholar
  30. Ringer, Benjamin B. 1967.The Edge of Friendliness: A Study of Jewish-Gentile Relations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. I.E. Seidman. 1991.Interviewing as Qualitative Research. N.Y.: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sklare, Marshall and Joseph Greenblum. 1967.Jewish Identity on the Suburban Frontier. N.Y.: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Wall, Susan. 1994.Parents of Pre-Schoolers. DHL dissertation, Jewish Theological Seminary of America.Google Scholar
  34. Waters, Mary C. 1990.Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wertheimer, Jack. 1997. “Current Trends in American Jewish Philanthropy.”American Jewish Yearbook 97: 3–92.Google Scholar
  36. Woocher, Jonathan S. 1986.Sacred Survival: The Civil Religion of American Jews. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wuthnow, Robert. 1999.Growing Up Religious. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven M. Cohen
    • 1
  1. 1.Melton Centre for Jewish EducationThe Hebrew UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations