Sugar Tech

, 6:169 | Cite as

Enhancing efficiency of fertilizer n use in sugarcane by ring-pit method of planting

Short communication


Nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane variety CoS767 was measured in terms of partial factor productivity (PFP) and agronomic efficiency (AE) of applied N through a field experiment conducted during spring season in a sandy loan alluvial entisol soil at the Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow (26.50 N, 80.50 E and 120 m amsl). For this purpose, ten treatment combinations (2 methods of planting i.e. conventional flat and ring-pit method x 5 levels of N i.e. O, 75, 150, 225 and 300 Kg N ha-1 through urea) were tested in a randomized block design with 3 replications. In general, cane yield, PFP and AE were significantly greater in ring-pit method than that in conventional flat method. The optimum doses of N were 441 Kg N ha-1 in conventional flat method and 356 Kg N ha-1 in ring-pit method. To produce one tonne of cane yield, the crop required 8.481 Kg N in conventional flat method and 2.3421 Kg N in ring pit method of planting.


N use efficiency planting methods sugarcane 


  1. Jackson, M.L. (1973).Soil Chemical Analysis, New Delhi, India Printice Hall of India Limited in Subtropics.Google Scholar
  2. Pannje, R.R. (1971). Cultural methods of Sugarcane Production in Subtropics Proceedings of XVII.Confess of Interntional Society of Sugarcane Technologists. Vol.1: 357–367.Google Scholar
  3. Singh, G.B. (2002). Management of plant population in sugarcane for higher productivity and quality.Proceedings of International Symposium on Food, nutrient and economic security through diversification in sugarcane production and processing systems: held at the Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research Lucknow from 16–18 February, 2002 pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
  4. Singh, K., Yadav, R.L., Singh, B., Hora, B.S., Singh, R.V. Singh R.A. (1984). Ring method of planting sugarcane: A new technique.Biological Memoirs,9: 161–166.Google Scholar
  5. Yadav, R.L. (1992). High population density Management in Sugarcane.Proceedings Indian National Science Academy,B57 (3&4): 175–182.Google Scholar
  6. Yadav, R.L. andSharma, R.K. (1978). Correlation and regression studies between yield and its attributes in sugarcane.Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology,1: 17–22.Google Scholar
  7. Yadav, R.L. andSingh, K. (1986). Effect of pit dimensions and seed rate on rooting pattern and yield of sugarcane in ring planting system.Biological Memoirs,12: 133–137.Google Scholar
  8. Yadav, R.L. Kumar, R. andVerma, R.S. (1990). Effect of planting technique and planting desnsity on yield of late planted sugarcane in North Central India.Experimental Agriculture,27: 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Sugarcane ResearchIndia

Personalised recommendations