Advertisement

Sugar Tech

, Volume 7, Issue 2–3, pp 15–19 | Cite as

Assessment of genetic purity of micropropagated plants of sugarcane by isozyme and RAPD analysis

  • Radha JainEmail author
  • Sangeeta Srivastava
  • Jyotsna Singh
  • Prashant S. Gupta
Article

Abstract

Shoot tip expiants of nine sugarcane varieties(Saccharum species hybrid.), CoLk 8102, CoLk 8001, CoS 767, CoLk 9606, CoLk 9617, CoS 95255, BO 91, CoJ 64 and Co 1148, were established on a solid MS medium containing 0.8% agar, 3% sucrose and 0.05mg/l of IAA, BAP and kinetin. Shoot regeneration has been achieved in liquid MS medium containing 0.5mg/l each of IAA, BAP and kinetin. Multiple shoots were obtained on liquid MS medium containing 0.01mg/l IAA, 0.5mg/l each of 6- benzyl aminopurine (BAP), kinetin and rooting occurred in 1/2 strength liquid MS medium with 5.0 mg/l NAA and 0.01 mg/l each of BAP and kinetin. To detect the genetic purity of in vitro raised plantlets, expression of iso-peroxidases in donor plants andin vitro raised plantlets was compared through native PAGE. Different genotypes showed marked variation regarding number, position and intensity of bands. Micropropagated plantlets showed identical pattern of peroxidases to their parental clones. The genetic stability of micro propagated plantlets was also tested by RAPD analysis. The banding pattern of PCR amplified products from micro propagated plantlets was monomorphic based on RAPD profile in all the varieties. RAPD analysis and peroxidase isozyme pattern confirmed the genetic purity of sugarcane plantlets derivedin vitro.

Key words

Isozyme pattern RAPD micropropagation sugarcane 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anita, P., Jain, R.K., Sehrawat, A.R. and Punia, A. (2000). Efficient and cost- effective micropropagation of two early maturing varieties of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)Indian Sugar50: 611–618.Google Scholar
  2. Cloutier, S. and Landry, B.S. (1994). Molecular markers applied to plant tissue culture.In vitro Cell. Develop. Biol.30: 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Sabir, A., Newbury, H.J., Todd, C. and Catty, J. (1992). Determination of genetic stability using isozymes and RFLPs in beet plants regeneratedin vitro.Theor. Appl. Genet.84:113–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Irvine, J. E., Benda, G.T. A., Legendre, B. L. and Machado, Jr.,G. R. (1984). The frequency of marker changes in sugarcane plants regenerated from callus culture.Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult.3: 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kazim, A. and Shahid, A. (2001). Rapid multiplication of sugarcane through micropropagation technique.Pak. Sug. J.16: 11–14.Google Scholar
  6. Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Cleavage and structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature227: 680- 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Larkin, P. and Scowcroft, W. R. (1981). Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement.Theor. Appl. Genet.60:197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee, TSG. (1987). Micropropagation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.).Pl. Cell Tiss. Org. Cult.10: 47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lowry, O. H., Rosenbrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with folin Phenol reagent.J. Bio. Chem.193: 265- 275.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, A. R., Kelley, T. J. and Mujer, C. V. (1990). Anodic peroxidase isoenzymes and polyphenol oxidase activity from cucumber fruit: Tissue and substrate specificity.Phytochemistry29: 705–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture.Physiol. Plantarum15: 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rani, V., Parida, A. and Raina, S. N. (1995). Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers for genetic analysis in micropropagated plants ofPopulus deltoides Marsh.Plant Cell Rep.14: 459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saini, N., Saini, M.L. and Jain, R.K. (2004). Large scale production, field performance and RAPD analysis of micropropagated sugarcane plants.IndianJ. Genet.64: 102–107.Google Scholar
  14. Singh, B., Yadav, G.C. and Lal, M. (2001). An efficient protocol for micropropagation of sugarcane using shoot tip expiants.Sugar Tech.3: 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhing, D.S. (1987). Comparisons of 6 isozymes in 12 accessions of Sugarcane materials.J. Fujian Agricultural College16:101–110Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radha Jain
    • 1
  • Sangeeta Srivastava
    • 1
  • Jyotsna Singh
    • 1
  • Prashant S. Gupta
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Sugarcane ResearchLucknow-226002U.P.India

Personalised recommendations