Sugar Tech

, Volume 7, Issue 2–3, pp 93–95 | Cite as

Comparative Performance of Micropropagated and Conventionally Raised Crops of Sugarcane

  • Ramanand, M. Lal
  • S. B. Singh
Short Communication

Abstract

A comparative study on the performance of tissue culture raised and conventional crops of sugarcane was made at eight locations in sugar mill area of Nahar Sugar and Allied Industries Ltd., Amloh (Punjab). In vitro raised plantlets of sugarcane varieties viz. CoJ 64 and CoJ 83 were hardened, acclimatized and transplanted to the fields for cane formation. After maturity, the seed material was again sown in the field by sett cutting method along with appropriate control for field evaluation of the crops. On the basis of data, it was observed that the tissue culture raised crop was superior in both agro-morphological and quality traits over the crop raised by conventional method.

Key words

Tissue culture sugarcane field evaluation micropropagation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous (2000). Survey of Indian Agriculture,The Hindu. Google Scholar
  2. Flynn, J.L. and Anderlini T.A. (1989). Disease incidence and yield performance of tissue culture generated seed cane over crop cycle in Louisiana.Sugar Journal 53 (3): 15.Google Scholar
  3. Kilaru, A. (1998). Micropropagation of sugarcane: A commercial approach.Proc. 60thAnn. Conv. Sugarcane Technologists Association of India, p. 81–86.Google Scholar
  4. Krishnamurthy, M. (1994). Alteration of conventional and unconventional means of breeding in sugarcane. Proc. SABRAO, XVIIth Int. Congr. And WSAA Symp. Held at academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan, Nov. 16-19, 1 (35): 285–289.Google Scholar
  5. Lal, J. and Pande, H.P. (2003).In vitro rejuvenation and micropropagation of deteriorated sugarcane cultivars.Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology,18 (1&2): 85–87.Google Scholar
  6. Lal, N. (1997). Performance of sugarcane mericlone transplants under different inter and intra-row spacing combinations.Sugarcane 6: 12–14.Google Scholar
  7. Lal, N. and Krishna, R. (1997). Yield comparison in sugarcane crop raised from conventional and mericlone derived seed cane.Indian Sugar XLVIl (8): 617–621.Google Scholar
  8. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture.Physiol. Plant.,15: 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Savangikar, V.A. (1995). Sugarcane tissue culture technology development and commercial side. Seminar on application of Biotechnology for sustainable sugarcane production. 44th Annual Conv. DSTA, Pune, pp. 48–51.Google Scholar
  10. Savangikar, V.A. (1996). Observation on the performance of commercial tissue cultured plantation at low planting density. 44th Annual Conv. DSTA, Pune, pp. 144–148.Google Scholar
  11. Sood, N., Srivastava, R. and Gosal, S.S. (1999).In vitro multiplication and field evaluation of sugarcane. Proc. S.T.A.I.61: 3–9.Google Scholar
  12. Sreenivasan, T.V. and Sreenivasan, J. (1992). Micropropagation of sugarcane varieties for increasing cane yield.SISSTA, Sugar J.,14 (4): 61–64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramanand, M. Lal
    • 1
  • S. B. Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.Research NaharAllied Industries LtdSugar Amloh (Punjab)India
  2. 2.Development CentreAllied Industries Ltd.Amloh (Punjab)India
  3. 3.Sugarcane Research InstituteUPCSRShahjahanpur (U.P.)India

Personalised recommendations