Advertisement

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1926-1967)

, Volume 36, Issue 9, pp 409–415 | Cite as

Cork-kerry Irish compared anthropometrically with 139 modern and ancient peoples

  • Albert E. Casey
  • Roberta B. Franklin
Article

Summary

Living Cork-Kerry Irish were compared with 139 modern and ancient peoples using 36 factors, 14 blood groups, 3 skin, hair and eye pigmentations and 22 physical measurements. The method was a form of multiple correlation in which the class interval for each factor was one-half the standard deviation, and numerical values allocated to each half-standard deviation. The Irish, Northern Scots, Icelanders, S.W. Norse, N. Dutch and Frisians form a racial entity with 97 per cent. inter-correlation and very little change during the past 1,000–4,000 years. There is a high correlation with the ancient Scythians substantiating the Irish legends of descent from the kings of Scythia. There is a substantial mixture of upper palaeolithic and Neanderthal man in the north-western perimeter of Europe, exemplified by the people of Cork and Kerry, a mixture not shared by the American Indians, the Australian Aborigines, and by the Bushmen and Pygmies of Africa. There is a good possibility that the large frame, red hair, blue eyes and white skin of West Europe was contributed by upper palaeolithic and Neanderthal men.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    A. E. Casey,O’ Kief, Coshe Mang, Slieve Lougher and Upper Blackwater in Ireland, Vol. IV, Knocknagree Historical Fund, Birmingham, Ala. (Early 1961).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. A. Hooten and C. W. Dupertuis,The Physical Anthropology of Ireland, Peabody Mus. Papers, 30, #1 and 2, Cambridge, Mass. (1955).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. E. R. Hackett and G. W. Dawson,Irish J. of Med. Sci., 6th Ser. 387, 99–109 (1958).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. E. Mourant,The Distribution of the Human Blood Groups, Chas. C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill. (1954).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Lahovary,Bull. de la Soc. suisse d’ Anthropologie et d’ Ethnologie, 53: 55 (1952).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. S. Wiener,Blood Groups and Transfusion, 3rd Ed., Chas. C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill. (1945).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. S. Coon,The Races of Europe, Macmillan Co., N.Y. (1939).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Field,Peabody Museum Papers, Boston, Mass., Vols. 46, 48, 52 (1951, 1953, 1959).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Field,Anthropological Series, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Vols. 29, 30 (1939, 1949).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. A. Barnicot and D. R. Brothwell,The Evaluation of Metrical Data in the Comparison of Ancient and Modern Bones, p. 131–161,Medical Biology and Etruscan Origins, Ciba Foundation, Little Brown & Co., Boston (1959).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. W. Howells,The Early Christian Irish, V. 46, Sect. C #3, The Skeletons at Gallen Priory (Co. Offaly),Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., Hodges Figgis & Co., Ltd., Dublin (1941).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. D. Hambly,Source Book for African Anthropology, V. 26, Pt. I, Field Museum, Chicago (1937).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. C. Briggs,The Living Races of the Sahara Desert, Peabody Museum Papers, V. 28, #2 (1958).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. N. Vyas,Annals of Human Genetics, 22: 185 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Manuila,Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 14: 577 (1956).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. T. Newman and C. E. Snow, Preliminary Report on the Skeletal Material from Pickwick Basin, Ala.Bull. Bur. of Amer. Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, 129: 393 (1942).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. H. Schultz,Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 9: 65–80 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert E. Casey
  • Roberta B. Franklin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations